Yes but Star Trek owes it's rebirth to Star Wars.
WRONG. This is a common misconception. Plans had been under way for Trek's revival before
Star Wars ever hit theaters. SW's success merely made Paramount decide to scrap TV series plans and make the first Trek film. Now, admittedly, ST2:TWOK most likely may not have happened if not for SW. It is more accurate to say that Trek owes the
outstanding success of its revival to SW. By the same token, the series
Enterprise owes its
failure to newer shows such as
Babylon 5, Farscape, and
Stargate: SG-1. The Trek mold had been broken. The truth of the matter is that
Enterprise was Trek at its finest. It held the same fascination for me as the original series did. But in comparison to the other shows mentioned it was considered too dull; however, not by THIS Trekker; and I suspect by most Trekkers my age.
All the talk about the terrible writing was thrown about by younger sci-fi fans who thought either
Babylon 5,
SG-1 or
Farscape was THE sci-fi series of all time. Sure, both B5 and
Farscape had good runs, but neither can hold a candle to Trek's success. No spin-offs or movies except
The Peacekeeper Wars for Farscape. B5 had several successful TV Movies and one failed spin-off.
SG-1 has made an excellent mark for itself, however, with a spin-off and talk of a new theatrical film. I strongly doubt that very many Trek fans of
my generation disliked
Nemesis and
Enterprise as much as you seem to. These are some, of course, but not nearly as many as those of us who loved it.
"Funny how your feet, in dreams, never touch the Earth" -Nancy Wilson
reply
share