the remake


Get Carter 2000 was pretty bad esp if U watch the original one. To fans of the original news of a remake was treated with disdain and when it came out it was as bad as they imagined it would be..

ideally it should'nt have been made but *beep* it they were gonna do it anyway so they should've done some things different :

-made it edgier, more violent, more killings, got Sly to be more like Caines Carter - Sly came off as just acting like a tough guy, not a real genuine one like Caine (no go around saying I'm gonna have to take this to next level etc), no silly goatee (also looked silly in EX1/2 in fact I kept thinking of Get Carter watching those due to the goatee..good that he's got shot of it for 3) also maybe itd have been better setting the remake in the UK with Sly coming over to London from USA and had someone like Guy Ritchie direct... at least that way it might've retained some of the originals feel/tone

reply

Total crap every remake is

reply

Actually i rewatched it not that long ago and now it doesn't seem that bad. I guess thats a comment on current movies

reply

The approach you describe is simply not in the cards for any movie made today. The original was made during the '70s, which is called the "auteur era" of film-making. Studios took a very hands off approach and gave directors carte blanche to do pretty much whatever they wanted. This produced a whole decade of gritty, and often very bleak films, as directors were deliberately following a subversive trend that was the opposite of the wholesome, heroic, idealistic films of the fifties and early sixties, which had had unabashed hero characters that audiences were meant to look up to.

In the '70s, you find tons of anti-heroes, like Carter, like Arthur Bishop in "The Mechanic" (note the remake of that movie also makes Bishop less sociopathic), Alex DeLarge from "A Clockwork Orange," Michael Corleone from "The Godfather" movies, Travis Bickle from "Taxi Driver," etc. etc. You simply don't find such unredeemed anti-heroes as protagonists in films today, and you haven't since the 1980s.

This is because the auteur era came to a screeching halt with the failure of Michael Cimino's "Heaven's Gate" in 1980. It went so hugely over budget, and then bombed so epically that it took down the studio that bankrolled it, United Artists, and made the studio executives unwilling ever to allow directors that degree of freedom again. And honestly, you can't really blame the studios after that; they run a business, and they have to make money to stay in business.

So today, studios are more involved. They know audiences like happier endings to stories, and more relatable and heroic main characters, and they almost always insist on that. So you simply won't see frankly sociopathic protagonists like the original versions of Jack Carter or Arthur Bishop in movies made today.

reply