You seem to give the 'studios' a LOT of credit to be able to distinguish between low sales due to a boycott, and low sales due to lack of interest or an unpopular film...
Clue:
The finance people don't care why the investors do not get a better profit than they do/did, they just move on to the next project.
If there is ANY chance of a boycott making a difference...
Well, let me just say letters (signed!) should have been written to the studio(s) long before even the announcement of a DVD release. That should also have included requests that the DVD release be in the original format (widescreen!), and NOT CUT, with the full music, and special features, not limited to theatrical trailers, 'making of' featurette, and interviews with the cast and director. Merely saying you want a DVD release is probably not really what you want.
Be careful what you ask for, you just might get it... (and aparently, "we" have)
There are some very 'clueless' (or unscrupulous) people in the world, and two older film releases on DVD come to mind, regarding re-releases.
CONVOY
A film that may have ignited the popular CB radio craze among the public, or was made in reaction to the craze. A related film would be SMOKEY AND THE BANDIT. As of this writing, there has now been a second re-release of the movie. The first (re-)release on DVD had the unfortunate idea to horizontally squeeze the frames, and it just plain looks weird!! That could be from ignorance about how film/prints/negatives and theater projectors work though.
An acquaintance worked for years as the projectionist at a small multi-screen movie theater. He once mentioned there were 19 different projector lense sets for the various film formats, so the projected image looked right. That may have explained why the first DVD (re-)release was compressed left-to-right, because the projector lenses would have optically widened the picture for the screen, and the people doing the film-to-DVD conversion were not aware of all that. Or, they may have thought the flat-screen TVs could use the different modes to widen the image, but not all flatscreens can do that, and fewer of the newer ones can. Of course the original release to home entertainment was a pan-and-scan VHS version...
COLOSSUS; THE FORBIN PROJECT
Of the early movies that had a computer system become self-aware, this was one of the earlier movies, based from a book. It had a few twists that are still unique though. As the story goes, COLOSSUS was created to control the USA ICBMs and interceptor missiles (similar to the computer in the movie WARGAMES, but more sophisticated, self-repairing, and tamper-proof). Shortly after the system is activated, it deduces the Soviet Union has built a similar system, (Guardian?) and demands to be connected to it, in order to determine its 'intentions', or else "action will be taken". (Similar concept to the current TV series PERSON OF INTEREST with the two AI systems controlled by two different groups, with different intentions.)
Naturally, there is another 'wrinkle', and it seems the two systems were programmed somewhat ambiguously "to protect humans". (Think of the movie/book 2001 with the HAL computer programmed to carry out the mission, and calculating the humans on board the spaceship pose a risk to completing its mission, and takes steps to eliminate them.)
The book was written before the term "techno-thriller" described such books and movies, and it got a little lost when it was grouped with sci-fi/horror.
The movie was filmed in widescreen, (1.85:1 as I remember), and a double feature laserdisc is the only version of home entertainment media in widescreen. Both the VHS and a much later DVD release were done in 1.33:1 pan-and-scan. The first few days of the DVD release sold well, before the fans realized it was only the full frame format, and sales correspondingly plummeted. There has been no mention of a widescreen re-release of that film, presumably due to the poor sales of the original DVD.
I did have a copy of that laserdisc set, and it sold on eBay for well over $100, plus shipping costs, so there is/was a market for the widescreen version. **sigh**
reply
share