obv it wasn't 100% of kids, but I dint know a single kid/teen excited for our English classes book we were reading that year. No one ever discussed it with passion. it was just generic "what was the meaning" or "what metaphors were used"
they took all excitement out of it. which was part the book choice, part the teaching style I guess. not saying all English classes should switch to Harry Potter, but the excitement that series actually generated among kids, was never replicated by one of the generic "classics" we were forced to read you can have it both ways, read significant literature that is exciting, not just significant literature that is boring and turns kids off reading.
I am a reader. my attitude is the opposite of boring and out-of-date. I am saying "lets read relevant books that will actually get kids excited and sparks their interest in literature because it can be both educational and fun" rather than "okay lets go through the checklist of "classics" because they are classics no matter how dull, how boring, how unexciting, how little it will engage kids. even if it makes the, put in almost zero effort, as long as we crossed out grade 10 to kill a mockingbird thats all that matters.
reply
share