MovieChat Forums > Psycho (1960) Discussion > OT: Bad Times at the El Royale (NO SPOI...

OT: Bad Times at the El Royale (NO SPOILERS)


I went out to see this movie, which I suppose is better recommended as a rental (and how is that term used nowadays? Its not a rental tape, it might be a Redbox DVD, but not a Blockbuster DVD -- you can order from your cable company or off streaming.) But I read that the movie was long and my personal rule is: go to the theater where you can concentrate on the movie AND.. "go out to the movies" once in a while. A fine habit for decades now.

"Bad Times at the El Royale" is a rare bird: NOT a remake or a sequel or a superhero movie, rather the kind of movie that the studios put out in the fall. This one opened with the full "20th Century Fox" logo and fanfare -- its not a "Fox Searchlight" indie; its got some money behind it, principally demonstrated by a cast with some names in it and very plush production values. I expect it will make some money in theater -- not a lot -- and then roam the cable dial for years as a good movie to watch on a Saturday night.

No movie is TOTALLY original, and this one borrows from Agatha Christie and The Hateful Eight: 7 disparate characters arrive at the same isolated rundown Lake Tahoe hotel-ish motel(its too big for a motel, too small for a hotel)....and they all have secrets. Some have secret identities, some have secret missions.

You got: Jeff Bridges (as a priest.) As our Nicholsons, Connerys, Hackmans and Redfords leave the stage...Mr. Bridges moves into "senior national treasure status" and I watched him with pleasure. I've grown up with him.

You got: Jon Hamm(as a vacuum cleaner salesman with a rich Southern accent.) Bridges and Hamm are the first clues that this will be a good movie -- they are pretty careful about the scripts they choose. In Hamm's case, his distinctively funny yet menacing salesman pretty much dominates the expository dialogue that sets up the movie -- he owns the movie for awhile until the other characters "jell."

You got: Dakota Johnson, as a mysterious woman who signs "F U" into the hotel register. She's trying to move on from the "Fifty Shades" series, yet she now trails the sexuality of that film. Her clothes stay on in this film, but tightly on a nice body, and she's just plain sexy(its that waif-like, girl next door face that does it). Yet haunted. And troubled. And dangerous. (A reminder: she is the daughter of Don Johnson, whom she facially resembles, and Melanie Griffith, whom she does not ; and she is the granddaughter of Tippi Hedren, who is very much alive and in Dakota's life.)

You got: Chris Hemsworth(as Charles Manson, pretty much -- this is the first of several movies out to undercut QT's Manson movie.) Lest I seem too sexist about Dakota Johnson in this film, let it be known that Mr. Hemsworth plays his role mainly with his shirt off(or fully open) to reveal his six pack and Thor-sculpted body at all times(if Manson had looked THIS good, he would have had 1000's of followers.) I did like that, in one shared shot, Jeff Bridges (who once upon a time was as young and sculpted as Hemsworth, in Thunderbolt and Lightfoot and in Cutter and bone, for two) is now "the old guy" standing next to himself of 4 decades ago. The baton is passed. And Old Jeff Bridges is still a cool guy.

You got: Nick Offerman...the amusing self-parodying "middle aged macho man"(with big moustache sometimes, big beard others) from Parks and Recreation and marriage to that Will and Grace lady. Offerman is a "name" now, but the irony in this movie is that in his two scenes, you can't really see him: he is filmed in continuous long shot at a distance in one scene, and wearing a mask in the other. But that's him, and he's a name.

Those are the "names" in El Royale, but two other lesser known actors anchor it, too:

You got: Cynthia Erivo. An African-American actress who proves the true lead of the picture -- all the "names" are pretty much supporting HER. And, in an art film touch, Erivo, playing a wannabee Motown-Diana Ross lounge singer, is allowed to sing, one, two, THREE songs all the way through, acapella, at different junctures in the picture.

And you got: Lewis Pullman, as the spindly, scaredy-cat sole employee of the El Royale, in bellman's uniform but also desk clerk, bartender, and housekeeping.

