Is this the most attractive Frankenstein's monster ever?
He's certain better looking than the 1931 original.
sharehttps://cache.moviestillsdb.com/i/500x/b3zodp46/the-horror-of-frankenstein-lg.jpg
share
MovieChat Forums > The Horror of Frankenstein (1971) Discussion > Is this the most attractive Frankenstein...
Hell no. I'ma have to go with Aaron Eckhart:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/07/20/article-2371172-1AE66DE7000005DC-145_634x598.jpg
And Victor Perez:
https://pixhost.icu/avaxhome/19/3b/00243b19_medium.jpeg
Yeah, but they don't really look like the infamous monster. I mean this one has the square head and everything, but he's kinda sexy.
shareIn the BBC's Frankenstein: The True Story (1973), the monster was played by Michael Sarrazin and at the beginning looked normal. Later, as his treatment gradually failed, he began to look more monster like.
He was deemed a very good looking bloke at the time so I'm gonna say he wins the award for most attractive monster.
Yes, but as the monster, with the blockhead and bolts on his neck, this monster looks pretty good, comparative to the 30's creature. Sarrazin in the beginning and these other guys played the monster without all the "monster" physical effects.
shareI'd say the Monster was his most attractive in The Munsters because Herman was able to get a job and be productive in society. None of the other Frankenstein Monsters would have been hired
shareHerman was an affable bloke, never tried to strangle anyone or toss children into a lake. I'd hire him.
share