One of the good things about this movie is that it departs from the typical Hollywood happy ending. There is no implication of happy ending at any moment. The tone of the movie is set through flashbacks to show the troublesome relation within their marriage. And if you notice, the more time it passed, the more stormy the relationship grew. The message was that no marriage is a bed of roses, and it definitely departed from the expected violins musique de fond, and live happily ever after code.
I would consider this ending as a good example of what is known as "finis ouvert", better known in literary terms as open ending. It was somewhat surprising during the mid sixties to encounter this type of movie, not quite a comedy, by no means a drama, but something that put audiences, especially married people, to think and reflect.
This is what I thought when I first saw in my early twenties. I was a newlywed and I cried a lot at the end, because it was sad, but there was still love between them. When I saw the "The end" sign I thought that sooner or later they would break up. I saw the film again last week, and I still feel the same way about the ending. However, I still think it is a wonderful movie, worth seeing. Those years of their lives were a good experience to live, and the idea was to show how much fun and good memories human beings are able to cherish, no matter the obscure moments. But life changes, everything changes.
reply
share