I went to watch this movie with as low of expectations as possible (I was only interested to see young and beautiful Jane Fonda) as I was still shocked how horrible this movie was. Literally the only thing of value in this movie are Jane Fonda's looks.
shareI thought it was pretty entertaining and fun.
shareIt's a great and entertaining movie. But try Transformers by Michael Bay. It has beautiful women too and is much easier to understand.
shareHyperbole alert!!
shareYOU HAVENT WATCHED ENOUGH MOVIES...TRY GUS VAN ZANT'S LAST DAYS...YOULL BE BEGGING FOR SOME BARBARELLA GOODNESS.🙂
shareyou are no fun
shareThis was a sexual revolution movie. Hard to understand if you are not from that time.
From 1940-mid 60's women were supposed to be demure, overt sexuality was taboo.
This movie was a slap in the face to that thinking. Not a great movie that is for sure, but really a movie about sexuality.
(Fonda was really hot)
You're probably right, but there isn't anything to "understand" in what you just said. This movie isn't any kind of a puzzle. It's just a dumb cheap flick for male eyes.
shareThe understanding is this;
How society views movies differs with generational attitudes, which are constantly in flux.
This movie was prized by the 'hip' women of the 1960's as a example sexual liberation.The 'stuffy old' were horrified by the blatant sexuality.
For today's generation, this movie just looks like sexist fare for male eyes.
I loved it! Jane Fonda is so hot, and later would be hotter posing on a tank!
share