Beauty is a matter of taste, I think she was good-looking but not stunningly beautiful.
I also think she wasn't at all sexy, and of course that little problem was compounded by her co-starring with Dick Van Dyke. He wasn't just not-at-all-sexy, he radiated a kind of anti-sexual charisma, which drained all the sex appeal out of anyone sharing a scene with him.
Hey, no need to be rude, and I don't mean I find 'the spoiled rich girl type' attractive as girlfriend material (I prefer down-to-earth and relatable women when it comes to a potential partner).
Besides, there are worse fetishes.
My fetish, if one can call it that, is seeing lovely women spoiled and pampered and treated like princesses. You might think it's weird but surely that's far better that plenty of other fetishes.
Dick Van Dyke. He wasn't just not-at-all-sexy, he radiated a kind of anti-sexual charisma, which drained all the sex appeal out of anyone sharing a scene with him.
Dick was/is fun, funny, amiable and goodhearted. But he wasn't one-dimensional, as shown in the Columbo flick "Negative Reaction" (1974) where he effectively played the cunning murderer with hottie JoAnna Cameron (aka Isis) as his assistant and blossoming girlfriend.
reply share
His wife Arlene Silver evidently disagrees with you; so did his former wife of 36 years, Marjorie Willett, before their falling out; not to mention thousands of women around the globe in prior decades, probably millions.
Sexy Lorna (JoAnna Cameron) in that Columbo episode was definitely hot for him.
Chitty Chitty Bang Bang is a great movie. It still stands up today. Awesome songs, awesome characters, scary baddies, a wonderful leading man, and even the kids aren't annoying.
Sure Sally Ann Howes looks great in the film, and I love her character, a haughty spoiled rich girl with a heart of gold, but to say she's the only reason to watch this kids' classic is absurd.
And I've seen your other thread; The Child Catcher is not an anti-Semitic caricature. I certainly never took him that way, and I take anti-Semitism extremely seriously. But what are you saying here? That we can't have films featuring baddies who target children, because of the anti-Semitic blood libel tropes? That we can't adapt anything written by a wonderfully imaginative children's writer like Roald Dahl because of a few unfortunate anti-Semitic comments he made? What a sad society that would be.