Putting aside the NF recommendation issue, the question whether admiration for other Antonioni films make an appreciation of L'Eclisse probable is just a bit problematic. My first Antonioni film was Blow-up. While i consider that a great film as well, it is also more accessible in several respects, beyond the obvious of it being in color and, for those in English speaking countries, no need to read subtitles. But despite Blow-up's complexity (and in particular its treatment of how we relate to perception), it is a rather straightforward film in its narrative arc.
The Passenger also has its twists and turns, but is also imo relatively straightforward (and again in color and English). Zabriskie Point does not follow a standard model, but imo is not really all that complex, either.
The earliest dated film of his I have seen is L'Avventura. First viewing left me astonished by the shifting protagonist turn, as well as the related huge turn in the film's focus. La Notte returned to a more conventional structure, but remains a stunningly complex rendering of how people in relationships search for meaning, in sex, love, avoidance of boredom?, with the underlying reality of existential anxiety always at risk of becoming predominate. Red Desert I find a frankly difficult film, and need to see again, but while the great art of it is in providing a cinematic vision of Giulianna's psychological challenges, and the landscape in which the film proceeds, it does not strike me as having the perfection that L'Eclisse has.
Perfection. But also a complexity that makes it frankly more of a challenge. To the relatively casual viewer, i can see someone admiring some of his other films more than L'Eclisse. But I also think L'Eclisse is the best.
reply
share