Psycho In "4-D"


At least I think it is called 4-D.

Whatever this process is, it comes with various new TVs and it is sort of "super HD" which converts motion pictures into...video taped TV shows. Imagine Psycho looking like a TV soap opera, ala "General Hospital" or "Days of Our Lives."

I witnessed 4-D at other people's homes in the past couple of years and I found it just horrible to watch -- at least with movies. I suppose if 4-D can make a football game or a basketball game or a baseball game seem even MORE real("Hey, its like I'm right there!") that's fine, these are live events that often play on tape anyway.

But a MOVIE? To see the work of nuanced cinematographers with their command of light, smoke and shadow reduced to ...a cheap looking video production. Well, its awful.

Still, since I bought a new TV, I've tortured myself with this 4-D for a few days now, given that I bought a TV that REFUSES to show any movie any other way. (Oh, I know there's a film on YouTube with Tom Cruise telling you how to turn 4-D off, but....I had to experiment for awhile.)

To experiment, I've watched most of Psycho, The Godfather, The Sting, and a particularly well photographed favorite Western of mine ("The Professionals") in 4-D and beheld as these fine works turned into things that looked like they were filmed for 24 dollars and 19 cents.

I found that exactly what it feels like we are seeing differs as you watch it: (1) a soap opera on video tape or (2) we are "on the set" watching the actors work, and it looks like nothing but fake acting(without "distancing" cinematography, it feels like we are watching a rehearsal. ) (3) "You are really there, this is really happening." With Psycho, I looked at the Arbogast murder and when he first enters the foyer it didn't feel like a movie at all - it felt like we were accompanying a man into a REAL foyer. (4) 3-D -- you ever wonder what Psycho would look like in 3-D? Watch it in 4-D..Arbogast's process fall puts his body WAY out in front of the process screen.

And this: I watched a scene from "The Professionals" where Lee Marvin and Burt Lancaster were walking and talking with the desert hills behind them and a clear blue sky and not only did it feel like we were "really there" -- the men seemed incredibly REAL and as if they were alive NOW (this movie came out in 1966, and both actors have been dead for decades.")

There is something about these "4-D" movies that seems like a sacrilege -- like that colorization fad of the 80's with b/w movies which almost reached Psycho but stopped in time. You can bet that Hitchcock never wanted Psycho to look and play like THIS. And yet...it does.

Other observations:

The "video tape effect" becomes most apparent when either the character moves or the camera moves. In Psycho, when Janet Leigh's head is still as she drives her car, it ALMOST looks like the good old movie we all know and love. But when she moves around the real estate office...video. As for the camera moves, in Psycho, Hitchcock's many sinuous camera moves have a jerky, sudden feel to them in 4-D, as if an amateur was manning the camera.

Modern films have "FULL" 4-D effects -- I guess they were shot on digital to begin with. A movie like Psycho has been "modified digitally" to create the 4-D effect. And yet, on the Psycho DVD, when I ran the old 1960 trailer(Hitchcock as tour guide) and the 1960 promotional film showing people lining up for Psycho in NYC....mercifully, the 4-D effect could not take hold. Well, there was a BIT of the 4-D effect in the trailer, as Hitchcock stood in front of the Psycho house to talk to us, its as if the shot of the house was on a screen behind him and he was a "pop up" figure in front of it.

A friend told me this week, "Even when you turn off the 4-D , it doesn't entirely go away" and so I'm in a quandry. Do I go find an "old" TV to buy? I want my movies back! I did find that watching the TV image through slightly dirty reading eyeglasses defeated the "video" effect somewhat. Is THAT how I must view movies on TV going forward?

Oh, well. The future is here. Whether we want it or not.

And I guess I'd kinda like to see what NXNW and The Birds look like as video-taped TV live dramas...





reply

Do I go find an "old" TV to buy? I want my movies back!

The situation's evolving but it's becoming a point of difference among TV-manufacturers how much care they take to preserve the look and feel of stuff shot on film at 24 fps. A standardized, complete switch-off of software-augmentation setting called 'Filmmaker Mode' is offered on a lot of new TVs for 2020:
https://www.vulture.com/2020/01/filmmaker-mode-motion-smoothing-tv.html
https://www.trustedreviews.com/news/filmmaker-mode-tv-3970954
It's certainly infuriating that at least some previous 'switch off motion-smoothing' settings *didn't* also turn off lots of other processing gimmickry, e.g., for contrast & color. Anyhow, the new certification standard *should* completely solve the problem, but we'll see.




reply

Great technical info and with a few article readings I think I am prepared to make the right fix to the TV. I guess it is called 4-K, not 4-D, which seems confusing to me (in comparison to HD as well, not to mention Blu-Ray -- anybody want to pick a format and stick with it?)

I also have the "save" of another, smaller TV in the house on which I can watch my beloved DVDs but...I bought the new one to do that in my favorite room, y'know?

"Lemons into lemonade" I've sort of been running a "4-K festival" to see what favorite movies look like as "soap operas" and to check the effect of 4-K on different movies. Some interesting results:

North by Northwest survived in many scenes, looking like a regular movie. Too old to mess with, I guess. Rather like the outdoor scenes in The Professionals, the outdoor crop duster sequence looked like "you are there." And though the Rushmore climax looked more like "actors in a big room against big paintings," somehow most of it held together as visually great as ever.

The effects sequences in The Birds seemed unaffected by the effect. Though this was weird: the kids running down the hill from the schoolhouse looked like "soap opera reality" with Unreality of the birds behind and above them.

The gritty and realistic Frenzy transferred to almost a "pure" soap opera, real look. Two disturbing outcomes: (1) the central rape-murder scene, already uncomfortably intimate, in "soap opera mode" become even more sickeningly "real." (2) When Rusk entered his flat after the Babs potato sack dumping, it looked very much like a real room with a real man in it, not a "character"(corollary: Arbogast entering the foyer in 4-K in Psycho.)

And: both The Godfather and The Sting, through sheer narrative drive and great acting, eventually overcame the effect, in my mind at least. I thought: "If I never could fix this, I guess eventually I would just get used to it." But not liking it!

Here's to a possible fix, soon.

reply

And this: this 4-K problem demonstrates how TV technology makers evidently thought first and foremost of sporting events before giving consideration to classic film. Makes a film buff feel like a second class citizen!

reply

....all fixed now. And(on topic), I used Psycho as the "control film" to check things out. It plays like a movie again. (I'll probably try OAITH next to get a "modern film" back to normal. But wait -- QT still shoots on film? I should see how a modern movie shot on digital plays?)

I suppose with the terror/anger gone, I can say that it WAS kind of interesting to see these movies changed to "live versions." One got a greater sense of the work involved in making a movie -- the way the actors and the director and the cinematographer have to "fight reality" to make a fictional story play as "real." Irony: to do this, they have to TAKE AWAY the reality that the "soap opera version" gives you.

reply