MovieChat Forums > Psycho (1960) Discussion > OT: A New Article on Rear Window and "T...

OT: A New Article on Rear Window and "The Amazing Creation of Lars Thorwald"


Big, hulking, white haired Lars Thorwald is another one of Hitchcock's lead-ups to Norman Bates -- both men have sympathy to go with their terrifying sides, and both men like bladed carving instruments.

I can't get the link, but a writer on film named Kim Morgan has put out an article on Rear Window this week(as liner notes for a screening) and though it covers other bases, the focus on Thorwald -- in his blue suit and blue eyes -- is quite good.

You should be able to find it...

reply

Sounds great, EC. Now imagine if someone made a movie, --in the 21st century!--that was basically the back story of Lars Thorwald; how he got that way; his childhood, upbringing,--Glens Falls or Erie, Pennsylvania?--the mind boggles. His service in the war. The GI Bill was available to him but he didn't use it. Why? He wasn't always heavy, yet he let himself get that way at a young age. In his youth, as a teenager, he seemed to have a bright future, played sports, had friends. Now look at him, at forty, prematurely aged, with a nagging wife. His life has turned to ashes. This new woman he met was a way out. He had no illusions about the romantic part, but the freedom,--that's the ticket!--sooner or later he'll be making some serious career changes. Thorwald isn't a criminal by nature. He only wants to make one kill, break loose, turn over a new leaf. For the rest of his life he'll be an honest man; and a good citizen, too. Lars is a man with ideas. After a decade of making mistakes, ever since leaving the army, he'd made a series of decisions that were basically one mistake after another. In time, with that shrew of a wife, it became a habit for him. Now he's going to break that habit. He's learned from his mistakes. Middle aged he may be on the outside, he's a young man at heart, and now, a free man, he's going to show the world what Lars Thorwald is really made of...


whaddaya think?

reply


Whaddaya think?

---

I think your backgrounder is great stuff, telegonus.

I've often had a fascination with the "imaginary backgrounds" of key movie characters. People will sometimes say "why would anyone waste time on thinking about the past of people who didn't exist to begin with," and I always say that the greatest movies, with the best characters COMPEL us to want to know more about them.

You know, one of the reasons the infamous shrink scene so hated by others still fascinates me in Psycho is because -- we WANT to know more about Norman Bates, "and how he came to be that way." We learn about his young life with his mother, the death of his father, the coming of the boyfriend -- the faked murder suicide, the years between there and now and how Norman would "walk about the house dressed as her, speak in her voice", etc. And the killing of the earlier two women(which we start to try to imagine: TWO other shower murders? Or somewhere else?) We come to realize that the horrors we have witnessed (the killings of Marion and Arbogast) are just the "tip of the iceberg" of the history of depravity .
with Norman Bates at the Bates Motel.

Janet Leigh said that she conjured up and wrote down for herself an entire back story for Marion Crane, including the high school years, and determined what perfume she liked, what clothes she liked, etc.

And ME...well I just had to think about Arbogast's back story. He calls himself only by his last name, and calls Sam, "Loomis." Military background, probably WWII, maybe some Korea. And I figure he's a New York transplant to Phoenix Arizona, likely with a taste for the gambling of nearby Las Vegas and probably a mature, sexy girlfriend he takes there.


reply

But back to Lars Thorwald and YOUR take on him. He's almost as mysterious and inscrutable a character as Norman Bates, and -- like Norman -- he seems to make us feel weird sympathy for his downtrodden state well before he goes "full sympathetic" when confronting Jeff. Thorwald seems burdened by life -- henpecked, trapped with an invalid wife who may not BE invalid, carrying that big heavy suitcase full of costume jewelry every day...

We want to know more about Lars. And you've given it to us:

reply

Now imagine if someone made a movie, --in the 21st century!--that was basically the back story of Lars Thorwald; how he got that way; his childhood, upbringing,--Glens Falls or Erie, Pennsylvania?--the mind boggles.

---

The realization that everyone was a child first is always a bit fascinating. There's usually an innocence there that will be slowly -- or quickly in military service -- taken away.

---

His service in the war. The GI Bill was available to him but he didn't use it. Why? He wasn't always heavy, yet he let himself get that way at a young age. In his youth, as a teenager, he seemed to have a bright future, played sports, had friends. Now look at him, at forty, prematurely aged, with a nagging wife. His life has turned to ashes.

---

It happens. The weight gain seems to have made him ungainly. Heavy of body, heavy of spirit. There is a pathos there.

And yet Hitchcock plays fair about Thorwald's dark side(just as he would with Norman going angry in the parlor scene.)

He proves surprisingly grouchy to the "art woman" in the courtyard: "Why don't you just shut up?" Something seems to have doubled up his pathos with a certain meanness -- the kind of meanness that allows a man to consider murder as his way out, and to murder a little dog as insurance if need be.

---

This new woman he met was a way out. He had no illusions about the romantic part, but the freedom,--that's the ticket!--sooner or later he'll be making some serious career changes.

