MovieChat Forums > Psycho (1960) Discussion > OT: Mid-Year 2020: The Day The Movies ...

OT: Mid-Year 2020: The Day The Movies Died?


Its July 2020, and I've taken to eating out in the parking lots of some of my favorite local restaurants -- its the only way to "dine in" as COVID-19 woes continue. This should work through, oh, October when the weather worsens.

Meanwhile, Major League Baseball has played a few games outdoors with either NO people in the stands or -- quite oddly -- life-sized photographs of fans in the seats(photos paid for by each such fan.)

Its all very strange and "half measured," but..."improvise, adapt, overcome."

There HAD been a plan to open movie theaters with certain restrictions -- requiring seats and entire rows to be empty, staggered screenings , popcorn restrictions(or NO popcorn?) but with this move to "outdoor seating only" in restaurants, movie theaters have been closed down again.

And thus...no new movies. One by one, "tenatative" announcements that movies WOULD play...maybe in late July(Nolan's "Tenet") maybe in August (Wonder Woman II) are falling by the wayside, and a "pile-up" of movies in the fall and winter(like Top Gun 2) are now "indefinitely delayed." I think the new Bond is still scheduled for Thanksgiving but -- COVID-19 isn't subsiding(enough?) and the return of cold winter weather brings cold and flu season "on the natural."

The Oscar academy is trying to save its show: it got moved to April of 2021. Irony: that event USED to be in April, then moved up to March, then moved up to February(a "sweeps month" for the counting of Nielsen ratings.) The question is: will enough quality movies be released in 2020 to fill an Oscar ballot and...will the Academy countenance a bunch of movies that NEVER play in theaters? (They may -- that Oscar ceremony brings in $75 million and funds the Academy for the year; they CAN'T cancel it.)

Still, "all things considered," one wonders if Hollywood should just throw in the towel on 2020 entirely -- move ALL major movies into 2021, leave movie history with a great big blank gap in 2020 -- the year no Oscars were given; the year no summer blockbusters appeared.

(Note in passing: I saw a heading for an article , in the NYT, I think entitled "A Summer with No Superheroes -- Is That Really a Bad Thing?" or something like that. I couldn't get through the paywall, but I could guess at the content of the article.)

A bit "on topic:" -- Alongside high school and college graduations, and marriages, if a level or two down -- are the young memories we all have of "those great movies that dominated a summer of our lives." For me, Jaws and Star Wars started that summer feeling(I've read that Psycho played that role in '60)....and Alien was a pretty big deal...then in the 80's, it all busted loose: Empire Strikes Back, Raiders of the Lost Ark, ET, Ghostbusters...The Untouchables, Die Hard, Batman....great memories of the big summer entertainment events against which I lived my life(and loves.)

It looks like...in 2020...a generation is going to lose those events. For a year.

Oh, well. Its a matter of life and death(for now?)...its a historic reminder of how fragile life is...

...but damn.

A year without movies.

I never thought I'd see the day. Maybe I still won't...

reply

It looks like...in 2020...a generation is going to lose those events. For a year.
In NZ we're back to normal internally - bars, sports, restaurants, cinemas, schools all open without restriction. International travel/tourism (about 10% of the economy), however, is still almost totally shut down by 14 day quarantine requirements, etc..

The US does seem like it's in a terrible state by comparison: an enormous economic hit so far for almost no gain! 65K new cases per day and well over 1K deaths per day is *awful*. (The US lost about 300 lives per day on average during WW2 and even when you correct for population size the US's Covid daily death rate per million is higher than WW2. It is a preventable but unprevented WW2-level catastrophe that the US is currently going through.) And these economic and medical problems only scratch the surface of what the US has on its plate right now. Most prominently, a mad king and his lunatic followers, and a racial and policing reckoning that would be difficult under even the most enlightened administration. The Mad King in question never even *tries* to be president of the whole country rather than just his base, and is a positive fount of daily misinformation and malevolence. (Any country would be deeply challenged by a Mad King problem of this ilk.) Some wits have suggested that 2020 is like a fusion of 1968, 1929, and 1918, with a bit of Watergate/1974 thrown in for good measure. Yikes.

reply

Lol perfectly stated

reply

In NZ we're back to normal internally - bars, sports, restaurants, cinemas, schools all open without restriction.

