MovieChat Forums > Seance on a Wet Afternoon (1964) Discussion > What would have ultimately happened to M...

What would have ultimately happened to Myra Savage in 1964?


My guess is that she would just have been shoved in an asylum somewhere. I don't think post-natal depression was much recognised in those days (especially worse after a still-born baby) - I can just imagine her being pushed out of hospital by a starchy nurse saying, "You'll get over it, dear". She would have received special treatment these days, I'm sure. Looking at the film from this point of view, the plot is quite tragic - audiences in those days would have just seen a looney, whereas modern audiences would see an extremely sick woman, desperately in need of help. The husband was too weak to do anything, but one would have thought that a doctor would have followed up the stillbirth, to check on the mother?

reply

Too often people fall into thinking that people of their own time are so modern and understand everything, while previous generations do not. I disagree - times may change but people do not. Audiences in the 1960s would have seen her as mentally unstable but also deeply hurt, not just loony. The more discerning audience then and now would also pick up subtext from Stanley's performance and from the lines of the film themselves. What is true today was true then.

reply

So what you're trying to say is that people in 1964 had no concept of post-stillbirth depression or mental anguish? That no one would have figured her strange behaviour may have something to do with this tragedy? You can't be serious...



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply