I first saw this picture in 1965,when it first came out.Ther were several salient points that struck me:
1.)The kids are actually much more evil than the pirates are.After all,this is a gang of doorknobs who didn't have enough brains to come in out of the rain.
2.)I got the biggest kick out of Captain Chavez inhaling an entire spoonful of cayenne pepper at lunch,wihtout even batting an eye.If I tried that,I'd have smoke coming out of my ears,and flames issuing from my nostrils.
3.)I never particularly cared for James Coburn.He reminded me of somebody from high school who used to pick on me.(On the other hand,I shouldn't have gotten fresh with his sister,either.)
Thank you for your thoughtful and interesting message.I happen to agree;kids are born basically amoral,and are influenced by heredity,environment,and all sorts of other factors. I have worked in a variety of settings with many disturbed people,and have seen some very pathological types emerge from backgrounds that most folks would be happy to come from.Conversely,I have seen some very healthy people emerge from very deprived,dysfunctional backgrounds.It's really impossible to predict.As Yogi Berra said once"It ain't over until it's over!" By the way,Hans C. Frederick is the pen name that I use for writing reviews,and posting messages and commments of this type.It was the name of a mioniature dachshund that my family owned from 12/67-10/80/If you would be interested in starting a "pen pal" sort of relationship,I can forward you to me website.
I have a biography of Alexander Mackendrick called 'Lethal Innocence' - it was a recurring theme in his movies. In 'Sammy Going South' the child is also somewhat amoral, and causes the deathof one character. In 'the Ladykillers' the sweet old landlady also plays a part in the demise of the crooks.
The notion of children as innocent angels is fery misleading - lord of the Flies anyone? That's why they have to be guided and trained in acceptable behaviour - and why most judicial systems don't regard young children as being morally responsible for heinous crimes they may have committed, having not yet reached the age of moral judgement.
Of course what holds the movie together is the ambiquous relationship between Chavez (Anthony Quinn) and Emily (Deborah Baxter). The musical score and their eye contact when Chavez first climbs aboard (after the violent clunk of the grappling hook) emphasizes some sort of immediate emotional understanding between them. Zac (James Coburn) realizes this -- he's not sure what it is, but is aware it could be dangerous. I believe the actors and director manage this perfectly. James Coburn provides just the right amount of relief from a situation that could become too intense, and Emily herself is unsure what it's really about but also understands its potential danger. This is shown when Chavez and Emily wrestle on the deck (this was too much for one audience in a theatre in which I saw the movie in 1966 -- they became very uncomfortable), and Emily then beats Chavez on the back, telling him that he is an evil pirate (after telling another of the children shortly beforehand that the crew are the 'pilot' and not 'pirates') and that he will go to hell. Chavez appears completely mortified. To me, Quinn plays Chavez as a pirate going through a 'mid-life crisis'. Perhaps he is realizing the anguished loss of not having a family and children, and of having lived the life of a pirate who stays at bordellos between succesful raids and now has nothing much to look forward to. Now he has something like a 'substitute family' to whom he can display his long-buried tender feelings and the children respond with affection for him. Zac realizes that it has become more important to Chavez to provide proper care for the injured Emily than to risk her missing this because of an attack on an apparently rich Dutch Trader. The crew then mutiny. Emily has adopted views of how a pirate should behave when she tells Chavez that he should be attacking the other ship with the crew because, "You're the Captain!" Of course, later at the trial, Emily knows she killed the Dutch Captain, but sacrifices Chavez rather than admit her guilt. Chavez understands and more or less indicates to her not to feel badly about what she is doing -- he is no longer very interested in living anyway. It is this portrayal of Chavez that distinguishes him from the equivalent character (Jonson) in the book, and makes the Quinn character so much more sympathetic. I think it shows Quinn's greatness as an actor that he is able to bring this off, and the amazing ability of the young Deborah Baxter who is able to counter-play the delicate balance in their relationship.
I agree that Davidn48 did a wonderful analysis of the film's themes and meaning. That was just how I saw it also. I feel that the children are amoral, certainly, if not precisely evil. The mother had recognized this in her decision to send them back to England, for a "proper" education and instruction. I have to admit I was not as enamored of Deborah Baxter's performance as Emily as some others, finding her sometimes quite irritating (especially at the beginning, with her mother annoying as well). She did nail the pivotal scene with the Dutch captain, though, and who knows, maybe I was missing the whole point of the character. All in all, a case where I'm sure the book that I haven't read was better!
- Early in the movie, she was constantly associated with scenes of violence and death: The natives tearing the chicken apart. Discovering the dead servant. The monkey getting killed in front of her. The captain of the ship being tortured.
- She was right at home, very comfortable and at ease in the company of pirates and rough men. Especially, of course, Chavez.
- The relationship between her and Chavez was as close to a romantic one as a ten year old and a forty year old can get. And that doesn't mean he was a pedophile. He never would have laid a hand on her except to help her. I'm convinced she and Chavez were kindred spirits, and if she were ten years older, they would have been lovers.
- One theme of this movie is the amorality of children, but it was also about the shaping of Emily. She was in her element in the world of the Pirates and the Islands and the sea. When she grew up, I could see her becoming an explorer.
i don't think there are any villains. the pirates treat he children quite decently, and the children are not responsible for what happens, they are too young.