LA GUERRA HA TERMINADO


75 years ago the Spanish Civil War came to its end.
Ever wonder why Franco did not involve Spain in WWII, apart from the Blue Division in the USSR? William Shirer and others assume that Hitler was not willing to grant the demands that FF asked for in exchange for his aid, but I do not believe that was the real reason. Consider: what was Franco that AH and Mussolini were not? A professional military man who had risen through the ranks and had won two wars, something that was not the case with Hitler and BM. That meant that he was very conscious of the big mistake that the Germans, Italians and Japanese committed during WWII: they dissipated their strength by fighting in too many fronts at once. That was contrary to what FF had done in his war: he would fight one battle at a time until it was won, and only then would he move to another battle, and if the Republicans tried to take the offensive in battles such as Teruel and the Ebro he would stop everything else and concentrate fully on those battles until the Republicans had been beaten back. The results prove that that was the right policy for victory, instead of the Axis' policy of spreading their forces too thinly by fighting in too many battles at once, a policy that Franco obviously foresaw would lead to defeat.
Hugh Thomas says that Spain will never recover from the 1936-39 War because that war transformed the country. Imagine what a wreck Spain would be if it had also had to endure WWII and, perhaps, being a satellite of Stalin and his successors.

God is subtle, but He is not malicious. (Albert Einstein)

reply

A tenuous thread.
The Allied Forces were just as thinly spread, more so in the first couple of years but we won!

reply

The Allies had DOUBLE the resources that the Axis had, both in manpower and in materiel.

God is subtle, but He is not malicious. (Albert Einstein)

reply

i have read that there are two situations in which franco would have taken up with the axis... that he did not is a purely pragmatic move. ideologically he very much agreed with the axis. he essentially was in a position similar to mussolini's where he had a country with a weakened economy but simultaneously desired to be a part of the war; he had better foresight than mussolini, however. i feel you are correct that in his capacity as a military officer he had a better view of the situation, but that also made it likely that he saw that spain's military was not up to the same standards as the modern armies of the rest of europe and paled next to other nations. for instance it had a very small tank force and many of these tanks were already outdated. to compare, in 1940 belgium had a greater number of modern tanks than spain. however franco would have gladly gone against the allies if the situation went a little more in the axis' favor.

one must keep in mind that portugal still had its very old treaty of alliance with britain, the oldest alliance in the world (now over 600 years old!) and one that had been invoked in the previous world war. salazar, portugal's prime minister, chose to keep portugal neutral in the war and this was a move much applauded by winston churchill because it was key in keeping the iberian peninsula neutral; if portugal joined the allies then spain certainly would have joined the axis. this is all according to the historian max hastings BTW. franco was planning a conquest of portugal during the war while the rest of the continent's attention was elsewhere, but decided against it.

second of all franco was quite prepared to enter the war but it was contingent on further axis success against britain. if the italians had success against the british in egypt and libya in 1940-1941 then he would likely have joined, but as it was this was considered the first big british land victory of the war and went a long way in convincing not only franco but the world that they could hold out and keep fighting.

baby can you dig your man?
he's a righteous man.

reply