During Col Kiley's visit to the "up front" front, there is a scene where a man in a bunk is reading a magazine. The magazine is folded to an inner page and the movie viewer can see the page not being read by the soldier. I maintain that is a Playboy magazine - specifically May 1964. The magazine is opened to the Playmate of the Year pictorial of Donna Michelle. The page in view of the audience actually has her nude. Check it out and freeze the frame! You will see the magazine, the page has her in tropical lagoon someplace. I await your comments.
Yes, I noticed that even without pausing the movie. This is a big goof in the film, considering "Playboy" didn't even come out until after the war! I wonder what thoughts were going through his head during then...
I have no doubt you are correct wally, without even having to look. There are so many disappointing, sloppy anachronisms in this appallingly bad war film that a small detail like the Playboy pales in comparison to the rest of the embarrassing howlers that caused World War II vets of the real battle of the Ardennes to get up and head for the exits before the third reel.
My father was thrown into action with an airborne division that came up to break the siege of Bastogne. He participated in over 30 days of combat that followed as the 3rd Army chased the Germans back to Germany. To him, this movie must have been made as a burlesque, a farce. Because it certainly was absolutely nothing at all like what he experienced.
I've walked the woods and fields around Bastogne and I've seen the remains of battle, still evident after six decades. The Spanish plains is so different from Belgium that they might as well have saved even more money and shot the flick in Mexico, on a beach. It's nothing like the rolling fields and thick pine woods of the Ardennes. The film makers spent all their money on casting big name movie stars and scrimped on almost everything else.
Rather than a tribute, this film was an insult to the men who fought and died in Belgium.
Oh well, at least they got the locations correct, even if the shooting sites were clearly not in the Ardennes. Still, you gotta hand it to the great preformances throughout this picture not to mention the terrific musical score and special effects. Now if only they could've gotten the historical accuracy nailed down. Then this would've been a great historical war drama.
I agree it is a minor fault compared to some things wrong with this movie. The final battle being fought in a tree less landscape. The movie does not tell the whole story of the battle. It would be a good movie to remake.