MovieChat Forums > To Kill a Mockingbird (1963) Discussion > Books like this kill interest in reading...

Books like this kill interest in reading in children and teens.


The love of a book and art is a subjective question without doubt. However I feel like many of the classics like this, Lord of the flies act kill children's interest in reading as they re forced to read these dry, often boring books.

I read Harry Potter when it first came out so I did enjoy reading. But it seemed every book the schools made you read were out of date books written over 50 years ago that would be boring to any teen

reply

Have to kindly disagree. Books like this get teens thinking. It is too advanced for young children though.

reply

It's too advanced for most teens too. It seems like a fair amount of adults as well.

reply

thinking about how boring it is. if you don't entice someone with something interesting, no matter how well written, profound, deep ect you lost them. Especially when you are basically continually giving kids bad experiences with books over and over again, l engraining in them that they are dry, boring out of date relics.

now I love reading because I found what I like, but in high school it was painful

reply

Yeah, every book doesn't need to be profound and a bit difficult due to changes in culture but to act like people shouldn't have some exposure to books that challenge them on multiple levels. Otherwise reading becomes like having cake and coca-cola for every meal.

If someone is a reader they're going to understand this and if someone isn't a reader then the reading of this one book isn't going to do any more damage than what they've already done to themselves. Your attitude is the boring, out-of-date relic.

reply

obv it wasn't 100% of kids, but I dint know a single kid/teen excited for our English classes book we were reading that year. No one ever discussed it with passion. it was just generic "what was the meaning" or "what metaphors were used"

they took all excitement out of it. which was part the book choice, part the teaching style I guess. not saying all English classes should switch to Harry Potter, but the excitement that series actually generated among kids, was never replicated by one of the generic "classics" we were forced to read you can have it both ways, read significant literature that is exciting, not just significant literature that is boring and turns kids off reading.

I am a reader. my attitude is the opposite of boring and out-of-date. I am saying "lets read relevant books that will actually get kids excited and sparks their interest in literature because it can be both educational and fun" rather than "okay lets go through the checklist of "classics" because they are classics no matter how dull, how boring, how unexciting, how little it will engage kids. even if it makes the, put in almost zero effort, as long as we crossed out grade 10 to kill a mockingbird thats all that matters.

reply

To Kill a Mockingbird, Lord of the Flies, Of Mice and Men...These books are not only monotonous but they are downright depressing. I guess some time in the 1950s some masochists in charge of the school boards decided to inflict this stuff on students and it never went away. If teachers want to open a child's eyes to a wonderful world through reading, that definitely isn't the way.

reply

I didn't even think of that but yes maybe that is partly why as a high energy optimistic child I hated them

reply

Well boys especially weren't designed to be stuck in a box for 7 hours a day...being told to sit still and be quiet then on top of that they shove that dreck in front of them.

reply

Theyre all basically 20 years or older.

reply

LOTflies - 68 years old

to kill a mockingbird - 82

mice and men -85

I think our education system may be out of date and only focused on "old is good"

reply

Harry Potter isn't a step up. The problem however is that teachers are lazy and don't want to do anything more than they have to. So they know that with a book like To Kill a Mockingbird that all the symbolism and questions have been neatly set out in a Cliff Notes book so they don't have to read the book themselves nor figure anything out. Though there are many more books that are forced on students far worse than this one. The Outsiders was required reading for me in school and my daughters had to read the damn thing when they were in school as well. That is a complete turd of a book that makes To Kill a Mockingbird look like the greatest book ever written in comparison.

In a perfect world the students would have a list of books they could read so that they were reading books that they had some interest in... instead they are forced to read the same book which guarantees that a large number of students will be bored shitless and hate reading every page. But hey, it makes it easy for the teachers and that's all that matter in schools in America.

reply

ohh we had to read the outsiders too. as hyper jet above said, another depressing dreary book in decades long part

I mean its more a curriculum thing that teachers have to follow and maybe they are only allowed to pick one of these few "classics"

reply

I never understood how the Outsiders made it on the list of supposed classics, of all the books I ever read in school it was the most ridiculous crock of shit I can ever remember... but I still remember the crazy ass teacher acting like it was so realistic and good... As if any god damn gang in the world would be calling their members Pony Boy or Soda Pop... I suppose if you gang of flamboyant gay boys it might happen... but supposed knife wielding gang member in the US? It was so clear it was written by some dumb as girl with no clue that it wasn't even funny.

And I can only speak for my state and they don't have a list of books that teachers are required to force on kids. I two daughters that went to the same high school and it was a matter of which teacher you had as to what book you were forced to read so not even any consistency in the same school it call boiled down to what the teacher decided.

reply

she wrote the outsiders in high school....it explains a lot.. we are basically reading the 60s equivalent of Christopher Paolini and told its great literature...

It seems all these books are dark, depressing "coming of age". outsiders, lord of the flies, to kill a mockingbird, all end on depressing sad notes.

ya not sure if it varies state to state but it must country to country.

reply

This is one of my favorite books, but then, I had never read it until about seven years ago, mainly out of curiosity over it being hailed as "classic literature." Somehow I made it all the way through school without this ever showing up on a required reading list. A miracle, perhaps?

Had I been forced to read it in school, most likely I would have ended up sharing your opinion of it. This is a book for adults. Just because the main characters are children doesn't make it a story for all ages.

reply

they think because its a "coming of age" story kids will like it. who was I supposed to relate to as a child in the outsiders, catcher, to kill a mockingbird

reply

Well when I was in high school in the early 80s I hated it so much I didn’t pay any attention in my classes and never did any homework assignments including reading assignments. All I did was play AD&D and play with Rubik’s cube. I was pretty much failing everything. The only reading assignment I did do was to read “To Kill a Mockingbird” and I have loved the book ever since. I even recorded it on videotape at home and edited out the commercials so the teacher could play it in class. It is probably the inly single time in high school I showed any academic initiative.

reply

Well to be fair you didnt sound like a well adjusted child soooo kinda proves my point. if Mockingbird only appealed to the anti social D&D Rubik's cube kid with zero interest in any subject at all then you aren't exactly a good indicator of the norm.

im not trying to be rude, it's just objective they shouldn't do a curriculum for the outliers

reply

Here's the link to SparkNotes

https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/

Top Titles

1984
To Kill A Mockingbird
Catcher In The Rye
Lord Of The Flies
Dracula (Bram Stoker)

And I don't know if these other books below the "Top Titles" are up there because they are "Next Top Titles"

Beowulf
The Canterbury Tales
Heart of Darkness
Huck Finn
The Scarlet Letter
A Tale of Two Cities

I was in high school in the early 1980s and the only titles above that I don't think anyone was assigned were Heart of Darkness and Dracula.

reply

Here are some available SparkNotes titles you might buy:

Brokeback Mountain
The Da Vinci Code
Charlotte's Web
The Hunger Games
A Christmas Carol
Diary Of A Wimpy Kid

reply

If you spend your life reading the same fantasy books you liked as a child, you'll never mature as a reader. One of the goals of teaching literature in school is to introduce students to deeper, more complex, and ultimately more interesting fiction. Unfortunately, many people react, even in adulthood, the way most here do.

reply

Agreed.

reply

yes ive never read anything past Harry Potter. try again. this time make a coherent intelligent post

reply