Three Substance-Abused Stars


Judgment at Nuremberg is dramatic and memorable for a lot of reasons, certainly starting with the subject matter, and moving on to the truly all-star cast assembled for it.

But three of those stars make it just that much more memorable:

In order: Montgomery Clift, Judy Garland, Spencer Tracy.

The issue is substance abuse, and its impacts on the actors and how they acted.

Clift and Garland were brought in to play "dramatic cameos." Neither is in the film very long. I believe that Clift gets one scene, and Garland two, but I might be wrong. And the film somewhat suggests that in casting these "damaged" people from real life as people who were damaged by the Nazis...their real life debilitation would transfer to their fictional characters.

It did. Especially with Clift, who -- from the combination of heavy drinking and drugging, as well as the 1957 car accident that had frozen and distorted his face -- was in bad shape when he performed this role. The line readings given by his slow-witted character are fitting FOR the character, but there was also something clearly wrong with Clift as he tried to act. The record shows that Clift kept having trouble with his lines AND his ability to "keep it together" on set, and finally Spencer Tracy gently asked Clift to "play the scene to me, Monty, say the lines only to me" -- and that got Clift through it. (Clift evidently also did the whole scene twice..he didn't like his first version.)

Judy Garland's acting is not nearly so out of control as Clift's in Nuremberg, but she came to the set after a long time away from movies and with people worried that she could not handle the role(Julie Harris was considered before Garland was given the role) or would be tempestuous. But she was fine. Her weight and her middle- aged appearance were giveaways of a sort She would lose the weight -- too much -- as drugs kept having their way with her. But Garland's susbstance abuse issues were more "behind the scenes" in this film -- a sense that all was not well with her.

Which brings us to Spencer Tracy. He's fine in the film, and spends much of the first half saying nothing but sometimes conveying great conflict in his silence. He has a long speech at the end that he evidently had entirely memorized and he gives it well.

But a lifetime of very heavy drinking had prematurely aged the man. He was 61 but looked more like 81. Snow white hair. Deep wrinkles. And in Nuremberg, the start of a rather frail appearance(he'd once been a stocky man) that preshadowed his coming death too young at 67. Still, Tracy -- unlike Clift and unlike Garland behind the scenes -- COULD handle what substance abuse had done to him.

Maybe it was even more of a burden then, but we glorify and idolize our movie stars and some of them just can't take it The set of Judgment at Nuremberg must have been an interesting place on the few days that Clift and Garland were there. Tracy was there almost all the time - and kept it together.

Still, a great movie that also stands as a record of how three performers messed themselves up with drink and drugs.

reply

Have you heard about the Bruce Lee "drug letters" that were recently (July 2021) sold at auction? They (if authentic) paint a picture of a man with an escalating cocaine taking (and perhaps even cocaine DEALING) habit. If these letters are true, it would put a whole new spin on the events surrounding his death - the official story of which never added up anyway. On one hand, he must have been had it together enough to accomplish as much as he did in the last year of his life, but on the other hand, it shows how it is possible to cover up a serious drug problem - for a while anyway - if enablers are present. A certain person (I won't name them here) was also implicated in the drug smuggling aspect of the story, and appears to have had full knowledge of his habit cocaine habit at the time. This person has claimed Bruce never took hard drugs and has nursed his "Kung Fu Philosopher/Monk" image all these years.

reply

Have you heard about the Bruce Lee "drug letters" that were recently (July 2021) sold at auction? They (if authentic) paint a picture of a man with an escalating cocaine taking (and perhaps even cocaine DEALING) habit.

---

No, I have not heard about these letters ...until now. Thank you, I like to get educated on Hollywood (China?) lore.

--

If these letters are true, it would put a whole new spin on the events surrounding his death - the official story of which never added up anyway.

--

It was one of those "too young" deaths that are always troubling and in this case (as opposed to say, John Belushi) Lee was an extremely fit man.

--
On one hand, he must have been had it together enough to accomplish as much as he did in the last year of his life, but on the other hand, it shows how it is possible to cover up a serious drug problem - for a while anyway - if enablers are present.

--

I daresay that Hollywood stars and other talent have always had enablers. The studio assigned "an ambulance with fake medics" to collect Spencer Tracy from bars during his days-long binges. Eventually, he was just too big a star NOT to coddle. There are also drug SELLERS all around the talent -- director Sam Peckinpah shifted from being a boozer to being a druggie because guys on set sold to him all the time.

Its hard to say. I know that recreational drug taking has worked long and well(and to little adverse effect) with a lot of our musicians -- The Stones, Jimmy Buffett, a lot of them are all still here. One Stone DID die from drugs, but it was like an "occupational hazard." But for all the rockers and movie stars who have done just fine with drugs (Nicholson for one). we have all the famous stories of Jimi and Janis and Jim...and Belushi and Philip Seymour Hoffman...

CONT

reply

Cocaine reportedly derailed the star careers of George Segal and James Caan in the 80s'...they couldn't function on set. And yet Jane Fonda said that most sets she worked on had cocaine use and somehow those movies got made and were good.

This was "way down the food chain" in celebrity, but in late 2021, we got a report of four "low level" celebs(stand up comics and their woman friend) taking cocaine laced with fentanyl. Three of the four died; the fourth (who seems to be a mix of stand-up comic and Playboy playmate) has survived and is rehabbing.

The fentanyl part of the story is murderous, but the surviving "hottie comic" pretty much has left a trail of drug use stories that suggest, hey -- its just what they do in Hollywood. Says she: "When you take drugs, you are signing a contract that you might die sooner than you wanted to."

reply

I've heard it was James Caan that introduced Peckinpah to cocaine on the set of The Killer Elite. James Coburn - another Peckinpah crony - was a user as well, and (along with Steve McQueen), probably introduced Bruce Lee to the coke scene during his time in Hollywood. Bruce's craving for the higher quality powder he was accustomed to in California is what lead to his friend Bob Baker smuggling it into Hong Kong for him (allegedly).

