After reading the 4 pages of comments, there were a few that mentioned an HBO version, there should be a remake, and that Sean Connery should play the Victor Velasco role. Below is the original cast. Who would you cast?
Robert Redford .... Paul Bratter Jane Fonda .... Corie Bratter Charles Boyer .... Victor Velasco Mildred Natwick .... Mrs. Ethel Banks, Corie's mother Herb Edelman .... Harry Pepper, Telephone man Mabel Albertson .... Aunt Harriet Fritz Feld .... Restaurant Owner James Stone .... Delivery Man Ted Hartley .... Frank Paul E. Burns .... Bum in Park rest of cast listed alphabetically Billie Bird .... Drunken neighbor (uncredited) Doris Roberts .... Hotel Maid (uncredited)
Autumn Reeser (Taylor in the O.C, she'd be perfect to play Corie!) Jesse Spencer - Paul Bratter Julie Andrews- Ethel Banks Gene Hackman - Victor Velasco
But I'd much prefer the old version because I got to see the gorgeous RR!!
Colin Firth for Paul Bratter. Rene Zellweger for Corie Bratter Sean Connery or Ricardo Montalban for Victor Velasco. Julie Christie for Corie´s Mother
Who cares? Many of us do. Some of us still respect film as an ART form. Not just a big industry that generates huge profits for the filmmakers, actors, and theater owners. I have no problem with a remake bringing new life into an aging story, especially if it was a lackluster production to begin with, but still respect the original. Lots of remakes are in the works now, of classic childhood favorites of mine: Chitty Chitty Bang Bang and Willy Wonka's Chocolate Factory. I will enjoy seeing the new version and see what they did with these classics.
As for the "age thing", maybe if you cared more about casting beling believable, you'd care more about the movies. I agree that some(many?) productions are just done to make a buck, but just as many, if not more, are done for the art, expression, and joy as well. Just listen to the commentary on a few great movies and you'll see what I mean.
In the meantime, I would rather not see Patricia Heaton, much as I think she's a great actress, portray the mother of Scarlett Johansen, much as I think SHE'S a great actress. Her big sister, maybe, but not mom. I could see Florience Henderson, or Goldie Hawn (oh yeah!), or someone that SEEMED like her mother, in age, appearance, and character. THAT'S what casting is about, along with their abilities, of course.
How about a modern twist on the idea of a remake - Why not let the leads still be played by Redford and Fonda. They could be older newlyweds. Have you ever thought about how difficult it must be when older folks get married for the first time?
That's so funny! I was thinking of Goldie and Kate...I didn't think of Kurt, but he'd be great...I'm still at a loss for who would be good as Paul....hmmm, maybe John Cusack...he's always worked up about something.
I have a problem with your choices for Corie's mother...Vanessa Redgrave would never agree to appear in a remake of BAREFOOT IN THE PARK...I would bet my next paycheck on that. Second, Olivia Hussey cannot act. Never could. Did you not see 1968's ROMEO AND JULIET or the 1973 musical remake of LOST HORIZON? She could not act then and I doubt if she's improved with age. The role of Ethel requires an actress with sharp comic timing.
The couple can play 'older newliweds' in a remake (the original was way back in early 30s) of Noel Coward's 'Private Lives'.
For those who haven't read the book, it's about a couple who get divorced and remarry - and are both honeymooning in the same hotel with their respective new spouses...and then of course the predictable happens.
If I remember, the opening dialogue in the play was something like:
ex-husband: what are YOU doing here? ex-wife: well, I'm honeymooning ex-husband: what a co-incidence, so am I
The new age audience can then enjoy a stand alone good comedy, those who have seen 'Barefoot...' can look at it as a kind of 'sequel', and those who have seen/read both and enjoy it from a different perspective.
Who do you think should direct this film?
{waiting for some Hollywood studio bigwig to read this post and filch it or, better still, send me a cheque!)
Here's a link to the NY Times on-line where readers are posting their own reviews of "Barefoot in the Park." If it asks you for a registration to view it, go ahead--it's free!