MovieChat Forums > Jeremiah Johnson (1972) Discussion > How did Del Gue not know...?

How did Del Gue not know...?


I just watched this again this weekend and noticed something that could be an error.

When Johnson meets up with Del Gue after Swan and Caleb are killed Gue knows that the indians are after Johnson but then he asks about the boy. Johnson never gives him a direct answer so Gue says "he stayed with the squaw all this time".

If he knows that the Indians are trying to kill Johnson and he assertains that they are doing it in a ritualistic manner, coming at him one by one, he should know why.

reply

The reason why Swan and Caleb were killed in the first place was that Johnson led the soldiers across the Crow burial ground,so it's possible that Del Gue was only aware of that as the reason for the Crow being after Johnson and not of the Caleb/Swan murders and Johnson's subsequent revenge killings.

reply

Del Gue asked because he was trying to sympathetically gauge Jeremiah's real feelings, which JJ always hides under a tough facade.

Based on Bear Claw's comments about his own relationship, and Del Gue's attitude when Jeremiah and Swan's marriage was first announced, squaw brides were not viewed with much emotional significance by most mountain men. That's why the "all this time" comment was made.

Also, children clearly were not a priority in their isolated lives.

Jeremiah acts stoic about the whole incident, and betrays no anguish about their deaths, but Del Gue suspects the truth that the audience already knows: that Jeremiah had stayed with Swan and the boy so long because he loved them like a family, and preferred that life to that of a wandering hermit.

Jeremiah's response about Swan that "She weren't no trouble" is a massive understatement of the love he felt for her, made to hide his pain from Del Gue.

At the end of the film, Bear Claw also sees through Johnson's falsely dismissive attitude about his misfortunes, when he responds to Johnson's "What trouble?" reply with a knowing glare.









reply