MovieChat Forums > When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth (1971) Discussion > About the monsters, and the effects

About the monsters, and the effects


The monsters depicted in When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth are among the best examples of stop-motion animation I've seen in any film. Accomplished by the underrated Jim Danforth, who always did excellent work, his models and animation easily rival those of the great Ray Harryhausen and in my opinion exceed RH's effects for the similar One Million Years B.C..

In almost all the animated scenes the monsters are about as flawless and realistic as has ever been achieved. Much as I admire Mr. Harryahusen it must be said that there was a small handful of people who could equal his skills and achievements in devising and animating creatures but who never quite got the breaks or recognition he did, of whom Jim Danforth was probably the most famous example.

Still, it strikes me that Danforth's large, unidentifiable prehistoric monster -- the one that befriends Sanna (Victoria Vetri) and even saves her at one point -- is extremely reminiscent of Harryhausen's classic Rhedosaurus in The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms. It's built the same, has an almost identical head, moves the same -- just too familiar a monster. It seems pretty clear that this alleged dinosaur, while extremely well done and animated, is very plainly patterned after the Rhedosaurus of the earlier film. This isn't meant as a knock, but I hope that Danforth intended it as a kind of tribute to the most famous figure in stop-motion animation, Ray Harryahusen.

Meanwhile, I believe the shots of live lizards masquerading as dinosaurs came from Irwin Allen's 1960 version of The Lost World, as anyone familiar with that earlier film might attest. You'll notice that all these lizard shots are somewhat compressed, because they had to be quickly and cheaply "squeezed" into conforming with the aspect ratio of WDRTE. This film was shot in an aspect ratio of 1.85:1, while The Lost World (1960) was filmed in the CinemaScope a.r. of 2.35:1 -- hence the need to compress the picture to fit the "wider" dinosaur/lizard footage into the frame of WDRTE. The unfortunate effect is to make the lizard footage look even more unreal compared to Danforth's excellent animation effects elsewhere.

Another problem arises with the constant back-and-forth switch between location footage and studio-made scenes throughout the movie; events supposed to be occurring sequentially in the same place are frequently depicted using Canary Islands locations mixed in with studio sets within the same scenes, which is obvious and disconcerting, including the mixing of real-ocean shots intermingled with obvious studio water-tank footage.

But despite some flaws, and a very few unconvincing shots, by and large the special effects in this film are extremely good, especially the monsters and animation devised by Jim Danforth. For such a modest-budget film, he should be congratulated on his ability to add such an outstanding degree of realism to an obviously fantastic and inherently unrealistic film.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Oh boy!

A topic I know quite a bit about!

Let’s talk dinosaurs!

Hammer Films had one of their biggest successes with ONE MILLION YEARS B.C. and in the old show business tradition of...”If they liked it once, they’ll LOVE it twice!!!” decided to do the whole thing all over again with THE CAVE GIRL, which was a treatment written by science fiction writer J.G. Ballard, The treatment had more “Flintstones” about it than it did “stone age”...it was a high key comedy with a cave village not unlike the one in Planet of the Apes.

Several drafts later (probably due to Hammer’s paranoia) the script was written to reflect an almost slavish copycat structure to One Million Years B.C. and called WHEN DINOSAURS RULED THE EARTH. The final shooting script was written by the film's director, Val Guest.

An antediluvian Romeo & Juliet.

Very few if any effects technicians in England could handle the type of animation effects that Harryhausen did for One Million Years (Ray Harryhausen himself was busy doing beginning work on THE VALLEY OF GWANGI) So they turned to America, and everybody they contacted said that...”Jim Danforth is the guy you want...he can do what Ray Harryhausen can do...”

So they got Jim and he agreed to do the picture.

Jim was a little disappointed that the powers that be had already designed the dinosaurs for the film but he WAS able to convince the producers to use a CHASMOSAURUS instead of the Styracosaurus they were intending to use...(They had a preliminary poster and the Styracosaur was on that) The Mother Dinosaur is NOT in any way supposed to be a Rhedosaurus (I know, I know, I thought it was a send-up when I first saw the film in the theater back in 1970).

Originally Jim suggested, for the mother dino, that they use a SCELIDOSAURUS and he showed them a painting by paleo-artist Neave Parker. The Hammer team wanted a more “komodo dragon” type of thing and what you see is the amalgamation of the two ideas.

