Should be restored


I have a felling that this movie will be going under a major restoration for its 40th Anniversary Blu-Ray Release. It does need it.

reply

Agreed they should also beef up the sound, perhaps even give it a proper surround mix.

reply


Wow your so right. The DVD I have the color is weak. The sound is bad. The sound fades out where it shouldn't. What scares me is the fact that the movie has changed owners 4-6 times since it was made. So Who knows if the negative is in good shape?

reply

You do realise though that the original sound mix was deliberate to make the film feel old.

reply

THE PICTURE (not the souND) LOOKS BAD. The picture looks very soft and fuzzy where it was not intended.

reply

One of the problems with the DVD is that it doesn't appear to have been remastered prior to pressing; it looks very much as though it uses the same video master as was used for the last LaserDisc release in the 90's. At the very least, it should be remastered from the best film elements that can be located.

As for the look of the picture - and this is based upon multiple dozens of theatrical viewings going back to its original release - there are two distinct visual styles going on. The Kit-Kat Club numbers themselves are shot in a very vivid way; sharp and heavily saturated, almost hyper-realist. The non-musical scenes (and this includes footage inside the club of anything that isn't taking place on the stage) are presented in a more subdued, almost gauzy style. This is something which struck me upon my first viewing of the film, and I take it as a quite deliberate visual statement on Fosse's part, and which should be preserved by any restoration.


Poe! You are...avenged!

reply

Any word on a Blu-Ray release? Last night, I looked at the DVD for the first time and I was really disappointed by the picture quality.

This film is such a classic. It deserves a cleanup and remastering.

reply

Haven't heard anything.

CABARET falls into a category I call "stepchildren." You've heard of so-called "orphaned" films (those whose copyrights have not been renewed because the producing company has gone defunct, and they've fallen into the public domain)? Allied Artists, the original copyright holder, ceased production in the late 70's and their library was acquired by Lorimar, which in the late 80's, was in turn swallowed up by Warner Bros, who now has ownership of CABARET. So it's not exactly an "orphan," but WB treats it very much like a "stepchild," neglecting it in favor of their own, home-grown product.

This sort of thing happens a lot. Some studios, back in the day, acquired ownership from the producing studio of films they were remaking, and then literally locked the originals away to keep them from public view. MGM did this with the original versions of ROBERTA and SHOWBOAT, for example. Since the advent of home video, some studios have been smarter than others about their "stepchildrens'" marketability, and will happily take profit from wherever they can get it, no matter who the original producing company was.

About the only thing I can think of is for everyone who'd like to see a new, state-of-the-art release of CABARET to lobby Warner Home Video, and when enough do, maybe they'll see the light. Since the 40th anniversary of its release is coming up next year, this would be a particularly good time to do so.

Contacting TCM might help, too, since they have a sort of limited partnership deal with WB for exclusive marketing of some of their titles (via their "Vault" series), at least two of which - THE BIG CIRCUS and SOLDIER IN THE RAIN - were Allied Artists titles. They may also be favorable to the idea of a 40th Anniversary screening at next year's TCM Film Festival, and since such special presentations are often the impetus for some long-overdue restoration, this could also light a fire under WB.


Poe! You are...avenged!

reply

Thanks for your prompt reply and thorough explanation about "stephchildren" films.

I will follow up with your suggestion about contacting WHV and TCM regarding a remastered Cabaret.

reply

THE PICTURE (not the souND) LOOKS BAD. The picture looks very soft and fuzzy where it was not intended.
My point is that it was intended (both picture and sound).

Let Zygons Be Zygons.

reply

Yes it was intended but because the transfer was weak everything looked worse then intended.

reply

I see that Warner Home Video has announced that this DVD release is now "out of print." That could be a very good indicator that a newly-mastered Blu-Ray will be along next year.


Poe! You are...avenged!

reply

Well I was right (again) The film needed major restoration and WB did in fact restore the film!

reply