MovieChat Forums > A Big Hand for the Little Lady (1966) Discussion > I'm going to make a 'cut' of this film r...

I'm going to make a 'cut' of this film removing the 'funny' ending.


(The spoiler tags are probably pointless, as I suspect everyone reading that has already seen the movie; but I'll include them nonetheless.)

Instead of the film revealing that the whole game was a confidence scam, it should have ended with Jason Robards' character;s advice to the kid (who then shinnies out the window and rides off, escaping a marriage-from-Hell). He was actually the wisest, most interesting character in the film at that point; and the film would have closed on a dramatic high note.

Instead it went with goofy fluff for cheap laughs at the end, and shamelessly rips off "The Sting". IMO, it's why the film has dwindled into obscurity.

reply


I suggest you look at when "A Big Hand..." and The Sting were written/produced and reverse your final sentence.


-Paul.

reply

1- This movie was made in 1966. The sting came out 5 to 10 years later. To "shamelessly rip off The Sing" they should have invented a time machine first.

2- Your edited ending, with all due respect, SUCKS!! So you would be satisfied with thinking that Fonda/Woodward just got lucky? What would be the point?!!! The whole point of the movie was that it was an elaborate con job.

reply

... and shamelessly rips off "The Sting".
Care to place a small wager on that?🐭

reply