So there ya go.

Jim designed all of the monsters and effects in the film but in order to facilitate them in a reasonable amount of time, he had, as his assistant, Roger Dicken, who did most (not all) of the dinosaur sculpting. Jim created the Mother Dino himself, though, from start to finish.

There was one very big problem with the special effects...

Producer, Aida Young.

Associate producer on One Million Years B.C., Ms. Young was bounced UP to line producer on When Dinosaurs, and she did not have the experience to handle this particular type of filming.

For one example, there was a scene in the movie where the Mother Dinosaur traps the hero, Tara (Robin Hawdon) behind a boulder....Young decided that a big fake boulder would be made and placed on a blue screen stage in London.

When on location, Jim Danforth discovered a big boulder that would be perfect and asked to shoot the live action there, that day, in the Canary Islands. Aida Young said no, because they had already begun making the fake rock in London.

“But I can set up the camera, split the screen. and drop the dinosaur in later!” begged Danforth, but nuthin’ doin’.

So the shot was a blue screen traveling matte set up with a fake boulder and a whole lot of optical work....much more time consuming and expensive than if Jim had shot it on location.

Another problem arose when some of the still standing sets from One Million Years were cannibalized and slightly redressed for use in When Dinosaurs. When Jim returned to London to begin effects work, he was shocked to find that the sets were too small to be used with dinosaurs dropped into them. To show a full dino image in those small sets, the creatures would have to have the image size on-screen of a Shetland Pony.

So...

For the wide shots, Jim painted glass art that expanded the sets. This took more time than was originally planned for, naturally, so they were now getting behind schedule.

A matte artist from Les Bowie’s effects company was brought in to do the three matte paintings originally designed for the film, but his work was far inferior to Danforth’s who took over the matte art too.

And he kept painting....and painting...

Three matte paintings became twenty seven matte paintings.

They were falling so far behind that Jim got permission to hire an animation assistant, David Allen, to come in and animate most of the Chasmosaurus sequence as well as several cuts of the dino baby and a cut or two of the giant crabs.

The pterosaur sequence almost didn’t make it to the final print. They were so far behind in production that the producers decided to start cutting things....there was a sequence involving giant ants and even though stop motion models were made, nothing was ever shot save for a couple of shots of stunt men with large plastic ants on their backs (one wound up in a Monty Python courtroom sketch)

Also edited was a giant carnivorous plant which was replaced by a six foot tall rubber jack-in-the-pulpit.

There was also scenes planned of battling sea monsters picked up by waterspouts and deposited on the shore during the tidal wave sequence and pterodactyls smashing into sand dunes and huts during the windy scenes at the end....things that would have been fun to see, but things that would be prohibitive to do because of time and money.

The pterosaur scenes (live action) were shot but since it was the “perfunctory” pterodactyl scene it was shelved until the producers discovered that they were woefully short on screen time and Jim was put to work on animating it.

Jim’s favorite creature in the movie was the baby dinosaur, and he talked about how that while most of these movies have the dinosaurs bellowing and fighting dirty, that it is always enjoyable to animate something that is pure character and non threatening.
“Of course it’s not even close to being a reality..” Jim said of the baby dino. “...and if people get disgusted and get up and walk out of the theater, well then we have failed.”

A funny story about the baby dino....Roger Dicken made the big plaster egg which it hatches out of....and he sealed the breakaway seams so well that when Jim started to animate the hatching scene, he couldn’t find the cracks!

Here are just three of the many reasons Jim Danforth was nominated for special effects.

1> Jim found out that when his animation camera got in really close, the texture of the rear screen behind the puppet dinosaur was visible. To eliminate this, he rigged a vibration device that canceled out the texture but kept the projected image in sharp focus.

2>For the scene where the curious Mother Dinosaur sees Sanna (Vickie Vetri) asleep in the egg, Jim suspended a miniature piece of egg shell in front of the projected image of the full scale egg so that the little piece looked like a piece of the big one. This gave the dinosaur something to bite on and jerk away...timed to the rotation of the real egg in the back projection. (ok, to be fair, Harryhausen did this first, in THE THREE WORLDS OF GULLIVER where the baby crocodile bites down on the “shield”.)

3> The pterosaur’s (Rhamphoryncus) wings are blurred....this gives a more smooth and realistic flapping effect. He blurred them by tapping the wings and taking the single frame of time exposure while the tips of the wings were wobbling slightly back and forth.

