Spielberg's West Side Story is "Oscar Frontrunner"; Why wasn't Van Sant's Psycho?
December 2021:
a lot of first reviews are in on Spielberg's West Side Story -- not necessarily from "name" critics, but do we have those anymore? Bottom line: raves. "The movie to beat at the Oscars...front runner for Best Picture."
Let's take that last, first. Could it be? A movie from the same material as the 1961 Best Picture winner wins Best Picture ...with versions 60 years apart?
It sounds like too much. But Oscar competition is not what it was -- it COULD happen.
Also: another blow to the "Tarantino theory" of aged directors doing poor work. Spielberg is 74 -- older than when Hitchcock made Frenzy(a hit, I'll grant you) but closer to when he made Family Plot(a good but not great "old man's movie") and later had to quit for health reasons. Spielberg's West Side Story feels like a bigger deal than Family Plot, or even Frenzy. I'm assuming that Mr. Spielberg will remain forever young. (His next movie is about his own childhood...)
BUT: we are waiting to see how the box office does on the new WSS. As I've noted, modernly , it seems like movies just can't fail with international markets, so I expect bigger numbers than for Van Sant's Psycho of 1998. Ha.
Speaking of Van Sant's Psycho, I DO remember a 1998 article before it came out wondering if the movie could actually WIN OSCARS based on its 1960 greatness -- or at least get nominated. The article was written before Van Sant's Psycho came out, so the speculation was rampant.
The main item being promoted for Oscar in the article was Joseph Stefano's slight update of his great(but unnominated) 1960 screenplay from the Robert Bloch book.
I recall this pushing me to "flights of fancy"(having not yet seen Van Sant's Psycho): if Stefano's screenplay could be nominated, how about Herrmann's score?
And..how about Van Sant as Best Director -- which would be HITCHCOCK as Best Director since Van Sant simply aped his shots. (Hitchcock WAS nominated Best Director for Psycho -- one of only five nominations -- but he lost to Billy Wilder for The Apartment.)
In 1960, Janet Leigh had been nominated for Best Supporting Actress. Could Anne Heche repeat? As we've learned from 2010, Jeff Bridges could get a nomination for playing the same role John Wayne played in True Grit in 1969 (and Wayne WON.)
Other than Best Director and Best Supporting Actress, Psycho was only also nominated in 1960 for Best Black and White Art Direction and Best Black and White Cinematography -- those categories were gone in 1998/1999.
So again, (thinking at the time): Could Van Sant's Psycho "give Hitchcock decades late redemption" for such snubs as:
No Best Picture nom (THAT was psycho)
No Best Actor nom(Anthony Perkins for all time -- could Vince Vaughn compete)
No Best Screenplay nom
No Best Score nom (Herrmann for all time -- THAT was psycho)
No Best Film Editing nom(The SHOWER scene? THAT was psycho)
No Best Supporting Actor nom( Mr. Balsam -- his best work in his most famous role)
William H. Macy as Arbogast '98 didn't help his chances when he told an interviewer on the set of Van Sant's Psycho: "I just spent four hours today in front of a green screen -- faking like I was falling down stairs. Its not the kind of work that gets you an Oscar."
But is SHOULD have been, Bill -- for Martin Balsam at least. And for his other scenes, too.
Meanwhile, on the commentary track for the Van Sant Psycho DVD, Anne Heche said she didn't feel her performance should be compared to Janet Leigh's: "Its not like its a wrestling match or something." An interesting concept across time and space.
And Vince Vaughn certainly knew that he was taking on perfection, but was game to try something different in the Perkins role.
Meanwhile, a dismissive Julianne Moore was caught on video on set saying "I don't have a role to play, here." (Lila.) Oh, Vera Miles did OK by it.
--
Anyway, came its release date in December of 1998 (Oscar season, after all) with its failed box office and bad reviews, Van Sant's Psycho faded fast and Oscar was nowhere near on the table.
But...perhaps it SHOULD have been. A number of critics DID write "Hey, its good enough - its Psycho after all."
But subjectively Anne Heche did NOT give a performance as good as Janet Leigh(too twitchy and "on the nose." )Vince Vaughn did NOT give a performance as good as Anthony Perkins(physically wrong for the part, he was also clearly not comfortable with the role as a "fit.") Macy was pretty good if miscast as Arbogast -- but he didn't WANT an Oscar nom for it. ("Actually, I think most of Hitchcock is pretty lame," he said to the outrage of, well, no one.)
OK, so no 1998 acting noms for Van Sant's Psycho. And no Best Picture(though why not -- it honored Hitchcock's original by bringing it back pretty close to intact.)
But what about these?
CONT