Clint's hair


Surely Clint's hair style wouldn't pass muster for a German officer? A little too rock 'n' roll. Do you think he refused to have it cut?

reply

Probably...

But then Burton's hair was very thick at the back, not the sort of style for any man's army!

reply

Good point - and in that vein(yes, I know they were enemy agents, but they're SUPPOSED to be elite British paratroopers)Thomas' Herman's Hermits cowcurl, or Christiansen's Hasselhoff-baiting perm.

Awesome film.

:O)

reply


"Hasselhoff-baiting perm." That is very well played sir. You may advance 3 spaces. Golf clap is in order.




I can eat 50 eggs - Cool Hand Luke

reply

It's probably difficult to ask stars of their calibre to cut their hair for a film.

Eastwood also refused to call Smith "Boss" as he does in the novel, and never once expressed his hatred toward horses (also in the novel). There's also an exchange with Smith about the electric fence that's switched around to bring his intelligence into play.

reply

McClean wrote the movie script before developing it into a novel.

reply

It's probably difficult to ask stars of their calibre to cut their hair for a film.


Moreover, the filmmakers here was not exactly taking a documentary-style approach to this film. Indeed, I doubt that they even considered asking Eastwood to cut his hair.

Eastwood also refused to call Smith "Boss" as he does in the novel, and never once expressed his hatred toward horses (also in the novel). There's also an exchange with Smith about the electric fence that's switched around to bring his intelligence into play.


Alistair MacLean didn't write the novel until after the film (a 'novelization,' technically); Where Eagles Dare represented his first original screenplay. Once he came to write the novel, MacLean could engage in more creative freedom, knowing that he was no longer writing for a movie that would feature two major stars.

reply

The women's hair and make-up also did not represent the 1940s. It is obvious that this film is from the 60s. This is something I have noticed in many movies and TV shows filmed in the 60s. It did not matter what the time period was, the women always had 60s' hairdos.

reply

[deleted]

It was actually pretty short for Eastwood. I don't think it's his best look, but still über-cool.

reply

Mmm, I think it was pretty typical of how Eastwood wore his hair in the 60's, in films like the spaghetti westerns, Hang 'em High, Coogan's Bluff, and Paint Your Wagon.

He wore it a little longer in the 70's in films like Dirty Harry, Play Misty for Me, Joe Kidd, and High Plains Drifter.

reply

If you think that his hair is too long, check out the 'Gestapo' officer in a ludicrous black uniform at the bar in the village - looks like a Beatle wig!

reply

Which is why I admired John Cassavetes for cutting his hair really short(at the height of the sixties long hair boom) for his role in "The Dirty Dozen" , which lent credibility to his character along with his great acting skills.

reply

Which is why I admired John Cassavetes for cutting his hair really short(at the height of the sixties long hair boom) for his role in "The Dirty Dozen" , which lent credibility to his character along with his great acting skills.


If you look at any big star (so a lot more conspicuous than Cassavetes was) who considered himself a serious actor through the Sixties, who had his own image to maintain -- talking about Paul Newman, Steve McQueen, Rock Hudson, Tony Curtis, Rod Steiger, Sidney Poitier, Jack Lemmon and on and on -- NONE of them took to adopting a Beatle cut for their movies just because it was the (passing) fashion. I think this had as much to do with being their own person and sustaining their own look as with credibility for their roles in being able to play an "everyman".

reply

If you look at any big star (so a lot more conspicuous than Cassavetes was) who considered himself a serious actor through the Sixties, who had his own image to maintain -- talking about Paul Newman, Steve McQueen, Rock Hudson, Tony Curtis, Rod Steiger, Sidney Poitier, Jack Lemmon and on and on -- NONE of them took to adopting a Beatle cut for their movies just because it was the (passing) fashion. I think this had as much to do with being their own person and sustaining their own look as with credibility for their roles in being able to play an "everyman".


... yeah. A Beatle cut was going to be more youth-oriented, anyway. Someone around the age of forty, such as Paul Newman, was not going to be looking to appeal to fourteen-year old girls.

reply

Which is why I admired John Cassavetes for cutting his hair really short(at the height of the sixties long hair boom) for his role in "The Dirty Dozen" , which lent credibility to his character along with his great acting skills.


The 'sixties long hair boom' didn't really affect most of Hollywood, or most of America, until the 1970s. In 1966, when MGM shot The Dirty Dozen, hardly any Americans, especially beyond teenagers and the small number of hippies and rock musicians, sported long hair.

reply

Well he is blonde.......

reply

[deleted]