And I could go on...

Hell, I think I already have.

Akita!
http://www.woodywelch.com

reply

[deleted]

Hey, obit! Leave it to you to sniff out a dino discourse somewhere. Obit, meet wendybrad. Wendybrad, obit is the go-to guy for all sorts of information on these subjects...in case you hadn't noticed!!

But, obit, my dear man...did I detect a note of disparagement toward producers? Interfering with someone who knows what he's doing? Unheard of!

I didn't say the dino here was a Rhedosaurus...just sort of reminiscent of a quasi-Rhedosaurus. A Chasmosaurus? Before I read the entire thread I thought you were going to say that that was a real dinosaur. Glad to hear it's merely an amalgamation of...whatever. But I still think it looks a lot like the Rh by RH.

But I wish I had your store of knowledge. Really. Or should I say "fount"? Hey, Rhedosaurus, Chasmosaurus. As I've told wendybrad, from a country that boasts a creationist museum explaining how the world is 6000 years old and that men rode dinosaurs, When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth amounts to a documentary (except that they are all pagans who deserve to die). On the other hand, per one of your references, I was at times half-expecting Fred Flintstone to screech up in his car, sore soles and all.

Yabba-dabbakita!

reply

Well, it has to be understood that I'm really a fan of the original Godzilla -- the rampaging, pitiless monster that was a symbol of the atomic bomb. Over the years, as he became a kid-friendly superhero of sorts, to me he lost all meaning...though in more recent years they've backtracked a bit toward something closer to the original concept.

Also, I liked it when G was in black and white, which was only twice. It really suited his mood better than color.

With this as background, the Godzilla movies I own constitute my favorites, a couple of which I notice you don't have, and which I can certainly recommend....

Gojira (1954). Still the best Godzilla movie, no other comes close in my opinion. The original Japanese is by far the best, though the Americanized version, Godzilla, King of the Monsters (1956), isn't so bad.

Gojira no gyakushu/Godzilla Raids Again (1955). The first sequel. Actually only so-so, and obviously hurriedly made, but not bad and his only other b&w appearance. Definitely worth seeing, and I think, owning. The initial US version was idiotically called Gigantis, the Fire Monster (1959) because the genius producer thought not using the name Godzilla would make this more successful [!]. File under Huh?! The US title has long since been changed to GRA, which is closer to the Japanese title (which means Godzilla's Counterattack), but that aside it's otherwise the same film as Gigantis, right down to the fact that they still call the monster "Gigantis" throughout the movie even though the title now says "Godzilla"!

Mosura tai Gojira/Mothra Vs. Godzilla (1964). Terrific movie, probably the best after the original. Well-made and takes itself seriously. Very highly recommended. (The original US title was, in yet another mysteriously idiotic decision, Godzilla Vs. The Thing. The Thing? G could stomp James Arness. So stupid, since it served no prupose and everybody knew who Mothra was. Jerks.) The US version is sometimes called Godzilla Vs. Mothra. Guess it depends on who you think started it.

San daikaiju: Chikyu saidai no kessen/Ghidorah, the Three-Headed Monster (1965). Not strictly a Godzilla movie, but a great monster-mash uniting G, Mothra and Rodan to combat the titular alien creature. This was one of the last films that more or less took its subject seriously before G became too light, so it's worth it for that reason alone.

Kingu Kongu tai Gojira/King Kong Vs. Godzilla (1962). Amazing to think this was G's first screen appearance since ...Raids Again seven years earlier -- they even take care to dig him out of the same iceberg he'd been buried in at the end of the previous film. If you can get it, watch only the Japanese version. This isn't a great film but it is a key early one, but the dubbed version isn't as good, shifting the thrust of the movie from the original.

I think that's actually all the Godzilla movies I have. It's not that I don't like any of the others -- Destroy All Monsters, Son of Godzilla, Godzilla 2000 and a couple of others are good, and Godzilla is usually enjoyable under any circumstances (even in his poorer movies). But my hopeless prejudices keep me from adding them to the collection as I have the early ones. Just a fuddy-duddy zilla, I fear.