--

An interesting "inverse mirror image." So the movie studios COULD open Wonder Woman II and Top Gun 2 right now in NZ and draw what dollars can be made.

I wonder if that will eventually be what happens globally if the US can't put new movies in theaters until, say 2022.

That said, in a year when the "big blockbusters" ARE Wonder Woman II and Top Gun II (and "Black Widow" from the Marvel gang).....its not like we are losing Jaws or Star Wars or The Godfather. Or "Psycho" for that matter. "Special and unique" blockbusters are so rare these days.

At the moment, I am mildly(but not massively) "bugged" that the Sopranos "prequel film" (with James Gandolfini's actual son playing young Tony Soprano, and Vera "Young Mrs. Bates" Farmiga playing that OTHER monster mother -- Young Livia Soprano) is delayed for release.

Meanwhile, Marty Scorsese(who ain't getting any younger and is at age risk for COVID), isn't able yet to film "Killers of the Flower Moon" with Leo and DeNiro yet; when he DOES, its going "straight to Apple Streaming" (where Tom Hanks' new WWII Navy movie has already been moved, right now. Which means a lot of people will NOT see it.)

I flash back to how I saw Wait Until Dark, Jaws, and Psycho(revival), in packed full houses full of screaming viewers after waiting in long lines to get in. Right now, even if American theaters DO put new movies into movie theaters -- either they won't be able to attract such crowds or they won't be able to stage them (seats and rows purposely empty; staggered showings with 1/3 full theaters.)

Its a good time for my big screen TV....and memories of movie-going past.

And this: I may have mentioned this before, but a woman friend commented to me recently how she noticed our movie stars and TV stars have been consigned to "ZOOM rooms" trying to broadcast entertainment or interview content from their "dens." She suggests these celebrities have been "reduced" by these appearances(with no great scripted lines to read and lousy cinematography) and that -- "its demonstrating that we really don't have any compelling need for these people in our lives."

So the movies AND the movie stars may never be the same again.

reply

"Mad King"...LOL
The Trump Codicil to Bates Law: "We all go a little mad sometimes... but some of us are just born that way."

reply

The idiotic and destructive corona virus hysteria in the U.S. is not the doing of our "mad king", and neither are the riots. Both of these panics were created and are sustained by the leftist media, leftist governments of many states and cities, and terrorist organizations like Antifa and BLM.

reply

@liscarkat. 6 months into the pandemic the US is still absorbing a 9/11's worth of Covid-deaths *every 3 days*. That *is* the doing of Trump and his followers (like yourself I gather).

Current projection from U. Washington's Covid Modelling centre is 310K US Covid-deaths by Dec 1 (241K if universal mask-wearing breaks out - ha ha, fat chance with people like Trump & you around). You *could* save 69K+ American lives by Dec 1 by wearing masks but you'd... rather not. What patriots. What a country.

reply

@ecarle Very much on the theme of your title - The Day The Movies Died - Disney's decision two days ago to release its $200 mill. live-action blockbuster remake of Mulan worldwide through its Disney+ service for a premium price - $30 in the US, not determined yet elsewhere but presumably similar - is being greeted with *absolute horror* by exhibitors in places such as NZ where the cinemas are open for business (but starved of new content).

If this model works well for Disney - i.e., no splitting of revenues with exhibitors and revenues counted as both $30 per household + any new subscriptions to Disney+ generated - then we really *may* look back at this point as when cinema as we've known it reached its end-game. Gulp.

reply

@ecarle Very much on the theme of your title - The Day The Movies Died - Disney's decision two days ago to release its $200 mill. live-action blockbuster remake of Mulan worldwide through its Disney+ service for a premium price - $30 in the US, not determined yet elsewhere but presumably similar - is being greeted with *absolute horror* by exhibitors in places such as NZ where the cinemas are open for business (but starved of new content).