P.S. I know you're a fan of Tarantino (I must confess, I'm not), and his somewhat derogatory take down of Bruce Lee in Once Upon A Time in Hollywood (the movie and subsequent novel) came out just a year or two before this story broke. Maybe Tarantino knew something we didn't?

reply

I've heard it was James Caan that introduced Peckinpah to cocaine on the set of The Killer Elite.

--

Yes, I read that as well. If you LOOK at The Killer Elite, you will see scenes where James Caan is rather joking around, not following the script -- I think you are seeing the drugs on screen.

Around this time, Charles Bronson refused to do a movie for Sam Peckinpah, saying: "I won't work with a drunk."

Soon, Peckinpah -- such a great violent artist of his day -- was literally unemployable and filming second unit for friend Don Siegel(on Jinxed.) Though I think he got one more movie to make near his end. The Osterman Weekend.

--

James Coburn - another Peckinpah crony - was a user as well, and (along with Steve McQueen), probably introduced Bruce Lee to the coke scene during his time in Hollywood.

--

Coburn ended up with some major health problems at a fairly young age -- I always wondered if the drugs did it. Maybe not.

--

Bruce's craving for the higher quality powder he was accustomed to in California is what lead to his friend Bob Baker smuggling it into Hong Kong for him (allegedly).

--

Hmm...well, Hollywood has the best of everything.

CONT


reply

P.S. I know you're a fan of Tarantino (I must confess, I'm not),

--

That's OK...in addition to those who "are not a fan," he has his share of people(mainly young people) who just hate him. But Hitchcock had haters as well -- its comes in reaction to "greatest director" talk. In both cases, "overrated" gets bandied about. But in both cases, those guys made movies head and shoulders above their peers -- for entertainment AND for art.

That said, there are many scenes in several QT movies I really can't stand -- in Kill Bill, in Death Proof, in Inglorious Basterds -- and yet he STILL gets my vote. Key, I think, is that I'm not under 30(where many of his haters are.) I "get" the 60's and 70's movies and soundtracks he is referencing. He's also a great writer and developed a surprising knack for action.

--

and his somewhat derogatory take down of Bruce Lee in Once Upon A Time in Hollywood (the movie and subsequent novel) came out just a year or two before this story broke. Maybe Tarantino knew something we didn't?

--

Yes. Tarantino was silent when Bruce Lee's daughter was flinging allegations of racism QT's way, but he came out of COVID hiding to give interviews on his novel of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood and said he based that scene on "actual testimony" given to him by Hollywood stunt men in researching that movie. Key: they said that Lee didn't pull punches during stunt fights, liked to hit the stuntmen for real. Who to believe?

CONT

reply

Similarly, James Garner wrote that actor Tony Franciosa kept hitting stuntmen for real while they filmed "A Man Could Get Killed" -- and it only ended, said Garner, when "I had to pop him one." Movie sets can be mean and violent when tough guys get together.

And: though its a "fiction" the James Garner movie "Marlowe" (1969) has Bruce Lee playing a character pretty arrogantly -- I'll bet QT showed this movie to his actor to get his performance down. Garner goads the Lee character into a missed flying drop kick off the top of a skyscraper -- by suggesting to Lee "You're kinda gay, aren't ya?" -- another "They couldn't do that today" movie moment.

reply

Garner would have been de-platformed for being homophobic and anti-Asian. LOL I don't mind criticism of Lee, he was no saint as he was portrayed after death. Part of the problem with these letters (if they are true) is that the Bruce Lee Estate has denied almost of negative stuff about him and painted him as a saint. Now that his halo has fallen a bit I think it's better in the long run if we accept that he had amazing talent but also some big flaws.

reply

Garner would have been de-platformed for being homophobic and anti-Asian.

--

Likely. As a political matter, Garner was a lifelong liberal Democrat, but movies were given a different latitude back then. In 1969 his tough macho hetero private eye could say that.

Bruce Lee has two scenes in Marlowe. He's sent by the mob to make Garner's Philip Marlowe(from the Raymond Chandler novels) drop the case. Scene one: Marlowe refuses Lee's bribe, Lee impressively destroys Garner's office furniture and glass door, and high kicks his ceiling light off.

Scene two: on the penthouse rooftop of a skyscraper, Lee circles Garner to kill him and gets the "gay" line and kicks off into space and death. "Ha ha."

Its worth seeing as "bad nostalgia." I'll bet QT saw it, and (again) I bet QT showed it to his actor playing Lee.

---

reply

I don't mind criticism of Lee, he was no saint as he was portrayed after death.

---

Well, QT refused to cut that scene for release in China; he stood by it and lost some big bucks(but he's rich enough.)

Lee's DAUGHTER defended him, but that's what daughters are suppposed to do(and she made sure to get internet press with the racism angle -- which QT wasn't having any part of.)

--Part of the problem with these letters (if they are true) is that the Bruce Lee Estate has denied almost of negative stuff about him and painted him as a saint. Now that his halo has fallen a bit I think it's better in the long run if we accept that he had amazing talent but also some big flaws.

--

Yes. Look, I think that a lot of us simply wouldn't want to know about the dark side of our major actors. They make incredible amounts of money. They are coddled by producers and worshiped by fans. They can DO ANYTHING THEY WANT. That includes marital cheating and drugs and alco hol abuse and..worse.

In all eras, there seem to have been some "regular people type" stars. But some just want to do everything and everybody...and anything.

reply