Use of colour
Can anyone suggest a site that discusses the use of colour in Le Mepris? If so I would be very grateful. Thanks.
shareCan anyone suggest a site that discusses the use of colour in Le Mepris? If so I would be very grateful. Thanks.
shareTry the external reviews. One of them has a few ideas about Vincente Minelli references, Palance and Bardot both wearing yellow bathrobes and the four main colours mirroring the four languages spoken in the film.
Of course the opening scene is shot in red, then white then blue which are the colours of the French flag, and as Kieslowski has more recently reminded us relate to liberty equality and fraterity - all of which are conspicuously absent from the remainder of the film...
I'm more interested in the use of wigs in Le Mepris. Godard casts Bardot, at that time the world's most famous blonde, and then dresses her up as his (brunette) wife Anna Karina? (and we might assume Piccoli as himself...).
Most of how Godard treated Bardot in the film was subversive to her image. She never had any sexy outfits, and the one nude shot was really obligatory more than anything. She actually behaves in a more-or-less prudish fashion.
I don't personally feel that Contempt was really an allegory for Godard's own life. The circumstances between Paul and Camille provided an oppurtunity to analyze I guess just the disintegration of a marriage. I see a lot of Antonioni in this film's handling of relationships at least.
I am probably regurgitating a lot of the essay that accompanied the Criterion disc. You can read it at the criterion website. It's pretty long, but I found it to be incredibly revealing.
D'oh. You don't count her swimming away from Piccoli at the Casa Malaparte as a nude shot? Of course you're right that Godard intentionally, aggressively subverted her sex-kitten image even as he profited from it. I hope she was grateful for being manipulated in a different way for a change. It must have been hard to go through a very public life as a cartoon of sexuality.
sharethe wig is very much meant to evoke his wife karina at the time. he is being very critical of his treatment towards her, he views himself as overly macho and unsympathetic.
from jonathan rosenbaum's 'chicago reader' review:
"1. Michelangelo Antonioni. Paul and Camille's exhaustive as well as exhausting scene in their significantly unfinished and mainly white-walled flat is in many ways the sequel to an almost equally protracted scene between Jean-Paul Belmondo and Jean Seberg in Breathless, though that was essentially a long seduction and this is a chronicle of growing disaffection. Unquestionably Antonioni, whom Godard interviewed at length in 1964, is the ruling influence on this scene--on its casual detachment from both characters, novelistic psychological ambiguities, protracted sense of duration, and remarkable feeling for the ebb and flow of a troubled relationship. Back in 1964, when I was blind to the Antonioni influence, I was turned off by Paul's macho insensitivity and what I perceived as Godard's uncritical identification with it; today I'm more inclined to read the same sequence as a profound self-critique.
Much as Antonioni was charting aspects of his relationship with Monica Vitti in all his films of this period (L'avventura, La notte, Eclipse, Red Desert), Godard was examining his relationship with Anna Karina in most of the films that immediately preceded and followed Contempt (Le petit soldat, A Woman Is a Woman, and Vivre sa vie beforehand, and Band of Outsiders, Alphaville, Pierrot le fou, and Made in U.S.A. afterward). In Contempt Godard has Bardot put on a Karina-like black wig at two separate points during the quarrel between Paul and Camille. (Antonioni has a similar wig-changing scene in L'avventura.) It's unfortunate that Kauffmann--who was one of Antonioni's earliest and most passionate American defenders--regarded Godard's masterful protracted sequence in Contempt as bankrupt. To me it's the emotional and thematic core of the film, in part because it registers with much of the same personal urgency as Antonioni's films with and about Vitti. (The same urgency, incidentally, can be found in Roberto Rossellini's films of the 50s with Ingrid Bergman, especially Viaggio in Italia.)"
can be viewed here:
http://www.chicagoreader.com/movies/archives/0997/09057.html
Imho, the colors represent the two ways of thinking, art vs money and also represents the different stages of the relationship. If you notice, during the Odyssey scene when Fritz Lang shows the clips from his film, Poseidon (Odysseus's enemy) has blue eyes while Minerva (Odysseus's ally) has red eyes.
In the 'nude' scene, the first frame is filtered with a red tint I believe, then goes to white, then to blue. The red represents the passion of their relationship and as the movie progresses, the relationship turns cold (blue).
When Ms. Vanini puts on a red shirt, you see Paul fall for her and attempt to flirt with her. He slaps her buttocks.
I could be completely wrong but red usually helps Paul (the red car kills Camille and Jack Palance by crashing).
During the last scene, Ms. Vanini walks right by Paul and completely cold shoulders him. She is wearing blue. This is different from the Francesca who was wearing red earlier. She won't even talk to him now.
There is also the fact of Godard's political beliefs to take into consideration. Palance character is usually wearing a blue suit and represents Pauls enemy, well, blue = capitalism while red = communism and who better to represent capitalism than the American producer who is trying to destroy the art of the film for commercial reasons.
Very intersting theory.
shareWow, thanks for spoiling the movie, *beep*
shareIn the 'nude' scene, the first frame is filtered with a red tint I believe, then goes to white, then to blue. The red represents the passion of their relationship and as the movie progresses, the relationship turns cold (blue).
When Ms. Vanini puts on a red shirt, you see Paul fall for her and attempt to flirt with her. He slaps her buttocks.
I could be completely wrong but red usually helps Paul (the red car kills Camille and Jack Palance by crashing
I think it's more that red is the centre of drama. When they are arguing in their apartment Camille is wearing a red towel and their sofa is also red, and of course the scenes you mentioned involving red are also dramatic. I think Camille wearing the yellow bath robe after Paul allows her to go with Jerry a second time marks her falling out of love with him completely, as yellow is nearer to blue, blue signifying complete indifference. Or perhaps it is because the female extras as well as the secretary also wear the yellow robe, so it could signify their separateness and death of intimacy.
Did you notice how the lighting switches from red to neutral in the nude scene immediately after Camille asks "do you prefer my breasts or nipples?" and Paul answers "I don't know"? His indecision resulting from the fact that he would rather avoid conflict than assert his will could be why he "isn't a man" in Camille's eyes.
the dvd has commentary which goes into the whole color thing. sometimes it seems to be used (like when the filter just turns totally blue or red) just to remind the viewer that they are watching a movie (besides the whole french flag thing). It's a total stylistic touch regardless of what it means, really great Godard.
share