MovieChat Forums > Wait Until Dark (1967) Discussion > One thing that bothers me

One thing that bothers me


If Suzy's phone was cut, and Gloria had already left, why didn't she even attempt to go to Gloria's apartment/the rest of the house to see if she could use their phone? I imagine that if one phone is cut, the rest in the house are in working order and I can assume that Gloria's parents are out, but you would think a woman in such hysterics would think to go upstairs and at least try to open the door, if there even is one being a basement apartment after all.

Just a thought. I know I will get flak for this, but it really bothers me.

reply

this is just my opinion, the apartments were side by side outside, so Suzy went to Gloria's apartment to use her phone and to hide, she would be seen by three men, maybe they would try to hurt Gloria too.

Gloria's parents, her mother was out partying and her father had left them for legal separation.

reply

You bring up a good point, but she did break the hallway light first which is right in front of the door. If anything, they would have noticed that. And if they didn't notice, for some odd reason, the light is still out giving her a chance to go to Gloria's unseen.

reply

Well, panic makes you do funny things. But I think probably is that she knows no one is home - Gloria's mother and Shatner (the other neighbor) are both gone for the weekend, and she herself has sent Gloria away. If it were me, I'd automatically assume doors were locked. I'd probably try the other apartments only if I had run out of options in my immediate vicinity.

But, hey - movies all need suspension of belief, don't they?

reply

I wondered the same thing -- and as much as Gloria was popping in and out I suspect the door wouldn't have been locked, any more than Suzy's was.

She could also possibly have escaped out of their windows, since it would be on the first floor and liable to have windows not facing the street.

Even if she could have just gotten inside, locked the door and called the police, it's not likely the hoods could have stopped her in time, and then they'd be hightailing it out of there before the cops arrived.

reply

I was really hopimg that you would touch upon the thing that actually bothers me about this movie.....
It's the end.... I can understand Sam wanting Suzie to do things for herself. My big problem is at the end when she has been through so much......
Give me a break! If this man really loves this woman, WHY is this man just standing there and demanding that she comes to him?????
We get that he wanted her to do things his way. We get that he wanted her to be self sufficient. We got that.....
She has been through so much and he has to know that when there are dead bodies and she is hiding and crying behind a fridge door!
GO TO HER!!!!!
She has been through enough.

Fasten your seatbelts.... It's going to be a bumpy night!

reply

All of these questions are great. The main problem with all of these questions is that they question the movie. The movie was a script that deviated from the play.
The play is one of the most AMAZING scripts ever written.

Frederick Knott was an amazing playwright. Purchase a copy, rent a copy, somehow get a copy and read it. All of your questions will be answered.

He wraps up things nicely.

Oh, at the end of the film, Sam knows Susy well enough to know that she would prefer to walk to him on her own. This shows that Susy is an independent woman.
That is what I get from the ending of the play as well...

reply

What I thought was insane was Suzy sending a 12 year old girl out on the streets of New York at night to find her husband! I guess she didn't have anyone else to help.. but I thought it was crazy + the little girl having to pass the criminal men on the street.


“Marriage is wild. After you say you do, you don't for a long time."
~John Leguizamo~


reply

audrey was a courier during the war at age 12 and hid notes in her shoes and walked passed Nazi's daily to help the underground. So maybe that part of the movie isn't so far fetched. Don't forget that his was 1967 when grown ups actually thought kids could handle crossing the street alone at age 12.

reply