If white man panties are good enough for Clint
then dammit, they're good enough for me.
shareMan panties?
Kentoc'h mervel eget bezañ saotret
I'm just glad we didn't have to see another nude male rear end. I am still recovering from seeing Ryan O'Neal' s in "Partners."
shareuuuh there called "briefs" not panties, and many guys wear them everyday. shut the *beep* up.
Realism, Remakes and Unnecessary Sequels are ruining movies!
Exactly - in the 70s and 80s 90% or more of men wore briefs. I don't think anyone thinks of them as man panties. Are you saying it's more manly to wear baggy boxers? I guess you're not very well endowed so it doesn't matter if everything swings around!
shareIn my country, most men and boys wear briefs. Boxers are seen as shorts, not underwear.
Global Warming, it's a personal decision innit? - Nigel Tufnel
1971 I guess 90% of men wore white briefs, the rest boxers. No fancy colored briefs in those days for heterosexuals.
Ask any doctor and they tell you that support is important.
'No fancy colored briefs in those days for heterosexuals.'
-------
why, would they make you feel insecure about your sexuality? Absurd
'why, would they make you feel insecure about your sexuality? Absurd'
--------
You had to be there. I'm not sure they even sold colored briefs in most stores.
And nothing is better for a wedgy than tightie whities.
And don't forget the infamous "skidmark".
[deleted]
It wasn't threatening, it just wasn't something you gave any thought. The stores were 99% white briefs and that's what you bought.
share[deleted]
No fancy colored briefs in those days
[deleted]
I've always found briefs to be more conducive to being physically active. Baggy boxers don't do anything to keep you from swinging and flopping around when you move, not to mention they don't hold down erections. I don't really know what boxers are for, they seem kind of pointless. I suppose they might be okay for a guy who has tiny genitals.
share