The Aerial Combat etc Disappointing
The dog fights and the airfield bombing could have been better. The special effects in Tora Tora Tora were better.
shareThe dog fights and the airfield bombing could have been better. The special effects in Tora Tora Tora were better.
shareB0B was made years before Tora Tora Tora.
The effects were very immersive for 1969.
Aerial combat was on par with TopGun - passable.
Not true. Tora, Tora, Tora came out in 1970, slightly less than one year after Battle of Britain. But I actually like the air battles in BOB more than the other film. In fact, I still consider it my favorite film on WWII air battles. For WWI, my favorite remains The Blue Max.
shareGenerally the special effects in Tora Tora Tora were better. The bombing of the airfield for example was much better than in BOB, it looked like they were using real planes and blowing them up, whereas in BOB the planes on the ground just sort of collapsed in the middle like they were cardboard or something flimsy.
shareThe thing I did not like about Tora, Tora, Tora, was when the Vale dive bombers were flying straight and level near the ground while dropping their bombs on the airfields and ground installations. In real life, they would dive and release their bombs like the German JU-87s.
shareThe scene of the Heinkels being attacked by the Spitfires while attacking northern England is one of my favourite parts of the movie. Excellent music and excellent filming. When the Spit does the victory roll over the airfield, it makes me proud to have been a member of the RAF.
shareI didn't like the scenes where models were used as much as I liked the scenes where actual aircraft flew in simulated combat - absolutely thrilling. And when Tevor Howard jumps out of that Hurricane, you really get a sense of just how big that fighter actually was.
"Spitfires, Messerschmitts and Heinkels oh my....!"
I love the scene where the ME-109s bounce the Spitfire squadron. They first show the ME-109s peeling off for the attack, then next scene shows the ME-109s are hurling down on the British, and then final scene is where the Germans open up on the Spitfires with deflection shooting while the Spitfires are still trying to break formation. It was beautiful!!!
shareThe aerial combat in Battle of Britain was disappointing in comparison to what other flying movies made before 1969?
shareThe airfield bombing, strafing runs and Stuka (they ARE models) shots ARE weak by modern standards and were so-so for 1969 - some of the timing of ground explosions compared to the aircraft attacking are mistimed. To the reviewer who thought that some of the ground explosions of aircraft looked like cardboard... Well even in 1969 when the warbird movement was in its genesis - people recognized that blowing up real aircraft was not on. But those Hurricanes being blown apart - the fuselage of a Hurricane was wood and canvas - it looks pretty good.
But you do a REAL dis-service suggesting the dogfights are weak. Real pilots flew real planes behind a camera plane flying the real tactics of the era. It is NOT whizz bang special effects of modern movies. But the tactics are authentic and one pilot died a real death during the filming flying those tactics. The climactic sequence has over 27 real aircraft on screen at the one moment - dogfighting like crazy. Given those the had just flown out of shot and those that were about to fly into shot it is pretty apparent the producers put a huge amount of effort into getting a mass of planes in the air in the confusing swirl of a dogfight. Read any book on the making of the movie and you will find that for every 20 seconds of film shot it took a whole day of planned and co-ordinated flying to pull it off.
There WAS one effect I always considered a bit weak. The cockpit shot of a Spitfire head up display orange gunsight ring as a Me 109 was gunned down. Shame on me - I later learned that the "effect" was produced by flying a rare two seat Spitfire - with camera in front seat and a real gunsight illuminated while a pilot who could barely see over the camera flew formation on the 109 from the back seat. Having since acquired a working gunsight I now realize the "effect" was 100% authentic and have all the more admiration for those who flew in the real battle 1940 and again in 1968 recreating the battle.
SWJG, I agree with what you say about the special effects in this movie. Like you, I consider this movie loads better than most of the modern movies portraying aerial combat. Movies today rely too much on computer graphics, and computer graphics hasn't quite got it right, so it always looks a bit off and gamelike. Those who suggest the dogfighting weak have probably not seen enough of real airplane fly. It has always amazed me the amount of work going into this movie to make the fighting authentic. The producers even hired men who fought in the real Battle of Britain, such as Adolf Galland, Robert Wright and Douglas Bader, as technical advisors. So I am pretty sure the action is as good as a movie can reproduce. It just goes to tell you, there is no substitute for the real thing. Too bad they don't make movies like this any more.
Agreed. The trouble with CGI combat is that its too tempting for the director to say something like... "lets get those planes a bit closer as it will make it more exciting"... and before you know it you have something that looks pretty good but is not real, even if most people watching think it is (a bit like the beach landing scene in SPR). Try and do the same effect with real aircraft it just isn't possible or realistic.
shareI`ve always thought that the aircraft in `Tora Tora Tora` tended to fly somewhat lower than would have been sensible (exept for the torpedo planes) during the actual attack but was done because it looked better on camera. And of course with CGI available this got even worse in the more recent `Pearl Harbor` with Zeros making `Death Star` runs between closely spaced warships.
