MovieChat Forums > Doctor Dolittle (1967) Discussion > The remake is much much better

The remake is much much better


Eddie Murphy not only is The nutty Professor, but he's also Dr. Dolittle!

reply

no, he is Eddie Murphy, and not a great Doctor Dolittle, Rex Harrison is much better.

Though it does depend on the type of films you like , I suppose.
Rex Harrison's Dr D, is more musical.
Eddie Murphy's more modern.



NEMO NISI INSANUS LABORAT!!!!

reply

[deleted]

Look---The Rex Harrison version was based on the original Dr. Dolittle novels. The Eddie Murphy version was based on Eddie Murphy, his ego, his stardom, and his $20 million payday.

reply

Ha, exactly.

reply

I did like the Eddie Murphy version, but Rex Harrison is the REAL Doctor. I totally believed he talked to the animals (ooh, that's almost a line from a song!)

reply

Rex Harrison Rules!

reply

No one can replace Rex Harrison.

*throws death glares at any who disagree*

reply

Or Samantha Eggar. Or Anthony Newley. I refuse to even watch the Eddie Murphy "remake".

reply

I once tried (1st part), threw up and switched off after bout 10 minutes. From what I saw this film is an eddie murphy template cast as any other and has nothing to do with 'Dr. Dolittle'. The title appearently only chosen for marketing considerations.

reply

Amen, Costa Brava. Aside from a vet who talks to the animals, there was nothing in common. Which seems to be the general practice in Hollywood these days. Then you have a whole generation growing up thinking stars like Eddie Murphy are the real thing (the REAL Dr. Dolittle). Ugghh. Eddie Murphy and that story couldn't be further from Dr. Dolittle if they'd tried. I have yet to see a single one of those movies. The trailers were enough (of a turnoff) for me. Wait, I did see last 20 mins of one. Bearable, but NOT Dr. Dolittle.

The problem is that the younger generation has to have everything handed to them. They can't use their imaginations for a minute. Everything has to be perfectly CG'd. There can't be any seams or zippers showing. Nothing as flagrantly fake as stop motion or men in Pushme Pullyou suits. Sad. Movies are nothing more than modern story telling. When you read a story, or someone tells you a story, you get to make all the pictures up in your head. Watching a perfectly computer animated movie may be pretty, but it leaves NOTHING to the imagination. Everything doesn't have to be perfectly polished, politically correct, and shot in "bullet-time" to be worth watching.

reply

[deleted]

What did it for you, the way he kept saying "you don't say?" and "aha" to the crocodiles and Turtles? Not everything was better in the old days...

No, Eddie Murphy is 50 times better than Rex Harrington, and the plot of the -98 movie is 10 times better than the -67 film.

Light travels faster than sound,
that's why people seem bright,
until you hear them.

reply

You can not compare the two movies. Rex Harrison is by far a much better actor and a great singer. Eddie Murphy is...Eddie Murphy (And yes, I do remember Mr. Murphy's album). It is a shame that the kids of today only know Eddie Murphy's Dr. Dolittle. The original was so much more interesting and unique. The whole "Push Me Pull You" idea was wonderful. The talking Guinea Pig thing was kind of "wake me when it is done". In my eyes, in reference to the Rex Harrison classic, "I've never seen anything like it in my life"... and I love it.

reply

Yeah right. The 1998 remake is the best!!!

reply

I'm sorry to have to say it, but anyone who thinks the Eddie Murphy version is in the same league as the original film has atrocious taste.

reply

I just finished watching the Rex Harrison version of "Doctor Dolittle", and I thought he did a marvelous job. I am going to rent the remake! It was such a fun movie that I vaguely remembered from childhood. I am a big fan of Eddie Murphy, and am interested in his take on it. How similar is it? Who plays the Anthony Newley role and the Samantha Eggar roles?

"I love corn!"

reply

It's an entirely different story. Don't look for any hint of similarity because there's none.

reply

eddie murphy has no talent period. he just plays eddie murphy or a fast talking black man. simple as that, every character the same...

reply

The remake of Dr DoLittle is a travesty as are most remakes on previously well-done movies. The original has wonderful actors, great music and follows the book fairly closely. Although the remake takes place in San Francisco which is a beautiful city I think St. Lucia beats it with its scenery and lush foliage.

reply

I couldn't agree more Amazon. I have no idea why Hollywood does these remakes that are never as good as the originals anyway. As for Rex Harrison, I still consider him the kindly Dr. Dolittle. Eddie Murphy was not a good choice to be Dr. Dolittle if they had to do a remake. In fact I've never understood Murphy's popularity. He's just not funny and comes across as a jerk with a chip on his shoulder. Hollywood wonders why they're drowning in a sea of red ink in recent years and this is just another example.

reply

I don't particularly care for Eddie Murphy and refuse to see the remake. I would imagine it is a gross imitation.

Besides, who can match the brilliant talent of Anthony Newley and Samantha Eggar?

Even the animals are more talented (trained such as they were) than many actors.

reply

Eddie Murphy not only is The nutty Professor, but he's also Dr. Dolittle!

Not only is the remake not ' MUCH MUCH' better, its not better at all.
You must score 'MUCH MUCH BETTER' weed than me ;)


"Pffft, my suspension of disbelief has higher standards than that"

reply

And, both of those renditions are absolutely repulsive and nasty! Shame on him for defiling those characters with his so-called brand of comedy! I have one final word: YUCK!


I'll stick with Jerry Lewis and Rex Harrison in their respective roles! Both are among my absolute favorite films. Admittedly, I have a long list of favorites, but I'm 60+ years old and do not remember when I wasn't crazy about movies. I'm watching and taping "Dr. Dolittle" (the ONLY worthwhile one) on TCM, and it's widescreen=} I hope TCM will never degrade itself with Murphy's putrid films.

I remember my sister and I watching this in the theater, and I have wonderful memories of that. Both of us loved it so much. When I bought the album, we listened to it nearly every morning as we got ready for school. We were about 16 and 14 then. I still can sing along to every song.



*** The trouble with reality is there is no background music. ***

reply

It was not a remake. It was a reimagining.

"I say,open this door at once! We're British !"

reply

[deleted]