MovieChat Forums > Irma la Douce (1963) Discussion > Wilder's Biggest Hit...And The Beginning...

Wilder's Biggest Hit...And The Beginning of the End


In 1960, Billy Wilder won Oscars for Best Director, Co-Writer, and Picture for "The Apartment." A presenter whispered in his ear, "Time to stop, Billy." The suggestion being: he'd peaked ("Some Like It Hot" was the year before), the sixties were here, younger directors were coming, he'd have nowhere to go but down.

But you don't stop when you're peaking. Wilder wanted to make as his next film "Irma La Douce," but learned he had to wait two years for travelling road productions of the stage musical to play out before he could release the movie.

So he made "One, Two, Three," (1961) without Lemmon or Curtis or Monroe or MacLaine...he had a great older James Cagney, but little else...and he flopped.

Worried he might be ("Time to stop, Billy"), but Wilder persevered. He made "Irma La Douce," re-teaming Lemmon and MacLaine from "The Apartment" (MacLaine got her rather-standard-to-be hooker role after Marilyn Monroe died and Liz Taylor dropped out.)

"Irma La Douce" became Billy Wilder's biggest hit. It is also nowhere near the achievement of "The Apartment" (a point made painfully clear with Lemmon and MacLaine reteamed.) Or "Some Like It Hot." Or "Sunset Boulevard." Or "Double Indemnity." And it signalled a new direction for the work of Billy Wilder: blatantly sexual, broad and crass, and rather dated even as it broke new sexual ground.

"Irma La Douce" was a big hit in 1963, I would opine, for a very simple reason: it was about hookers and johns and pimps and couples living together without benefit of clergy and sex, sex, sex. It was, in short, a dirty movie (without sex shown, nor any nudity save MacLaine's back.)

Might as well compare it to the biggest hit of Billy Wilder's peer, Alfred Hitchcock: Psycho of 1960. Hitchcock had scored big with a horror movie (drawing the drive-in crowds and teenagers "normal" Hollywood disdained.) Wilder now scored big with a "blue movie" (drawing salacious suburbanities to a MOVIE that Hollywood disdained. Producer Hal Wallis called it "pornograhy...filth.") Hitchcock and Wilder were "respected auteurs," but then and now: to make a hit, sometimes all you need to do is use sex and/or violence in big doses.

But "Psycho" was also a classic. "Irma La Douce" is not. Oh, its not terrible. Wilder's brash wit shines through here and there. MacLaine is a sexy number in her way, and Lemmon's elfin-loser schtick heads towards Chaplin-ville at times.

But there is a disconcerting broadness to "Irma La Douce", and an inability to plumb the realities of "The Apartment" (how could it? This is a musical with the SONGS REMOVED, in which people still move around in stylized motions like they are about to sing or dance.) The opening montage of scenes showing MacLaine, after sex with each john, telling some sob story that triggers additional payment is (a) incredibly frank for its time and (b) incredibly unfunny in the set-up of MacLaine's dumb stories and the dumber reactions of the men.

From what I gather, Billy Wilder knew that "Irma La Douce" was beneath his greatest works. But it was a big hit, and it made Wilder richer than ever, and he followed it up with an even "dirtier" (and better, IMHO) picture called "Kiss,Me Stupid" (1964) that was pretty much refused regular studio release, going out as an "art film blue movie."

As they would for Hitchcock and Hawks and others, the 60's caught up with Billy Wilder. "Irma La Douce" was a false alarm for Wilder. He wasn't going to rise higher than this hit; it was really a swan song. Attempts to recapture that "Apartment" magic with "Kiss Me Stupid" and the drab "Fortune Cookie" (Matthau: great; movie: not so great) led to what he called "my downfall."

Good news: from that later period came two movies that are better than "Irma La Douce": the lyrical and sad "Private Life of Sherlock Holmes" of 1970 and the brash and poignant sex comedy "Avanti" (complete, FINALLY, with some real sex and actual nudity, circa 1972, including Juliet Mill's fine chest and Jack Lemmon's fit middle-aged bottom.)

Wilder struggled his way on through the 70's to 1981. He needed old friends Lemmon and Matthau for two of his final three pictures ("The Front Page" and the awful and final "Buddy Buddy.") and old friend William Holden for the other ("Fedora," a weak sister to "Sunset Boulevard" of which Holden said, "I shouldn't have been in it to generate those memories OF "Sunset Boulevard".)

Still, rewind the projector to 1963 and it looks like the beginning of the end for the grand run of Billy Wilder's career was, ironically, his biggest hit: "Irma La Douce," a movie in which sex is moved so front and center (and so leeringly so), that it never has time to be truly erotic or enticing or entertaining.

Too bad. But Lemmon and MacLaine were as good as could be expected (and both joined Billy Wilder in making more in gross-percentages off of this "Hooker Hit" than from most of their other films.)

