Marnie 's struggle reaching into the safe. Profound or too much?
I can't decide. Would that be a realistic reaction from a person, for it to be that overt? (and was the red-flashing happening then also)?
shareI can't decide. Would that be a realistic reaction from a person, for it to be that overt? (and was the red-flashing happening then also)?
shareThat's pretty much the worst scene in the film (alongside Hedren's falsetto babbling in the end). It's just ridiculous, how it's acted and filmed. Otherwise, my impression of the movie changed for the better quite a bit the last time around, but these few instances remain the unfortunate holdovers.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
I never knew if it was great or bad, one of those instances. In reality, would a person with her pathology really act that way. Since Hitch was an expert with detail and a great director, I am wondering what he was intending.
shareI don't think Hedren jerking her hand back and forth there was ever supposed to be "realistic", exactly, but doesn't even work as this sort of hyper styllized rendering of a thief in two minds about committing the crime. It just looks silly.
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan
Hitch was an expert with detail and a great director
'And Marnie reverting to "five year old child" and squealing "You let my mama go!" et cetera was equally bad, not to mention the sepia flashback. Poor Bruce Dern, what a godawful scene to start your career with.'
---------------------
I also can't tell if the baby=voice worked, or whether it worked with Hedren enacting it. I would like to think Hitch would had make a good objective judgement call on that one.
Actually Bruce Dern started his "bigger" career with "The Incredible Two-Headed Transpalnt in 72' with Pat Priest from The Munsters
I'm not sure if it is realistic or not. The film seems to purposely distort reality (the bad rear screen, the obvious sets and play like look).
Marnie is going through some very hard psychological blocks. She is no longer the thief she once was but her new status is still in limbo. The money represents both an easy steal (Mark) but it also represents herself. Mark is right, the money is partly her own. So she is fighting to be what she once was but also wanting to be someone normal.
It's similar to her baby-girl voice at the end. Was that believable or not (I suppose more from an acting stance) I can't decide
share