--

That IS bad when , in New Zealand, the theaters are open and ready for business...currently showing recent hits(I expect that the little bitty Invisible Man has made a billion by now) and "old" ones (Back to the Future, Grease, Jaws.)

---

If this model works well for Disney - i.e., no splitting of revenues with exhibitors and revenues counted as both $30 per household + any new subscriptions to Disney+ generated - then we really *may* look back at this point as when cinema as we've known it reached its end-game. Gulp.

---

I have a few comments here.

One is that, though I've read articles for decades now about "the movies going away," they've always survived. Just in different forms. Right now, we are in an era where they hit movie theaters first(usually) and then you wait on that "window" before they come to TV...cable, streaming, VOD, etc.

What we COULD lose is: the movie theater part of the chain. ONLY movies at home, on TV.

THAT one was predicted in the 70's , but the funny idea then was that ONLY network broadcast TV(generally pretty lousy) would survive, and movies would go away. Didn't happen -- and TV became GREAT(on cable, on streaming -- where the good writers when to thrive.)

I return here to my original contention: perhaps Hollywood just "takes the year off" for theatrical distribution of movies in 2020. Save them all for 2021 ...or even 2022. Then HOPE that audiences will return (gotta give those theaters loans in the meantime...)


reply

There is evidence that everybody WANTS to leave their homes. Where I live, people are eating OUTISDE, but they are seated at tables, and there are a lot of people. Everybody's out walking. And I went to the beach a few weeks ago and there were crowds -- socially distanced on beach at and sea -- but crowds.

Maybe "we are all smokers now" -- aware of the dangers, but inviting death anyway.

ANYWAY...will people flock to indoor movie theaters when "new blockbusters" arrive in 2020, 2021, or 2022? We shall see.

But also this: those memories of everybody screaming at Psycho, Wait Until Dark and Jaws(and let's throw in the lowbrow Friday the 13th, which I saw that way and which proved "you don't have to make a masterpiece to make people scream)...they're largely over. As David Thomson wrote, "we are a different species" since Psycho so shocked the world. Audiences have seen it all. They're not screaming. Jumping sometimes, maybe but not screaming -- that era is over.

reply

That IS bad when , in New Zealand, the theaters are open and ready for business...
Oops...spoke too soon. There's been a new outbreak/cluster of so-far-unsourced/pure community transmissions in NZ, so cinemas, sports/social events, gyms, restaurants, bars, everything non-essential really, are cancelled/closed again here (esp. in Auckland where I live). What a pain. 2020 man.

reply

That IS bad when , in New Zealand, the theaters are open and ready for business...
Oops...spoke too soon. There's been a new outbreak/cluster of so-far-unsourced/pure community transmissions in NZ, so cinemas, sports/social events, gyms, restaurants, bars, everything non-essential really, are cancelled/closed again here (esp. in Auckland where I live). What a pain. 2020 man

---

Sorry about that, swanstep. This herky/jerky "open/close" business has messed with folks.

I did read an article this week about the next Jurassic World sequel going into production "with a 107-page handbook" of COVID-19 safety measures for cast and crew -- including testing, food handling, and "closed set" conditions. They are filming at Pinewood in England(home of "Frenzy") because California still can't accommodate production.

A thought about those "closed set" conditions. The article notes that closed sets are usually used for scenes of intimacy -- that would be scenes with sex and nudity. But methinks those scenes are headed for the trash heap.

For all of my personal interest in "more loving sex and less gory violence" in movies, we are reminded that to film even simulated sex scenes with nudity, the actor and actress involved (in straight scenes) must both be on board. And evidently its going to be harder to get that consent in these "metoo" times. The scenes AS scenes skirt metoo problems.)

