A very long dream sequence


I recently re-watched The Absent Minded Professor after many, many years. There were aspects of the movie that I missed completely when I watched it as a kid. Ned Brainard's behavior, as well as other aspects of the movie, seem to make sense only if we assume the movie is all just a dream.

1) We have a man who left his fiance standing at the alter three times. If that is typical of his behavior, how did he ever get her to agree to marry him?

2) Brainard is supposed to be a full professor, but apparently he has never published in a peer reviewed journal or anywhere else. When he invented flubber and wanted to interest the government, all he knew to do was to phone Washington.

3) Twice in the movie, head on collisions resulted in no injuries and little damage to the cars.

4) Throughout the movie, Brainard engaged in multiple unethical, illegal and dangerous acts with no repercussions. He tried to kill his rival and failed solely due to the bizarre dream physics. He cheated to help his team win at basketball, and endangered the lives of the players by treating their shoes with a dangerous substance without their knowledge.

5) All the Medfield basketball players wore the same size shoe, or Brainard was able by sight to match shoes with feet.

I could go on and on. I suspect Ned Brainard was not a college professor, with a pretty fiance, who made an important discovery, thereby becoming rich and famous. I think he was on the college's janitorial staff, but had Walter Mitty dreams.

reply

[deleted]

There are a lot of highly educated idiots.

Brainard had a lot of book knowledge just not a lot of commun sense.

reply

[deleted]

Great reply GG!

reply

Didn't you get the name of the movie? ABSENT MINDED Professor, he had a habit of getting so involved with what he was working on and forgot the time, it was a fault but not an intentional one on his part.

He did not try to kill his rival, he was just giving him a hard time for coming in between him and his fiancee.

You are taking this movie far too seriously.

reply

One important thing that perhaps you've neglected to consider:

IT'S JUST A MOVIE--A Sci-Fi/comedy Disney movie.

I think you hav to consider this in the same vein as any Laurel and Hardy 2 reeler, or Marx Brothers' flicks--they're just comedic entertainment, not bound by the constraints of reality, but by the delights of young kids who want to believe that Model Ts can fly and high school basketball players can bounce their way from an insurmountable deficit to winning the game.

From this movie Fred MacMurray went on to My Three Sons, another vehicle for his comedic talent.

It's easy to OVERTHINK a flight of fantasy, but what fun is there in that?

reply

sbrian1 says > I recently re-watched The Absent Minded Professor after many, many years. There were aspects of the movie that I missed completely when I watched it as a kid. Ned Brainard's behavior, as well as other aspects of the movie, seem to make sense only if we assume the movie is all just a dream.
You explained it yourself. When you first saw the movie as a child you missed all the things you noticed later because most kids aren't worried about those details. They just enjoy what they're seeing. I never saw this movie growing up and only just saw it today. I was aware of it but always expected it to be too silly and nonsensical to be entertaining.

All the points you made are, of course, legitimate and there were, I think, many more 'problems' with the movie. They're hard to miss yet I laughed and laughed and really enjoyed watching it in all its silliness.

I'm a critical thinker by nature. I tend to analyze everything, including movies, but every now and then it's good to just enjoy things for what they are. The movie was made to make us laugh and, on that, it certainly delivers.


Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]

reply