Ullmann's eyes


I just had to post this. When I first saw this film years ago I was overwhelmed by the scene in which Anna talks about life with her husband and relates the accident (or whatever it was) that killed him and their son. I still am.
Noting that the writing for that scene is extraordinary, was any one else as astonished by Ullman's acting in that scene as I was?
It's all in her eyes. First of all, her eyes capture the turquois of the chair she's sitting in making them even bluer than nomal. Then when she starts discussing the accident her clear eyes slowly becomed rimmed red with tears. To date that bit of acting stands for me as a towering achievement for a single scene by any actor ever.
Or am I being hyperbolic?

reply

Call me crazy but the same occurred to me. There is even a place in the film where her eyes appear to be violet. Odd thing is, the violet tint extends beyond her irises which makes me think that perhaps the film was retouched to enhance Liv Ullman's eyes which puzzles me since her eyes are so beautiful to begin with. I think this film took place around the time she & Bergman were having an affair but my chronology might be off.

Anyway it's just a crazy idea.

--------------------
Call me Bubbles, everybody does.

reply

I'm going back to look for the violet now.
Bergman and Ullmann actually broke up around the time they were making "A Passion."
Their romance started three films earlier, during the filming of "Persona."

reply

i consider ullman to hands-down be the greatest film actor to ever live. i don't know how many films i've seen with her that i've forgotten to keep up with the subtitles because i was so distracted by how expressive her face is.

reply

The thing about Liv Ullman in the Bergman films is that even though she plays different characters, she consistently does so with a heightened femininity. And expressiveness. She is an incredibly impressive actor.

reply

I found her eyes, her face, so full of expression and emotion! Bergman feels content to plant his camera in front of her face and just linger there as a scene unfolds.


------- __@
----- _`\<,_
---- (*)/ (*)------- ----__@
--------------------- _`\<,_
---- -----------------(*)/ (*)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~nec spe,nec metu

reply

I'm having a mini Liv Ullmann / Ingmar Bergman film festival at my house this summer, and I would not argue with anyone who says she's the greatest actress of our time. (I don't necessarily agree -- I think that Jane Fonda in the days of "Klute" and "They Shoot Horses, Don't They?" and Diane Keaton in "Shoot the Moon" and her other sexually adventurous roles, and Bette Davis and Katharine Hepburn at their peaks in the 1930s and 1940s are worthy candidates.)

reply

pax,

I consistently rate Ms. Ullmann among the very best actresses in film history. But... not the very top, as I tend to put her around fifth.

She is perhaps the best at overall expressiveness. And I also found her personally to be very attractive. But I wonder to what extent credit goes to Bergman for her performances, and in that connection it is troubling she had no great success with other directors. (In this context her admitted great success in theater is not directly relevant.)

Keeping it to my personal preference, my favorite all time is Joan Fontaine, who I find combines an intensely convincing emotional realism (ESPECIALLY for her time - I think she could only go so far in advancing a more modern approach given the realities and conventions of her time) with not only an intensely beautiful appearance but an extremely appealing manner and personality. Add in great intelligence and at least the perception of being nice, good company and sexual in an authentic sense, and those descriptions also largely fit Ms. Ullmann (who otherwise would not come to mind, heh, I would think for most as one like Ms. Fontaine). Same for another of my favorites, Diana Rigg.

But all those including Vivien Leigh, another big favorite, suffer when compared to the actress I think was objectively best in an overall sense, including the size and range of her overall work, and that for me has to be Bette Davis. The range of Ms. Davis's work, her consistently good performances over decades, even when considering due to conflicts with the studio her fallow periods, puts her at the top of an "objective" ranking, I think.

Fwiw my top twenty all time:

Joan Fontaine
Diana Rigg
Bette Davis
Vivien Leigh
Liv Ullmann
Jeanne Moreau
Greer Garson
Bibi Andersson
Carole Lombard
Monica Vitti
Maureen O’Hara
Ingrid Bergman
Joan Crawford
Meryl Streep
Liz Taylor
Gene Tierney
Lauren Bacall
Ingrid Thulin
Ava Gardner
Harriet Andersson


reply

She's just wonderful.

reply