I agree that this movie is excellent, and it would probably be in my personal list of top ten movies.
But you are wasting your time.
The way the IMDB "weighted average" ratings work, a movie gets points not just for it's average rating, but for the total number of votes it gets.
A true median for this movie would be about 8.1 based on the votes which, by itself, would get it in the top 250 around the 100 mark. But the number of votes is too low.
Anyway to get the movie into the top 250 you would need a lot more votes. I don't know the exact formula they use, but you would need like 5-10,000 more votes. Just getting people who read this board to vote for it won't do it.
Personally I think the way the IMDB ratings work is kind of dumb, but I can see the point of it. Otherwise you would have movies that like three people ever vote on and they all give it a ten and it would be at the top of the ratings, although those three people might be idiots and it might be a stupid movie.
Obviously in most cases or in this case, it isn't that simple, there are quite a few votes for this movie, but that's the kind of thing they were avoiding, anyway.
So the top 250 is dominated by mass-appeal movies, rather than really artistically excellent movies.
reply
share