---

That Thorwald could GET a girlfriend is a reminder than in early 50's America, men had most of the power, and women were drawn to it. Overweight costume jewelry salesman? He's a MAN. Thus a breadwinner catch. With a certain power to him -- those piercing, heavy-lidded blue eyes, for instance. I expect he met the woman in his rounds selling jewelry, maybe gave her some free samples. And he talked her into helping with his plot by "playing" Mrs. Thorwald -- just as Gavin Elster would later talk Judy Barton into becoming Madeleine for awhile.

---

And I suppose Thorwald isn't a criminal by nature. He only wants to make one kill, break loose, turn over a new leaf. For the rest of his life he'll be an honest man; and a good citizen, too.

---

Raymond Burr only said one thing about Thorwald -- years after he played him -- that was the actor's take on the man: "He wasn't a killer by nature."

One kill was likely all that was intended. But to me, its that lengthy dismemberment and carrying away of the body parts that takes Lars down a horrifying level or two. How -- in his stomach -- could he DO that? Its the horrific side of Lars that makes him a forbear of Norman.

---

Lars is a man with ideas. After a decade of making mistakes, ever since leaving the army, he'd made a series of decisions that were basically one mistake after another.

---

Well imagined, telegonus. Lars just sends out that vibe.

---

In time, with that shrew of a wife, it became a habit for him. Now he's going to break that habit. He's learned from his mistakes. Middle aged he may be on the outside, he's a young man at heart, and now, a free man, he's going to show the world what Lars Thorwald is really made of...

---

And it was a good plan, really. "In plain sight of his neighbors" to avoid suspicion, and with curtains drawn to avoid the killing and choppings up being seen. But there's that one guy who invades Thorwald's life, spies and pries and digs right in. We feel the invasion of privacy on Thorwald's part...and the frustration that this last attempt at freedom is going to be screwed up by a total stranger.

reply

I would here like to point out that film critic David Thomson, back in the 80's, I think, wrote a book called "Suspects," which consisted of 30 or so, maybe 40, backstory imaginings about a host of famous movie characters.

Norman Bates got a story. Judy Barton got a story(Gavin Elster first saw her on a surreptitious trip to a San Francisco strip club. On stage.) Jeff Jeffries got a story.

And Lars Thorwald got a story.

I can't remember it now, but I think a fair amount of it tracked with YOUR imaginings, telegonus. Great minds think alike. I do remember the detail of Lars growing up on a dairy farm in Minnesota and dealing with freezing winters and a lot of cow dung -- humiliated him.

Thomson would not only "back story" these characters, he would go PAST the movie they appear in, into the future, sometimes. And thus, Thomson had Jeff Jeffries drive to the prison where Thorwald was on Death Row and try to make peace with the man.

And quite nastily, Thomson decided that Jeff Jeffries, walking but crippled from his two long-ago broken legs, would not be able to run when a Vietnamese woman pointed a gun at him and fired while he was covering THAT war as an older man. The bullet comes right through his camera lens and kills him...

Interestingly, Thomson couldn't write many surprises into his backstory of Norman Bates...it tracks pretty much with what the novel and the movie told us about him. Thomson couldn't beat the shrink scene...

reply

Thanks for the heads up ecarle. Morgan used to run (checking: still runs) a blog called Sunset Gun that I read a lot with both profit and enjoyment at one point. As well as being a smart writer about film, Morgan is quite the looker. She kind of styles herself as a blonde from a '50s Sam Fuller movie and... pulls it off perfectly! I heard (last year?) that she recently married Guy Maddin, the Canadian writer/director of expressionist neo-silents such as The Saddest Music In The World (2003), My Winnipeg (2007), Dracula:Pages from a Virgin's Diary (2002). If I were him, she's going in my movies!

reply

Thanks for the heads up ecarle. Morgan used to run (checking: still runs) a blog called Sunset Gun that I read a lot with both profit and enjoyment at one point.

--

Yes, I read that blog too. But she sometimes goes weeks without new articles on it, so I've taken to googling her "theater notes" on certain films. This Lars Thorwald piece is good, but she's done good recent work on The Thing and some other films, too.

---

As well as being a smart writer about film, Morgan is quite the looker. She kind of styles herself as a blonde from a '50s Sam Fuller movie and... pulls it off perfectly!

---

Yep. The Sunset Gun site is living proof.

---

I heard (last year?) that she recently married Guy Maddin, the Canadian writer/director of expressionist neo-silents such as The Saddest Music In The World (2003), My Winnipeg (2007), Dracula:Pages from a Virgin's Diary (2002). If I were him, she's going in my movies!

---

We shall see.

Good movie blogs are very hard to find, I've found. Lots of them start up and disappear (like Arbogast on Film, with its great catchphrase "In which I must conduct an investigation of film history until it ends in my own death." ) Or Jim Emerson's Scanners (an Ebert protégé when Roger was alive.)

I like "Sergio Leone and the Infield Fly Rule," but THAT guy often goes weeks without posts. Same with Glenn Kenny and his blog "Some Came Running."

The Roger Ebert site is about the most active blog site right now. Lots of mini-blogs and articles; its the main home of Matt Zeiler Zotz or whatever his name is.

reply