The Curing of Aram, the Blind Man


I've often wondered if the original longer 240 minute cut sheds any additional light on when Ed Wynn's character, Aram, actually has his blindness miraculously cured. In the present DVD cut, we have the scene in Nazareth by the well with Wynn talking to Von Sydow's Jesus, though as the camera pulls back, the viewer realized Von Sydow is no longer there, even though Wynn keeps talking as if he's there (even commenting how tall Jesus has become). I've always supposed this scene to be a visual analogy to the saying "a prophet is never accepted in his home," that is to say that Wynn's Aram cannot get past seeing Jesus as only the son of Joseph the carpenter, and not as the messiah. He sees without "seeing." We next see Aram at the raising of Lazarus scene, and given the double-take that David McCallum's Judas gives Wynn (I've always admired Stevens' framing of the scene, in that McCallum always has his back to the miracle and thus never "witnesses" it), I wonder if we are to surmise that this is the moment Aram regains his sight. If so, it kind of nicely complements the earlier well scene, in that Aram only finally gets his cure when he "sees" Jesus as the Messiah, and not merely as the man whom he once knew as a child.

Does anyone familiar with the original longer cut know if that version further clarifies this storyline?

reply

No, I think the curing of Aram is simply a quiet understated moment for a quiet, understated character, perhaps gradually happening after the scene is over. Ed Wynn's comedic abilities always hid a more subtle serious side. No doubt George Stevens found this out during the filming of ANNE FRANK. The moment is better left momentarily unresolved. Shelly Winters' scene proves that. Anything more direct would have undercut his later "all I know..." scene during the night trial.

reply

The longer cut shown in 1964 (though only 3 hrs 44 m) did not clarify this dilemma.

I agree with both posters -

The unresolved moment of the miracle works best for Aram's cure.

I love this movie, btw.

reply

I think Aram is a composite of the blind man who during the "trial" of Jesus said, "I was blind before and now I see". In Jesus of Nazareth, Jesus (Robert Powell) seemed to "make" and eye for a blind man out of mud. Afterward the man said the same thing (i.e. "I was blind before and now I see"). Again, I think we are dealing with a composite character that attempts to help tell the story without unnecessarily compromising the biblical text too much.

reply

The blind man Jesus cured was in fact names Bartimaeus.

reply