So great to see this again after many, many years.
Random thoughts:
*I had forgotten what a mansion the house was...the place was amazing...would cost in the millions today I'm sure.
*The acting wasn't as bad as I'd feared: Darby was very effective (her best role ever? I have no idea) as the scared housewife, Hutton was ok in general..a bit over the tops at times but not bad overall. William Demarest wasn't as good but that was probably due to the writing for his role.
*The production was well done for a TV Movie especially...very effective use of lighting/sound (I'm speaking as a total laymen in these areas btw) probably the biggest reason for its overall creepiness.
Spoilers:
*The creatures overall are good, especially given the year it was made, but they do seem to change sizes at times...the shower scene thy're about a foot tall in other instances barly inches tall.
*One real sort of plot hole is Demarest's character, his explanation/knowledge of the creatures is all over the place. They corner him at one point and then in a later scene doesn't reveal their existence to Hutton when he totally could have.
I've studied this movie extensively, and the creatures'sizes seem consistant, and they were indeed midgets filmed on a double-sized set, making them between eleven and 22 inches tall (one was too small to get up the double-sized stairs on the set).
The heights would've been maybe 11, 17, and about 22 inches.
Inch high creatures are not much of a threat, and I don't EVER think the were that small.
and even these creatures, which are the size of cats or rhesus monkeys might not be all that much of a threat -- but they do have hyperdimensional qualities (able to disappear into unlikely places) and are really not animals -- more like trolls, darklings, goblins. They definately had physical bodies.
Old houses have plenty of 'cool' spaces for the imagination to run wild. Not only are their ashpits in fireplaces, but also pipe chaces, odd cabinets, sealed-up spaces, pockets behind sliding doors, voids next to chimneys, crawlspaces, ductwork with fancy grilles, sometimes entire sealed-off stairways and tunnles.
If a remake is ever made of this movie, the creatures ought to be mishappen, ghoulish, goblinized frog-monkey-vampire alien things with ratlike/grey alien qualities as well. They should be hideously ugly like run over prunes and feces. With dead little ratlike monkey hands -- but never really seen, always retreating to the dark, always hard to see even when there is a little light, and never able to take more than the light of a candle at 4-5 feet away.
And 'cause' never was the reason for the evening, --Or the Tropic of Sir Galahad.
Glad to see i'm not the only one obsessed about this movie....what's your take on Demarest's character...(spoiler)why doesn't he tell Hutton about them??
First of all, I think there are probably about 40,000 of us obsessed about this movie -- who were in 2nd through 5th grade when it originally came out. Most of us about 9 or 10 -- still in the 'magical thinking' stage where this might be possible even though we knew it wasn't supposed to be.
Although I (we, at this age) had been brought up to not really believe in ghosts, fairies, and other fantasy things, I was of the age begining to hear opinions other than those of my parents and teachers. We were of the age when we were starting to realize that what our parents and teachers said were only their beliefs, and sometimes reality was different than what they thought.
We were starting to be exposed to UFO accounts and 'true' ghost stories, and maybe this sort of thing (DOn't be afraid of the dark) COULD happen.
Every kid who had a T.V. on this channel when it aired was affected, I think. There's hardly been a day gone by that I don't think about it. Yet, oddly enough, I feel this movie enriched me, somehow -- because I know that little ghoulish things can be small and still very threatening. Though I've seen their faces clearly on various internet webpages (we weren't shown much in the movie and if you blinked or were looking away you missed it), I'll always imagine them as much creepier and much nastier than they were actually portrayed. And transformation into one of them or something equally as foul and dark has always seemed a possibility if they get you.
Not only could they take you away to dark and dismal places but they could make you smaller than you'd ever been in your born life (we were trying to grow up), and horribly UGLY (we were wanting to look attractive for the first time) and isolated from our peers, family and loved ones (we wanted to be accepted and loved). What could happen to us if this were true made us feel very vulnerable and insecure, especially since no one would believe us or help us if this were to happen to us,
Ah, but anyhow -- to answer your question --
Why was Hutton not warned by the caretaker earlier? I don't think anyone who knew about these things were really sure about their powers of being able to know what you did or said. What might they do if you told?
(nothing that didn't happen anyway, I guess)
These creatures were more than animals, as they seemed to be able to 'hide' in spaces not accessible to us, and could be anywhere. I think he was afraid of what the creatures might do to him. Kill him? Take him? 'convert/transform' him? Or, maybe he himself was just afraid of looking crazy.
If I were aware of such a reality, I might doubt my own sanity but try to usher people away from the threat by making more believable excuses for them to stay away. I'd believe Sally, of course, but probably let HER do the talking to her husband and hope he'd just see that she was having a breakdown and needed to be away from the house. If I said too much I wouldn't be believable even if Sally could coaborate my story.But most of all, I think, he feared the creatures themselves.
Being a nuts-and-bolts kind of guy, he probably just wanted to keep people clear of the menace to the best of his ability, but knew better than to 'get involved.' People would think HE was crazy, and THEY (the creatures) might kill him or take him.
And 'cause' never was the reason for the evening, --Or the Tropic of Sir Galahad.
I always thought the reason Demarist doesn't reveal anything to Hutton is because he had already been threatened by the creatures. When he went to gather his tools from the room with the fireplace they close the door and attack him slashing his arm with a screwdriver. "Remember what happens to those who tell?"they ask him. Í'd be keeping my mouth shut too!!