However, on a non-Godzilla level, allow me to recommend Sora no daikaiju Radon/Rodan, Mosura/Mothra, Bijo to ekitainingen/The H-Man, Uchu daisenso/Battle in Outer Space, Chikyu boeigun/The Mysterians, and especially Yosei Gorasu/Gorath, which to me was a real revelation, a terrific, fast-paced space invasion movie (with one token unnecessary monster), which is really well done and well-written for these things, an excellent and exciting movie, one of Toho's best, and somewhat inexplicably overlooked.

All these must be seen in their Japanese originals for best effect, though the Americanized Rodan is, I feel, in many ways better than the original -- recut and slightly altered to make it much more sensible and logical than the Japanese -- the only time I remember thinking a dubbed, recut version of any film may be better than an original.

Oh -- if Toho ever gets its courage back and releases its great 1955 abominable snowman movie, Jujin yuki otoko -- which will never happen -- try and see it. Apparently it's been sealed in the studio's vaults since the 70s because the Ainu of Hokkaido object to it as slandering them. I've never seen the original but it's supposed to be great. You can get some idea of it via the 1958 Americanized version called Half Human, which cut in scenes of John Carradine and Morris Ankrum discussing the snowman, interspersed with scenes from the original, not dubbed but with a voice-over narration by Carradine. I'd love to see the Japanese as it's supposed to be very good, and I'd really like to find out what it is the Ainu find so offensive.

reply

Hey, hob!

No, the Chasmosaurus was the horned dinosaur that came out of the cave...The producers wanted a horned dinosaur and Jim suggested that one because, well, nobody had done it before...we have seen our share of Triceratops and Styracosaurs.

The Mother dinosaur was based on the cobination of Jim's idea of using a Scelidosaurus ( a big fat armored dinosaur, similar to an ankylosaurus) and the producers' desire to have a monitor lizard type of thing...like a komodo dragon. That combo is what we see....

Here's a funny fun fact....how many dinosaurs are in WHEN DINOSAURS RULED THE EARTH?


Answer....one


The Rhamphoryncus (flying lizard) the plesiosaur, the fanciful mother dino and her baby, and the Tylosaurus that bumped the hero off the raft, all are prehistoric reptiles but are not classified in true dinosauria....only the horned behemoth. How anal retentive is THAT?!?


Back in 1976 (god, I'm old) I attended a special effects lecture by Danforth and I got to play with the horned Chasmosaur a bit....it was about the size of a house cat and, surprisingly, nowhere near as detailed as the GWANGI Styracosaurus that was made for Ray. Recently I saw a picture online that Jim had taken of the Chasmosaurus and just about all of the foam rubber had fallen off its ball-in-socket metal armature....only the head was intact. The Chasmosaur and a plaster positive of the baby dino had resided in Forry Ackerman's house for years!

http://www.woodywelch.com

reply

One more thing...I know i talked about this in some other thread but I can't find it and this seems to be a perfect place to repeat it...

In the begining of the film's preproduction, in one of the earliest meetings, Jim Danforth brought along a gleaming, chromed stop-motion armature for a ceratosaurus which was a bipedal flesh eating dinosaur, similar to an allosaurus except the ceratosaurus had a horn on his nose.

Anyway, Jim proudly produced the 24 inch long armature from his case and sat it on the table, figuring, if you're going to do a dinosaur movie, you're going to need a flesh eater!

Producer Aida Young took one look at the metal skeleton and said..."Oh, NO, Jim, we aren't having any of THOSE types of dinosaurs in our film! They look like a poof in high heels!"

A "poof" being a rather derisive slang in Britain for a homosexual.

True story...

http://www.woodywelch.com

reply

You talked about Aida but not that story...but it sounds in keeping with her general obtuseness.

Yeah, my girlfriend's British, and "poof" has long been known to me. I once wrote some piece using the name "Lord Poofster" for one of those upper class British twits. Classy.

And thanks for all the additional dino info on the prior post! Meanwhile, back to The Lost Missile....

reply

I've seen a kids dinosaurs documentary called Dinosaurs:Fun, Fact & Fantasy (made years ago now) which contained several clips from old dinosaurs movies, including a few-second-long clip showing the Chasmosaurus from "When Dinosaurs" fighting what looks like a T-Rex or other flesh-eating dinosaur. I never saw that in the film, so I wondered if maybe the Chasmosaurus was used in anything else.

reply

"Well, it has to be understood that I'm really a fan of the original Godzilla -- the rampaging, pitiless monster that was a symbol of the atomic bomb. Over the years, as he became a kid-friendly superhero of sorts, to me he lost all meaning...though in more recent years they've backtracked a bit toward something closer to the original concept."