So...its back to Jack Nicholson's point: "Show a naked breast, get censored. Cut off a breast..its OK."

--

Meanwhile the question remains begged: when can movie theaters open again with new product...and who will go?

reply

There's a piece in the NY Times today called ''The Week Old Hollywood Finally, Actuallly Died' about the impact of streaming services on studios right now:

The Week Old Hollywood Finally, Actually Died
The streaming services are in charge, and bringing a ruthless new culture with them.

By Ben Smith
Aug. 16, 2020
Updated 8:43 p.m. ET

For decades, the best thing about being a Hollywood executive, really, was how you got fired. Studio executives would be gradually, gently, even lovingly, nudged aside, given months to shape their own narratives and find new work, or even promoted. When Amy Pascal was pushed out of Sony Pictures in 2015, she got an exit package and production deal worth a reported $40 million.

That, of course, was before streaming services arrived, upending everything with a ruthless logic and coldhearted efficiency.

That was never more clear than on Aug. 7, when WarnerMedia abruptly eliminated the jobs of hundreds of employees, emptying the executive suite at the once-great studio that built Hollywood, and is now the subsidiary of AT&T. In a series of brisk video calls, executives who imagined they were studio eminences were reminded that they work — or used to work — at the video division of a phone company. The chairman of WarnerMedia Entertainment, Bob Greenblatt, learned that he’d been fired the morning of the day the news broke, two people he spoke to told me. Jeffrey Schlesinger, a 37-year company veteran (cont.)

reply

who ran the lucrative international licensing business, complained to friends that he had less than an hour’s notice, two other people told me.

“We’re in the brutal final scenes of Hollywood as people here knew it, as streaming investment and infrastructure take precedence,” said Janice Min, the former Hollywood Reporter co-president who did a brief stretch as an executive at the streaming platform Quibi. “Politesse and production deal kiss-offs for those at the top, and, more importantly, the financial fire hose to float a bureaucracy, seem to be disappearing. It’s like a club, already shut down by the pandemic, running out of dues to feed all its members.”
The drama at Warner marked a turning point, in part because of its huge size and the high profile of the iconic companies under its umbrella: Warner Brothers, HBO and CNN among them. And it comes as Hollywood power is conspicuously absent from the national conversation. Washington is consumed by TikTok, the Chinese-owned video-sharing app that’s the most successful new content platform in the world. TikTok has succeeded as Quibi — Hollywood’s premium alternative to user-generated content — struggles to find an audience. The California politician just nominated for the vice presidency comes from San Francisco, and doesn’t particularly advertise her Hollywood ties (though she was all over Hollywood insiders’ Instagram last week).

The corporate shifts at WarnerMedia and NBCUniversal in recent days signal that the technological shift you’ve been reading about for years is finally taking concrete form, accelerated by the pandemic. The new leaders of the industry want to talk about digital products and subscription marketing. The most interesting profiles of entertainment executives are, literally, obituaries, notably the catalog of victories and vices that marked the career of Viacom’s founder, Sumner Redstone. (cont.)

reply

(Like much of his industry, Mr. Redstone, who died last week at age 97, held on far longer than anyone expected. Former Viacom employees recalled that it had been more than six years since, the then- chief executive, Philippe Dauman, asked his aides to draft a stirring eulogy for Mr. Redstone, who was 90 at the time, and to create a website in his memory. But Mr. Dauman was fired four years ago, there are no plans for him to deliver a eulogy and the website remains on some forgotten digital shelf.)

Much of what’s happening now in Hollywood, too, has that feeling of a death so long anticipated that you half assumed you’d just missed the funeral. At WarnerMedia, the executives’ firings came after the company badly botched the introduction of a streaming service whose name — HBO Go, HBO Now, or HBO Max — nobody could figure out. The service has primarily distinguished itself so far by its energetic and unsuccessful attempts to spin about 4 million people who have actually used the service into a number north of 30 million.