And there's something to be said for one of the first movies of the Hays Code that just came out and said it: people have sex. For money. Without marriage. All the time.

P.S. Billy Wilder loved black-and-white, and only grudgingly made this film in color. But it LOOKS like a black-and-white movie anyway. Faded, weird colors all around. Weird.

reply

I wonder how Schindler's List would've shaped up had Billy Wilder taken it up. Apparently he was the first choice of the producer.

Btw, Billy Wilder was first and foremost a great screenwriter. His filmography as a director is very impressive, but mainly because of the witty, trenchant screenplays.

I suppose with the onset of the sixties, films became more cinematic and less theatrical thus inhibiting filmmakers like Wilder whose films invariably sounded better than they looked.


Method Actors give you a photograph, Real actors an Oil Painting
Charles Laughton

reply

Wilder's screenwriting talent was certainly key to his success (and always, I believe, with a collaborator to handle American-English phrases that Wilder couldn't master, guys like Charles Brackett and I.A.L. Diamond.)

It may have contributed somewhat to his downfall, though, too.

Because Wilder pretty much had to stick to his own sense of writing style and humor, as the movies rapidly modernized in the 60's and 70's, Wilder could only do so much to "get hipper." He didn't, really. He probably didn't want to. Meanwhile, the new generation...and even an oldster like Hitchcock...were hiring new young writers to work on their films.

Wilder did have a penchant for topicality, though. I recall the private eye in "The Fortune Cookie" (1966), seeking to leave his shabby beat spying on Jack Lemmon, "because I need to get home and watch Batman." (The silly 1966 TV show.)

reply

The Apartment is by far the worst Wilder film I've seen. One, Two, Three and even Irma La Douce are much better films.

Nice historical context all the same, thanks for posting.




This story is already over

reply

The Apartment is by far the worst Wilder film I've seen.


Well, definitely to each is own there. The ending took a perfect movie and lowered it just a bit, but still one of my favorites.

There are a lot of people who think i'm a flake.
Who thinks that?
Me, for one.

reply

Maybe, let us not be so hard on Wilder here. All his counterparts ony had modest success after 1960 (Hawks, Hitch, Ford, and Huston spent most with really bewildering movies. Also his fifties movies after Paramount are good stuff but not classic.) That said most of sixties movies still have some sexual wit to them that was completely lost in film making after Wilder retired and are enjoyable to watch. Let us think of it as Leonard Maltin review of Topaz, "It is a good movie and there is nothing wrong with that."

Let switch our thinking to Some Like It Hot and The Apartment as something special to appreciate.

reply

The Apartment is by far the worst Wilder film I've seen.
by - timmy_501 on Fri Oct 17 2008 21:10:24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree. I hated The Apartment.

Psycho is a classic and Irma is forgotten because it's like all stagebound '60s movies. Stagey movies are "entertainment." They were meant to mimic a theatrical experience, not reality. And they are little concerned with advancing film. Thatricality was not the future. Nor were Nestors (Lemmon) uptight, Bourgie worries or the movies "dirty" zany antics.

Irma la Douce is exploring nothing that had potential for others to join in.
Psycho had compelling technique, aside from knocking down boundaries, and introduced complex if far-fetched psychology. Every crazed killer ever made since '61 is still in a dialogue with Psycho.

I enjoy One, Two, Three, but Wilder clearly falls on the side of the establishment in that one, in a time when youth issues and interests were beginning a long reign. Why would a twenty year old, with the '60s stretching out before him or her, like it?

reply

I just watched this the Apartment, Double Indemnity and Some Like it Hot for the first time this week (though I did see SLIH before) and this was the worst for me. I really enjoyed Lemon and MacLaine (suprisingly since I never cared for her in any of her mature roles, the few I've seen anyway) in the Apartment but in this, it's not that they were bad just that their characters were annoying. I found Lemon's Lord X grating after a while and the whole movie just dragged and dragged...and dragged it felt every bit as long as it's 149 minute running time, suprised it's regarded as it is but can see why it's the beginning of the end.

reply

Double Indemnity is probably my favorite, but One Two Three is right up there and certainly his most underrated film in my book. That movie travels at His Girl Friday speed and its a lot of fun the whole way through.

reply

The Apartment the worst Wilder film youve ever seen...? whaaa? The Apartment is a perfect film and Wilders best...or at least top 5 (sunset/double i/some like it all up there). Its a masterpeice! I have to be dreaming.\ ps Irma is also great, a tad too long but great cast and hilarious, i dont think it was the beginning of the end billy still had some great work ahead, fortune cookie/kiss me stupid (underrated) avanti

reply

So he made "One, Two, Three," (1961) without Lemmon or Curtis or Monroe or MacLaine...he had a great older James Cagney, but little else...and he flopped.

One, Two, Three is an excellent and underrated movie. One of Wilder's best.

reply