MovieChat Forums > Mysterious Island (1961) Discussion > Beardless Callan and skimpy minidress

Beardless Callan and skimpy minidress


Ah, yes, the box office sex-appeal teen demographic: after days of being on the balloon and upon arriving at the island, we see that Michael Callan hasn't got a bit of stubble on him, as opposed to his hairy compatriots. And of course an English Victorian upper class lady would sew her young attractive niece a skintight leather "dress that reaches down to about navel level. Me, I was more excited about the boiled crab; ah! a nice seafood dinner washed down with goat's milk.

reply

Well, I don't care for the circumstances as long as Beth Rogan was wearing the skintight leather dress!

reply

I agree with Big.

Beth Rogan looked fetching in that cave girl outfit.

Seeing the movie numerous times over the years, I can never decide if the yellow panties she wears underneath are real panties or just part of a swimsuit or something. Now there's a piece of trivia worth knowing! I guess they chose the yellow color in an attempt to match the goatskin dress

Seriously, this movie has it all-- great story, old fashioned stop motion effects, a wonderful score, pirates, Captain Nemo, and of course Beth Rogan providing the eye candy in a mini leather goat skin.

Ever see the recent re-make? ask yourself this: why can you re-watch the original version over and over again and just roll your eyes when you think of the re-make?

Because the original has it all, and I can look at Beth Rogan's legs in that film all day long.

These days everything's so politically correct.

AE36

reply

I agree that "Mysterious Island" has it all. Beth Rogan in her leather miniskirt is a definite highlight.

reply

"I can look at Beth Rogan's legs in that film all day long."

Amen and hallelujah to that!



All the universe . . . or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?

reply

"I can look at Beth Rogan's legs in that film all day long."

Amen and hallelujah to that!


Amen!

Her legs, her derrière, her cute face, her arms, her hands, her feet -- the whole package! God is Good!



My 175 (or so) Favorite Movies:
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls070122364/

reply

I can look at legs women's all day long and not worry about being politically correct.

And this film was shot in 1961 - how much more politically were they back then?



Cats are delicate dainty animals who suffer from a variety of ailments ... except insomnia.

reply

Agreed, Urciolo.

I've never understood the criticism on this point (Beth Rogan's skimpy goatskin dress).

In this film you have:

1). A Civil war balloon that manages to go from the east coast of the United States across the country and then something like 5 or 6,000 miles in to the south pacific.

2). The people on the balloon land on an island that happens to be occupied by Captain Nemo and a disabled Nautilus.

3). Coincidently, they arrive on the island shortly before it is to be destroyed by a volcanic eruption.

4). Also coincidently, a shipwreck brings additional people to the island shortly after the balloon crew lands.

5). Pirates have an interest in the obscure island, thousands of miles from nowhere.

6). Captain Nemo is conducting experiments and creating giant plants and animals.

______________________________

So we can have all the above but the big problem is that a proper Victorian lady would not run around in cave girl attire revealing a lot of leg?

It's a fantasy movie that you have to take on its own terms, and I wouldn't change a thing.

I've said this before and I'll say it again: Beth Rogan's legs are a major part of the mix that makes this movie so re-watchable and a classic. Not the only thing of course, but its a major element.

People remember this movie and view it again and again over the years. How come they don't do the same with the re-make?

AE36

reply

Seeing the movie numerous times over the years, I can never decide if the yellow panties she wears underneath are real panties or just part of a swimsuit or something. Now there's a piece of trivia worth knowing! I guess they chose the yellow color in an attempt to match the goatskin dress


I would think it has to be the equivalent of cheer shorts she is wearing. There's no way she would be wearing just panties (and exposing them constantly) at that time and place in that type of film. Regardless, the outfit was sexy, sexy, sexy (as the late Beth Rogan was, too).

No blah, blah, blah!

reply

Its a fantasy movie. And the sexy young Callan and Rogan fit in this fantasy. I loved them. All young and cute in those tight little outfits. Beth inher dress and Herbert in his tight, little leather underware. I just wonder what the giant bees would have done to them if they had caught Herbert and Elena. Why did the bees seal them up to begin with?

reply

One thing that has always puzzled me is why it took so long for the minidress to arrive. For ex, in the SUPERMAN comics I read in the 50s, the typical dress of Kryptonian women were very revealing mini-outfits that even by today's standards were very slinky and sexy. Paris and Britney would have loved them!

reply

I was watching a Rick Steves travel show about Pompeii, and they showed tile art that had women wearing two piece bathing suits. Rick commented that he thought bikinis were a modern invention, not 2,000 years old!



reply

If I'm not mistaken, the mosaic in question is meant to depict female athletes. Which means they could actually be wearing the world's first sports bras!


All the universe . . . or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?

reply



Gordon P. Clarkson I dare say they would but I for one would not like to see them wearing them .As they might say themselves "Gag Me with a spoon ! "

reply

One would think, in this day and age, the sight of a girl in a mini-dress showing her legs would not be regarded as anything special. I'm continually surprised by what is thought of as sexy.

reply

And don't forget Anne Francis’ fetching minidresses in Forbidden Planet, or the short outfits worn by the Venusian maidens in Queen of Outer Space. Mary Quant didn't invent squat!



All the universe . . . or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?

reply

Several possibilities why the bee sealed them in: 1) as future food for their larvae--but this doesn't make much sense as bees feed their larvae honey; the larvae are incapable of eating organisms;
2) to remove them as threats to their larvae; but then, why not just pull them out of the cell and kill them?;
3) most likely and the one I like best: once inside the cell the bee's innate behavior was triggered to perceive the humans as larvae and so sealed them in safekeep them for their future emergence. The drawback to this idea is that bees are programmed to unseal the cells once the larvae start moving, and these human "larvae" were definitely moving. But maybe the instinct to seal them in, since the cell was already unsealed, overrode the instinct to let them out.

reply

They sealed them in because they're BEES! They're stupid friggin’ BEES!!!


All the universe . . . or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?

reply

Coming up next: can bees think? A recent study confirms that no, they cannot.

reply

Why did the bees seal them up to begin with?


I think it was food for later or for upcoming offspring

reply

underwear not underware

suzycreamcheese RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008

reply

And 3/4th of the way through the film, Michael still has perfectly groomed hair - complete with the greasy kid stuff that was so popular back then (nowadays, it's only used at Jiffy Lube).



Cats are delicate dainty animals who suffer from a variety of ailments ... except insomnia.

reply

I liked the bearded clams that came along.

reply