“It’s the great reckoning,” another top executive who was abruptly forced out, Kevin Reilly, told The Hollywood Reporter.
That reckoning is mostly driven by the unglamorous economics of streaming, though it also overlaps with this year’s better-known reckoning, over race and gender. Studio executives have been mortified by the “About Us” pages with profiles of their leaders — pages that are full of white faces as the push for representation adds new pressure for change.

But the underlying rationale is economic, and obvious. “The golden rivers of money from cable TV are drying up. With the only growth business for most of the companies coming from streaming, which isn’t a profit maker yet, the companies have no alternative than to cut costs,” The Information wrote. (News of Warner’s planned layoffs leaked to that Silicon Valley-based business publication, not the usual Hollywood trades, adding insult to injury.)

reply

The new leaders in the industry do not come out of old Hollywood, which has seen its clubbiness and values fall into disrepute. The new WarnerMedia chief executive, Jason Kilar, spent the formative years of his career as the senior vice president of worldwide application software at Amazon, known for its grim corporate culture. He ran Hulu, then left it after clashing with the its legacy media owners. At WarnerMedia he promoted an executive who hadn’t made her career inside the Hollywood club, Ann Sarnoff, to head his content division.

Many of the new leaders are admirers of the culture at Netflix, which is hardheaded and unsentimental: Executives eat in the cafeteria and have a corporate philosophy that holds, in an admired slide presentation, that employees are like athletes. Managers should always be looking to trade up, and fire even high performers if a better player comes along. (The well-regarded human resources executive who developed the presentation with the company’s chief executive, Reed Hastings, was, herself, eventually fired.)
WarnerMedia’s Mr. Kilar told me in an email that his cuts and reorganizations were aimed at pushing company “from a wholesaling mind set to a retailing mind set” — that is, from the old studio hitmakers’ handshake deals with distributors to a techie’s focus on user-friendly streaming interfaces and subscriber retention.
That’s an unromantic vision that still rankles many in the industry.

“This is the difference between people who got into the movie business and people who are in the content business,” said Terry Press, the former president of CBS films, whose division was eliminated in a merger with Viacom earlier this year.

reply

The industry’s cultural shift is also wiping out fiefdoms. A day before the WarnerMedia firings, NBCUniversal forced out the embattled chairman of its entertainment division — a storied role held in the past by, among others, Mr. Greenblatt — and announced it wouldn’t replace him. Instead it’s shearing off executive roles and merging most of what were once separate operations across channels as varied as Syfy and NBC. Similarly, WarnerMedia combined its crown jewel, HBO, and the workaday cable channels TBS and TNT and the struggling new streaming service.

The companies deny that the organizational changes will affect what you see. (“The brands will maintain their distinctiveness, and there won’t be visible differences to the viewer,” an NBC official said.) But that’s not how it usually plays out in declining industries. The moves echo those taken by long-declining publishing industry institutions like the magazine company Condé Nast, which has gradually combined the roles of executives at magazines like Vogue and Vanity Fair, all the while insisting that they weren’t diminishing the inevitably diminished brands.

And at WarnerMedia, the challenge is particularly existential. We won’t know for a couple of years whether this month’s layoffs signaled a successful shift, as Mr. Kilar and AT&T’s chief executive, John Stankey, intend, or whether they were simply a clumsy attempt to mask the company’s remarkable failure in the streaming world. HBO Max has barely been able to compete with Netflix and Disney, despite having a service full of beloved shows and movies, from the best of Alfred Hitchcock to HBO’s long hot streak that includes, this summer, the releases of “Lovecraft Country” and “I May Destroy You."

