alternate ending?


I usually have a good memory for these things, but this one has me baffled. I have seen this movie twice (once in about 1998 and once in 2004). I coould have sworn that in 1998, Eastwood's rival guys were all Hanged and that was the ending - ya know...Hang Em High... Now recently, when I was watching it, that never happened and I was very confused. I mentioned it and my dad said he also thought that they were hanged at the end. Did we get this confused with another movie or something or is there like...an alternate ending for the one that is broadcast on network television?

~faith in chaos~

reply

No, there was no alternate ending...The rivals were hanged about midway through the movie....The ending was Clint Eastwood finally catching the last of the men who hanged him, all except one -- who had hanged himself.

reply

I've quite literally just finished watching it, and I can tell you that he didn't catch all the gang. At least two of them are on the run and the movie ends with Clint setting off after them.

"Bangkok, Taiwan, Tokyo. Hey, what's the difference? I'm kickin' ass wherever I go!"

reply

Wait I thought he told the judge to release the old man in jail for he was not to blame for his hanging. The judge accepted only if Clint would pick up his badge and continue being a law man... He was actually setting out to get other criminals all of the bad guys (that hung him) were in jail or dead...

reply

no - charlie blackfoot was still "at large". the judge presents his warrant to cooper at the end.

reply

Time out he was killed wasnt he... A movie with an ending like that would be dumb... If he was at large the reason the movie was made would never be accomplished thus for you blame bad writing...

reply

Go back and watch the movie closely, and let me know if I'm wrong. I am 99% certain that:

1. When the captain tries to rally the hanging party to go after Cooper, Blackfoot says: No, I'm leaving, Cooper will have to hunt me down if he wants me (paraphrased).

2. At the final scene the Judge hands Cooper some warrants. He also says that one of the warrants is for Blackfoot.

Hence, at the end of the movie Blackfoot has not been captured/killed. And I don't see why you think this makes the ending of the movie "dumb" or goes against "the reason the movie was made".

reply

hmmm...nuff said nuff said I bow to you, you are the victor...

I watched it at night and was tired so I may have missed a few parts... But I remember the end when Clint says so and so in jail is sick... The judge says well Ill get a doctor... Clint says no just let him go but the judge says okay only if you pick up that badge and become a deputy again he picks it up and the judge gives him a parden note for the man in jail...

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

At the end, two of the fugitives who tried to lynch Cooper are still at large, Charlie Blackfoot and Maddow. Old Man Jenkins is pardoned by the judge at Cooper's request. So three are still alive. Cooper is handed two warrants, one for Blackfoot and one for Maddow. He rides out of town to round them up.

Kenneth Rorie

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

i don't know if the film goes so far as to say that the death penalty isn't right, just that people should trust the law and the law should be fairer and more just than people taking the law into their own hands.


The point of the film is also to show the hypocrisy and complexity of "civic law" or "civic justice" as opposed to the vigilante variety, because as Jed learns and protests against, Judge Fenton is often just as cruel, capricious, and wanton as the vigilantes. People should turn to civic law rather than vigilantism, but as Hang 'em High reveals (and here's what renders the film intelligent and subversive), civic law cannot be fully trusted, either, since it's often a product of prejudices and ulterior motives (such as dictatorial egotism, abuse of authority, public spectacle and consumption, justification of bravery and heroism, and political agendas such as proving that Oklahoma Territory is ready for statehood). As a result, capital punishment sometimes becomes just as egregious when it's presided over by a judge in black robes standing under the American flag than when it's conducted by some dusty cowboys in the middle of nowhere. To Jed's chagrin, increased civility does not necessarily result in better justice, and at times the results are just as gruesome, savage, and unfair, amounting to a lynching either way. In Hang 'em High's unswerving perspective, a lynching can occur within the legal justice system, too.

Hang 'em High could have just been a simplistic revenge Western, or it could have maintained a simple faith in the progress of civilization and the infallibility of civilized law. Instead, the motive of revenge and the genre's customary faith in civic law are thoroughly questioned, evaluated, and inverted, to the point where Hang 'em High (while flawed and lacking the visual naturalism of the Leone movies and Eastwood's future Westerns) becomes a challenging, compelling oater. It partook of one of Eastwood's favorite films growing up (1943's The Ox-Bow Incident, a dark, gloomy, claustrophobic Western directed by William Wellman and starring Henry Fonda), and it foreshadowed Eastwood's modern-day exploration of the fallibility of capital punishment, True Crime (Eastwood, 1999).

reply

i saw this movie four times when it came out,and i brought it recently.The indian charlie blackfoot,and the other ole man were not caught and the end.We see eastwood riding out of town pursuing them at the end.

reply

interesting...


Where there's smoke, there's barbecue!

reply