In the context of a John Wayne Western and its audience, I concur that a sexual encounter would not have fit smoothly (as I indicated earlier), although had there been some discreetly handled sex initiation scene with one of the oldest boys, I do not feel that anything would have fallen apart.
But there was a fairly graphic sex scene involving a child (a young Mario Van Peebles) in 1971's Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song—an X-rated independent film intended primarily for urban black audiences, to be sure, but one that emerged as quite a big hit. And in The Beguiled (Don Siegel, 1971), Clint Eastwood's Union corporeal kisses a prepubescent girl on the lips and has a sex scene—tits-and-ass nudity included—with a character identified as seventeen years old—older and more sexually mature than the oldest boys in The Cowboys, yes, but not discreetly handled, either. The Beguiled flopped at the box-office (Eastwood's only non-hit prior to 1982 and one of only two box-office flops before the late eighties), but it was also about as esoteric and macabre of a film as a Hollywood studio has ever produced with a major male star.
http://www.chicagoreader.com/Bleader/archives/2012/11/27/exploring-the-obsessive-nature-of-don-siegel-and-clint-eastwoods-the-beguiled
So, yes, the 'safe' context of a Wayne Western would not have been the right vehicle, even if The Cowboys also challenges expectations in certain ways. On the other hand, an adolescent boy receiving his sexual initiation in a whorehouse (or a wagon) during a cross-country journey in a period piece is fairly conventional, so long as the encounter is filmed discreetly.
reply
share