reply

With the purge of top creative executives completed, the responsibility for what’s inside HBO Max and the cable TV channels will fall largely on Casey Bloys, an HBO veteran who is now overseeing all of WarnerMedia’s entertainment content. He has, he said in a telephone interview, told his new team that he wants programming on the streaming service that will complement the buzzy, complex adult shows like “Watchmen” and “Succession” that HBO is best known for. He is pointed to straightforwardly fun titles that appeal to younger audiences like “Green Lantern” and “Gossip Girl" as models for broadening out the service. His success will depend, in part, on the company’s ability to clearly market its streaming service and perhaps more on whether AT&T is really willing to keep spending on TV like Netflix and Disney.
Mr. Bloys is a great programmer, not a power player or politician of the old model. Indeed, the studio bosses seem to have lost their central place in the American power structure and become simply the well-compensated employees of ordinary companies, with ordinary attention to the bottom line. There is one exception, Disney, which also proves the rule: Bob Iger’s Disney+ started just in time to catch the streaming wave and provide a business that met the coronavirus moment.

“Disney will remain relevant into the future,” said Barry Diller, who once headed Paramount and Fox and is now chief executive of the digital media company IAC. “All of the rest of them are caddies on a golf course they’ll never play.”

reply

The corporate shifts at WarnerMedia and NBCUniversal in recent days signal that the technological shift you’ve been reading about for years is finally taking concrete form, accelerated by the pandemic.

---
Many of the new leaders are admirers of the culture at Netflix, which is hardheaded and unsentimental: Executives eat in the cafeteria and have a corporate philosophy that holds, in an admired slide presentation, that employees are like athletes. Managers should always be looking to trade up, and fire even high performers if a better player comes along.


---

That was never more clear than on Aug. 7, when WarnerMedia abruptly eliminated the jobs of hundreds of employees, emptying the executive suite at the once-great studio that built Hollywood, and is now the subsidiary of AT&T. In a series of brisk video calls, executives who imagined they were studio eminences were reminded that they work — or used to work — at the video division of a phone company

--

“Disney will remain relevant into the future,” said Barry Diller, who once headed Paramount and Fox and is now chief executive of the digital media company IAC. “All of the rest of them are caddies on a golf course they’ll never play.”

ABOVE

Four quotes from that very interesting article. Thank you swanstep. I think the quotes help illustrate exactly HOW the movies are about to change in a big way. And lurking behind them is this first point: this awful, horrible, life-changing pandemic -- proved a big business opportunity for any number of corporate entitites, even as other businesses are going bankrupt. (CONT)

reply

CONT

I mean, if my OP comment is that 2020 could be the year that "the movies died," after some thought my new thought is: the year the movies died FOR A YEAR. Maybe two. Not many movies in theaters. No crowded theaters with audiences to enjoy the movies. Possibly no Oscars(or an Oscars that will be tainted by too small a nominee pool.)

And it is up to the movie theaters to survive long enough for the movies to come back.

BUT this article makes the point that to be following the movie theaters is perhaps to be following the wrong "lead." Streaming is already here. Many movie stars are getting their biggest paydays ever to appear in Netflix movies and Amazon prime series and (now) Apple TV movies.

Not to mention the all-powerful Disney(how a name once affiliated with childhood wonder morphed into a Darth Vader-like symbol of corporate omnipresence is "one for the ages.")

The article makes the point that in Hollywood itself, the "death of movies" is actually the death of movie JOBS. All those firings. It pretty much leaves the stars, the directors, and the creative talent about all that's left. Which might be a good thing. What did all those fired people DO? They were "the suits," I guess. Sad for them but -- as the article also makes clear -- the corporate philosophies of Silicon Valley(which are basically what Netflix and Amazon and certainly Apple ARE) , are ruthless.


reply

I took note that HBO Max is promoting among other things that you can find "the best of Hitchcock" there. Cool. He hangs on into the 21st Century as quality product from the mid-20th Century(in the main.)

And floating among the myriad cable series now on streaming, I pretty much see the thumbnail for "Bates Motel" on my streaming screen every time I turn on the TV. And Turner Classic Movies often uses "Cary running from the crop duster" practically as a logo -- whether the film clip or a logo.

In short, there's been a little room for the Heart and Soul of Hitchcock even among the open fire hose gout of "content" on streaming (a lot of which, the thumbnails prove, are "movies" that never got released anywhere else, cheaply made from worthless scripts, with stars like Willis and Travolta making big bucks to be in sometimes, but othertimes "starring" nobodies.)

