Quentin Tarantino Dumps on Alfred Hitchcock -- Four Times
Quentin Tarantino may be a lot of things, but one thing he is, now in 2023 as I post this, is:
A famous auteur filmmaker, and not a 'cult" filmmaker, either. His movies are big hits all over the world. His movies are nominated in the big Oscar categories, and sometimes win: Best Supporting Actor for Christoph Waltz twice and Brad Pitt once. Two Best Original Screenplay Oscars.
QT rather shares his fame, I think, with that grand old master of the 1920s through the 1970s: Alfred Hitchcock.
Both men worked in "thrillers" or genre pieces; people die violently in almost all of their films. QT branched out into Westerns and a WWII movie but maintained Hitchcock's sense of style and violence and perversity.
Both men have followings -- Hitchcock had more then, but QT has plenty now.
And I think this: both Hitchcock and QT were strange looking, strange talking men whose personalities "in person" don't really fit the grand cinematic style and power and sophistication of their movies. In short, two weird guys who excited the world with their movies, not their personalities(though QT landed a supermodel wife and plenty of chicks before her, looks didn't much matter if you are as rich and famous as QT in todays hollywood.)
QT rather sidestepped talking about Hitchcock in the beginning. Sometimes he could be a bit snarky ("I don't get why Hitchcock is like God, OK?") sometimes he would be more conciliatory. QT's biggest "bad quote" on Hitchocck is that he preferred the cheapjack 1983 sequel "Psycho II"(directed by the little-known, little-active Richard Franklin) to the original. Balderdash.
But I've gone looking recently and found QT to be a bit more over-all insulting about Hitchcock, and I think its worth some rebuttal.
Here are the QT quotes I have found so far:
ONE: "People discover North by Northwest at 22 and think its wonderful when actually it is a very mediocre movie."
TWO: "I've always felt that Hitchcock's acolytes took his cinematic and story ideas further. I love Brian De Palma's Hitchcock movies. I love Richard Franklin's 7and Curtis Hanson's Hitchcock meditations. I prefer those to actual Hitchcock."
THREE: "The 50s held him down, Hitchcock couldn't do what he, left to his own devices, would've wanted to do. By the time he could do it in the late 60s and early 70s, he was a little too old. If he could have gone where he wanted to go in the early 60s and through the 50's, he would have been a different filmmaker."
FOUR: "While DePalma liked making thrillers(for a little while at least), I doubt he loved watching them. Hitchcockian thrillers were, for him, a means to an end. That's why when he was forced to return to the genre the mid-eighties, they were so lacklustre. Ultimately , he resented having to make them Hitchcock's Frenzy might be a piece of crap, but I doubt Alfred was bored making it."
Hmm.
CONT