While he is said in the first movie to have survived the crash, Phibes himself also claimed to be dead in both films. This is easily explained as a metaphoric use, his former life of happiness with his wife having ended with her death (and the crash), though his appearance doesn't hold up to that. Bad makeup effects notwithstanding, he seems too much of a dessicated corpse to be able to survive, clever machinations or not. And while seen to be eating and drinking, after a fashion, we do not see any aperature in the back of his neck into which he is actually placing such. The ambiguity is obviously intentional, and personally, while the unfocused and unfounded nonsense of other movies of the relative era and genre doesn't hold my interest, the way the Phibes movies deal with his existence is much preferred to more recent movies (and remakes) which seem to feel the need to over-explain everything to the audience.
I imagine it's already been proposed, but what if he really did die, and he's just a revenant kept alive via the use of some knowledge he gained in his arcane acoustical-religious studies? This might answer the mystery of Vulnavia, as well; perhaps he cut a metaphysical deal and has returned with an incarnation of Death accompanying him in the form of the lovely and transcendent (near-) mute? This would also add some extra meaning to the loving way he interacts with her (especially all that dancing), her mysterious appearance at the start of the first film and reappearance/disappearance in the second, and her change of actress (she simply incarnates in a new body). The extra irony of while she is apparently his servant, it is really quite the reverse situation, also suits her being Death. Of course, not explaining that on-screen also works, as if a viewer prefers she be clockwork or a clone or a mysterious cult member or whatever, she can be that, too.
reply
share