With its "motel in the middle of nowhere" setting, and its weird sole proprietor (who, yes, can peep in the rooms); El Royale has some Psycho/Shining lineage, and given that we're in Lake Tahoe, some Rat Pack nostalgia. The fictional El Royale is a hotel which sits on the California/Nevada state line, which runs through the hotel (you can only gamble on the Nevada side) , the room wings, the parking lot. This is based on a REAL, now closed hotel called the "Cal-Neva Lodge," where I once stayed with my family in 1969 and where I swam from "Nevada to California" by simply swimming the length of the pool.

Funny thing: Bad Times at the El Royale is set in 1969, too. So...such nostalgia.





reply

I'm not out to spoil this thing, but it is certainly a stylistic piece, and it opens with a nifty "ten years ago" starter scene with Nick Offerman(always in the same wide screen shot and at such a distance you can hardly make out his face.) He enters his motel room, and -- in a series of cinematic "jump cuts" -- manages to move a bed, tear up a carpet, rip up some floorboards, "bury" a satchel, restore everything to order and....well, soon, its ten years later and the guest start arriving at the El Royale. What's buried under the floorboards is McGuffin enough to get the ball rolling.

The film has nostalgia elements(footage of a President Richard Nixon press conference -- and boy was he more articulate on the cuff than our current one); Rat Pack elements AND Manson elements(funny how different those decade-apart eras were), a fair amount of mystery, a lot of blood(its one of THOSE kind of thrillers), the loss of a few of those "name" actors along the way(Ten Little Indians, sort of), red herrings and final payoffs.

And a whole lotta allegory, as the El Royale starts to fill in as a kind of "purgatory for the redemption of lost souls." That's OK by me...a thriller with a bit more on its mind is a good thing.

I'd say that's about it, but I must re-iterate that a key part of the enjoyment of movies is -- watching movie stars. I can't say that any of the stars in El Royale are really "big" (save Jeff Bridges from sheer longevity) but they are all interesting to watch. I considered how each of the "names" earned their way onto this marquee: the Oscar-winning Bridges through 50 years of acting; Jon Hamm through the high class "Mad Men,"; Dakota Johnson through the high-sex "Fifty Shades," Chris Hemsworth through Marvel(could HE be the breakthrough "stand alone star" generated by those epics?) ; even Nick Offerman from his TV work and some movie support. All enjoyable to watch.

reply

But the writer-director clearly wants to single out Cynthia Erivo as the star aborning, and she's very good, and she sings well(to me; though part of the storyline are flashbacks to "a recording studio expert" criticizing her talent while sexually harassing her.) I'm going to look up her other work, I'm going to look out for her future work.

And oh...that sole employee bellman -- though not played by a " name" -- proves quite important to the tale, too.

Recommended. Maybe as a rental...

reply

Probably as a rental.

It looks like this movie had an opening weekend US gross of ....$3 million. Versus Halloween at $77 million.

Oh, well, Hitchcock could have told us that a good slasher movie can outgross a bunch of movie stars in a mere "story."

Too bad: Bridges and Hamm and Johnson and Hemsworth....no box office clout here.

reply

Interesting that Halloween has hit so big, and it's a bit depressing really that the whole idea of star currency is so degraded that not even actors as hot as Johnson and Hemsworth can pull an audience beyond their series-character roles.

Hemsworth was good as a sexy 1970s race-car driver in Ron Howard's best movie for a long time, Rush a few years ago. Very few people in the US saw it - weird. He was in a good, ultra-meta horror film, Cabin In The Woods a about a decade ago (pre-Thor?). It's worth seeing - Hemsworth's role is too small to be decisive but he works, and it's a near-genre-classic for his resume.

Hemsworth, I've decided reminds me of Burt Reynolds (before his darkess emerged): he's this big beefcake stud but wears it lightly and with good comic timing (every 'Rocket Racoon is a Rabbit' line in Avengers landed). It makes him flat-out adorable as Thor. Likewise, Young Burt would have killed in one of these lead Marvel roles if they'd been around.

Bad Times in El Royale; shades of Bad Day At Black Rock at all?

reply