I’m surprised the film gets a fair bit of love, here. It’s all paper thin characters in a completely uninteresting story. I don’t know how they possibly stuffed the Segal/Leibman chemistry, but they did. It probably has a lot to do with Segal twiddling his thumbs for most of the film. Redford was a vacuum. The director should have focused less on pointless - and I’m sure costly – chopper shots, and actually worked with the resources at his disposal.
shareWow. Your review is about as empty as you accuse the film of being.
In what way - please give specific examples - are the characters "paper thin"? How, exactly, is the story "uninteresting"? You just saying these things doesn't make them so.
Please learn how to actually write a proper review before posting your unsubstantiated opinions.
'Unsubstantiated opinions'? Get real, kid.
share It was a good film representative of it's time. The cast is strong. It showed professional criminals of a different kind and I appreciated that.
Saw it for the first time in years on HBO the other day and I still love it
See some stars here
http://www.vbphoto.biz/
it holds up really well, and segal underplays brilliantly
share