I also wince every time I watch the scenes in Tora where the PBY`s blow up or the B-17 lands on one wheel as I cant help thinking how much those aircraft types are worth today!
At least it would appear that the P-40`s used were mainly non flying replicas, though even there I gather that they were 1940`s veterans that had been lying about a Hollywood backlot for years. They had been originaly built for the old John Wayne film `Flying Tigers` using original P-40 components.
Both films have excellent effects for the time and, on the whole I can live with the obvious wooden exploding Spitfires in Battle since "no real Spitfires were harmed during the making of this picture".
I found out recently that in `Tora Tora Tora` what appears to have been the last surviving example of a Douglas A-20 Havoc was destroyed in one of the exploding hanger sequences, and you hardly even notice it on film!
"Any plan that involves loosing your hat is a BAD plan."
You could easily detect their having copied up the fighters and whatnot, but considering it being 1969 one cannot complain.
shareA movie featuring the aerial combat of Battle of Britain with the ground attack sequences of TTT would have been sweet. While I feel that the action sequences of TTT are bigger, tighter and more polished technically, the aerial photography in BoB is brilliant and I admire the skill and dedication of the producers of BoB to do what they did with all those planes, editing the footage together, the locations - a tremendous effort. A great showcase of classic aircraft too.
shareActually the "Douglas A-20" destroyed in the hangar was a left over North American B-25J from the John Wayne movie "In Harm's Way". They took off the twin rudders and fins and modified it to have a single rudder and fin.
The P-40s were not left overs from the "Flying Tigers" but fiberglass fuselages copies from a real P-40, with Beechcraft C-45 wings.
Sorry I am something of a geek about Tora3 aircraft. I always thought the aerial footage was better in BoB. Too much of Tora's footage was from the ground and not enough from the air. The biggest problem with BoB was not enough Hurricanes, too many Spitfires, and only Me109s and He101s. I understand that could not be helped because of what aircarft were available and what just didn't exist anymore.
My problem with the airfield bombing was the detonation rate. We see tens of bombs per second fall out of the aircraft and yet they explode on the ground at less than one per second.
shareI think its brilliant. They never had things like the technology to film intense dogfights like in Top Gun, or CGI back then.
Also with Tora Tora Tora much of it was filmed from the ground because it was a ground assault where BOB was mainly from the air. They used a mix of real aircraft, studio models and huge scale remote controlled planes.
I'd like to see a CGI remastered version, but only to the level where some of the etched in explosions are replaced with CG and a few tracer lines where you see the tracers whizzing out to the target and blowing a few chunks off like you see in old ww2 footage.
Aside from that i wouldnt touch the film its near perfect.
I thought the flying looked absolutely great but some of the exploding planes were a little too obvious as a film trick. The airfield bombing may not have been up to par, but the scenes of London under attack made up for it in spades.
shareIt's a long time since I saw TTT, so cannot comment.
My son is in his ATC Battle of Britain day parade today, so last night we watched the movie (again!).
I have to say I think the dog fight scenes are still amazing. Sure the stukas are models and some of the aerial explosions are RC aircraft, but even some of these are pretty convincing. The final HE111 crash into the sea at the climax of the Battle for the air sequence looks pretty good IMHO.In the same sequence you see a spitfire crash into a beach , which is also well done. Incidentally it has the only dialogue in that portion of the film, and you realise that the WAF wireless operators must have heard the last moments of many young.men
The thing which is still breathtaking and was more so when shown on a large west end cinema screen is the 'maelstrom' scenes where planes are weaving everywhere. This is unique in any film I can think of, and couldn't be done today. I know there are probably more spitfires flying now, but not as many ME109/HE111 , albeit the Spanish versions.
I have the 2-disc DVD with optional Walton score, and this seems to have a few scenes I don't remember from the cinema. It could be my memory but there seem to be more shots of a cockpit view of a line of wingmen. This is usually of 109's but these show how close the aircraft flew.
I think the only way the film could be improved with CGI is how "Dark Blue World" did it, with cgi tracer and cartridge case effects added to original unused BoB scenes.
I noticed that a number of aircraft that were in death spirals had a long cable trailing from them... were those large scale modles that were pulled into the air like gliders ?
and then set on fire or had rigged explosives in them ?
All the destroyed aircraft in the air were pretty large R/C controlled models- I suspect any cable you saw was an aerial. They blew them up using condoms filled with petrol. There's a few of the orginal models still around, but most were destroyed during or after the movie, I've seen photos of the Heinkels on a bonfire- sad!
"Trust me. I know what I'm doing."
[deleted]