I return to this irony: some big name stars are getting paid HUGE money to do "Netflix" movies that never get to theaters at all(only some, like The Irishman, merit that honor.) And maybe these movies are seen, but maybe they aren't and it becomes ironic: these stars aren't being paid to be in movies and to entertain the masses -- they are being paid to provide "content to streaming." They aren't leaving a legacy.

Tom Hanks's self-written movie about a WWII Navy commander got trailers back in early 2020 and I thought "well, it doesn't look that good, but its Tom Hanks hanging in there, maybe I'll see it". Now its only on Apple and doesn't get talked about or written about or thought about. But Hanks got a huge extra payday from the sale.

reply

Meanwhile, despite my belief that maybe we'd all be better off if the studios released nothing more to theaters in 2020....it looks like they are going to try.

I saw a TV commercial for Nolan's "Tenet" the other day, and at the end, it said:

Only In Theaters
Where Theaters Are Open

...which seemed self-defeating as "ballyhoo."

A neglible Russell Crowe movie where he plays a Road Rage psycho called "Unhinged" is being released to SOME theaters, and I saw this review: "Unhinged Isn't Worth Getting COVID-19 Over." Ouch. Obviously no critical support for going to the theater for THAT one.

And yet: actual trailers are appearing for new FALL movies like "Death on the Nile"(milking Gal Gadot as a villainess of sorts; the 1978 cast can't be beat though, anymore than the 1974 cast of Murder on the Orient Express could.) One watches the trailer, feels the "excitement of the new" and wonders -- will that movie REALLY be released in October, and if so, where? (Irony: in the US , the movie theaters are mainly closed in the big states of California and New York -- the New York governor called movie theaters "not essential." Well, they sure USED to be. Like in the Depression.)

--

I dunno. There is a "mix and match" thing going on here, I think. Streaming was going to reconfigure the movie business to our wide screen TVs even without the pandemic; the pandemic allowed it to flourish.

And even as I, for one, hope for a "normal flow of movies" to return to theaters, what we are really talking about is the MAGIC of movies to really affect our lives and live in our memories. Will there ever be a Psycho or a Godfather or an Exorcist or a Jaws or a Star Wars(that isn't CALLED Star Wars) again?

Remains to be seen.

reply

Update: trailers are starting to appear on the internet, as if Hollywood were trying to WILL a movie season back into existence.

For instance, Wonder Woman II -- now scheduled for October -- has been given its second trailer(after only the first was out there for months) and we finally get to see Kirsten Wiig in all her reconstituted glory as villain "Cheetah" (looks like CGI to me.) This is the kind of trailer meant to get people into the theater; its "full court press." (And note that Gal Gadot in "Death on the Nile" will now be released in October as well -' I'll bet that the pre-Covid plan was for Gadot in Wonder Woman in the summer and Nile in the fall; now they'll hit close together.)

I was also intrigued to see a "teaser trailer" for the newest attempt to reboot Batman == "THE Batman"(makes a big difference) and they seem to have filmed enough FOR a trailer. Question: has production re-started or is that footage that was shot before the March shutdown?

I have no "read" on the strategy here, but I am guessing that Hollywood wants to start "pushing a movie season, ready or not." In the US, I guess many movie theaters (not in California or NYC ) WILL open, with restrictions, and if that can get some dollars in, Hollywood will take it.

Meanwhile, the article about Jurassic World going into production suggests that "COVID safe" filming procedures are in place.

I think maybe Hollywood is going to "push the envelope" on getting back in business.

I also think that perhaps Hollywood is looking to get past the US election to get even more back in business.

It will be interesting to see.

I guess I'll have my own decision to make about going back to the theaters. I don't think they care if I come back to movie theaters -- or want me there. "At risk" age and all...these movies will be targeting a more youthful demographic.

reply