MovieChat Forums > Bonnie and Clyde (1967) Discussion > Why was it necessary for the cop/ranger....

Why was it necessary for the cop/ranger...


to manipulate Blanche into revealing C.W. Moss' name? Why didn't he just continue with his "they lead Buck astray" angle and ask her point blank who their accomplice is?



"I told you a million times not to talk to me when I'm doing my lashes"!

reply

See the trivia section about this. The movie's version was false.

reply

Interesting question, karmala.

I'm wondering if it might have been to show Hamer (the Ranger) as a devious character who didn't play straight. It gives us a kind of insight into his way of doing things, and the next time we see him is when he kills Bonnie and Clyde through trickery and something equivalent to shooting them in the back.

Hamer's actions weren't within the law, and he kills them (in the movie version) more for personal revenge than anything else. He was even outside his legal jurisdiction. So I personally felt the way he treats Blanche sets us up for knowing what to expect from him later.


You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment.

reply

Yeah, nothing good.

reply

This film's portrayal of Frank Hamer is completely off the mark. This film trashes a legendary lawman to gin up sympathy for the title couple, who in real life were not particularly sympathetic figures.

"It ain't dying I'm talking about, it's LIVING!"
Captain Augustus McCrae

reply

This film's portrayal of Frank Hamer is completely off the mark. This film trashes a legendary lawman to gin up sympathy for the title couple, who in real life were not particularly sympathetic figures.

As the old saying goes: history is written by the victors. How do we know the real Frank Hamer wasn't a sadistic old bastard?

reply

Because he had a 30+ year record of effective and even-handed law enforcement. He didn't seek out the job of hunting Bonnie & Clyde, He was sought out by a multi-state commission and asked to lead the task force, purely because of his sterling reputation as a lawman. The character in the film is shown as a complete A-hole to gin up sympathy for the outlaw couple, who richly deserved the fate they got. They killed at least 9 lawmen during their rampage, don't forget. Hamer wasn't about to allow any more cops to die at their bloody hands.

"It ain't dying I'm talking about, it's LIVING!"
Captain Augustus McCrae

reply

Interesting question, karmala.

I'm wondering if it might have been to show Hamer (the Ranger) as a devious character who didn't play straight. It gives us a kind of insight into his way of doing things, and the next time we see him is when he kills Bonnie and Clyde through trickery and something equivalent to shooting them in the back.

Hamer's actions weren't within the law, and he kills them (in the movie version) more for personal revenge than anything else. He was even outside his legal jurisdiction. So I personally felt the way he treats Blanche sets us up for knowing what to expect from him later.


I definitely agree with you.

"I am the ultimate badass, you do not wanna `*beep*` wit me!"- Hudson in Aliens.

reply

They were killed in cold blood - in the movie version AND reality! Hamer wasn't going to take a chance on them escaping once again.

reply