I love hamburgers as much as the next guy, but he's wrong... there is indeed blood shown, albeit not in major quantity. Trust me, I have it on Blu-Ray and watched it tonight on my Samsung 67" LED DLP (amazing picture quality) and you can clearly see blood in quite a few scenes. There's blood in the snow at the massacre, blood on soldiers throughout, on walls of tanks that were hit. However, it is so subdued and essentially the exact opposite of how blood was used in film with "Kill Bill" or other excessively bloody movies.
The Blu-Ray release of this movie is bi far so heads and shoulders above the DVD release... with the new footage (exclusive to BD) added in seamlessly and the purity of the original film captured intact as if made yesterday. I paid only eleven bucks for it new on Amazon, even though I already own the LD and DVD versions... and it was as if I'd never seen it before. I know it's historically inaccurate and the effects are not like today, but I still enjoy this as one of my war faves... and I have a lot of war films. If rated bi today's MPAA standards, the 'violent' content in this film would make it no worse than a PG, certainly not PG-13. I've seen this several times and would recommend it to anyone who likes 'epic' war films as this was. Even though synthesized in story, it carried over the feel of the battle and the men behind it quite well. It certainly is not as 'bad' as many here have made it out to be and seeing it in large widescreen HD gives this film a new life and a completely different feel.
Ted in Gilbert, AZ
reply
share