Hey Hob, I just wanted to chime in RE: 'The Big G'--...Been a fan of Big G(and the rest of the Toho stable of talent) from way back...even of those silly kid friendly trifles of the 60s & 70s--(oddly enough I have NEVER see GRA)but You have to try out some of the newer Godzilla flicks---I have seen bits on YouTube(NOT the whole film mind you) but it looks like the better budget & effects really do justice to the original vision of 'G' as the unstoppable atomic disaster on two legs---heck the new 'death breath' effect will make your jaw drop...you could say he's like the Hulk with scales-you DON'T want to piss him off; it give G a certain quality that Tristar Zilla could NOT capture...G was NOT just some overgrown lizard--he was GODZILLA, KING of the Monsters--a force of nature as irresistible as a hurricane or an earthquake...

nm

reply

Hi nickm -- yeah, I agree that G has gotten closer in recent years to what he was in the beginning, which is a point I made above. I think the most recent G flick I've seen is Godzilla 2000, and that was really well done...although I've only seen the dubbed American version, and the big problem today is that they use real, bland American voices instead of accented Asian actors to provide the dubbed voices, which is a major negative for me. I'm actually thinking of buying the original Japanese version of that one, and maybe a couple of other recent G films.

You definitely should see Godzilla Raids Again. As I said, it's not a great film, but it is the only other G movie of the 50s and in b&w, and is closer in spirit to the incomparable original than most if not all the other films.

But -- Classic Media has taken all their discs (the ones with both the Japanese and Americanized versions) off the market, just in the last couple of weeks. None of us knows what's up. Apparently you can still buy them at the Classic website, or order from Amazon marketplace and I guess ebay, but why all these (including the original Gojira as well as GRA, all the other Godzilla movies, plus Rodan/War of the Gargantuas) have suddenly been pulled is a mystery.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Hi wendybrad -- if you mean the awful, dreadful, stupid, insipid, moronic, brain-dead, asinine, idiotic, insulting, lousy, incompetent, inept, unbearable, unwatchable, ridiculous, boring, inane, imbecilic, stupefying, annoying, cruddy, unnecessary, screwed-up, jerk-water, bubble-headed rip-off piece of junk trash garbage waste of good film stock made in the US in 1998...mmmm, no, no, I don't much care for it.

reply

[deleted]

Think I used too many adjectives? Anyway, I disliked it because it basically looked on its subject matter as a joke, plus I did not like the "revised" Godzilla. The CGI effects were basically good but wrapped in a [your insulting adjective here] movie. Terrible script, good actors wasted. Piece of junk.

There is and will only be one Godzilla/Gojira. Well, with suit variations.

Thanks for the links! I'll check them out later if I may. Right now it's after 3:30 AM here in New York and I assume I should go to bed. To dream, no doubt, of Godzilla. Have a beautiful New Zealand fall day!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Sure. Atragon (1963) concerns a plot by the undersea Mu Empire to return to the surface of the Earth and conquer it. The only person who can foil it is an embittered Japanese admiral who has invented a fantastic superweapon, a submarine called the Atragon. Eventually he comes around and unleashes his craft against the Muans, who have been causing major worldwide destruction. I've only seen this movie once but it was pretty good as Toho's 60s films go, as much fantasy as sci-fi. The original title is Kaitei Gunkan, which means "Undersea Battleship".

The Mysterians (1957), with which I'm much more familiar, is about a race of marauding space invaders who land in Japan (of course), and after unleashing a giant robot (pretty cool), demand first land to live on, then Earth women with whom to mate. Naturally, the Earth unites to retaliate. It's also a big-scale, typical Japanese sf epic. Original title: Chikyu Boeigun ("Earth Defense Forces").

Both films are definitely worth catching. I would also recommend Gorath (Yosei Gorasu, or "Death Star Gorath", 1963), a great Japanese sf film about a meteor threatening Earth. Great effects and a better plot than most such films. When I saw it again the other year, decades after seeing only a part of it, I was really blown away by how good and enjoyable it is. Tough to find, though.

PS -- Do you remember who it was who's been deleted above on this site?

reply

[deleted]

Ah, well. We're still here.

reply

I finally saw this movie and was amazed by the FX too!

reply