MovieChat Forums > The Apartment (1960) Discussion > Referenced very sloppily in 'Mad Men'

Referenced very sloppily in 'Mad Men'


I don't know if there are any "Mad Men" fans here, but it really galled me when the character Joan made a reference to this film that showed that the writers had never seen it.

She said something to the effect that, "Did you see how they treated that girl? They passed her around that office like a. . . (something prized). . ."

Of course they didn't "pass her around" --- only Sheldrake nailed her.

What particularly galls me is that Matt Wiener, producer/writer for Mad Men is always being extolled as this "genius" for details and accuracy. In my mind a reference like this is disgraceful.

Woosh! Got that off my chest!

reply

I bet he never saw it. I missed that MM episode, and I'm glad you made your point.

reply

How do you know it wasn't the character Joan that made the mistake rather than the writer of Mad Men?

reply

Exactly. Joan projected herself into the movie and her own life. That was the whole point. You'll notice Roger also misinterpreted the movie because of his own world view. That's actually the point of a lot of Mad Men. Things are happening culturally that are jarring and people are so locked into their way of thinking that they don't "get" what is going on.

reply

Joan sees herself as being "passed around" to a certain extent, though on a certain level, she knows she's the one who is doing the passing. Fran tells Baxter about the boy she kissed in the graveyard and the guy she was with who was imprisoned for embezzlement. She moved to New York to get away but still makes bad decisions. Both are women who have options but don't seem to know it. Joan is smart and incredibly competent at what she does, but spends her free time having affairs with middle-aged men (Bert Cooper: "Don't waste your youth on age."). Fran is charming and has a perfectly nice man who is head over heels in love with her. Neither can see it

reply

Um. . . how do I know? I know, because that mistake is really egregious. It is not a easy one to make, not even close. She had to actually mistake what was going on in the office, that Fran was IN LOVE if Sheldrake; she had to not hear the line, "Lot's of guys have tried to approach her and, no dice!" Followed by, "Well, maybe she's just a nice, decent, girl."

How is all that possible?

Please don't insult me by saying Joan or Sterling were watching the film from their world view, or some ridiculous thing like that.

They screwed up.

reply

Um. . . how do I know? I know, because that mistake is really egregious. It is not a easy one to make, not even close. She had to actually mistake what was going on in the office, that Fran was IN LOVE if Sheldrake; she had to not hear the line, "Lot's of guys have tried to approach her and, no dice!" Followed by, "Well, maybe she's just a nice, decent, girl."

How is all that possible?

Please don't insult me by saying Joan or Sterling were watching the film from their world view, or some ridiculous thing like that.

They screwed up.

reply

She was projecting her own bitterness on the movie. All the writers and Hollywood/television people are old movie NUTS.ALL of them, you would not believe how much so. All you would have to say is "Shut up and deal" and they would know the reference was to this movie and everyone would be swapping stories about favorite scenes. When The Apartment came out, it was much discussed in just such a large company environment.

reply

Exactly. If Weiner and the other writers had never seen it, how the hell was Roger Sterling aware that all the elevator operators were white?

reply

But I found it funny that David White was in this movie, because i think his "Larry Tate" on "Bewitched" reminds me so of Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"

reply


in this film. Particularly Sheldrake's White Plains home was somewhat like Don Draper's home near Ossining.


The sun shone, having no alternative, on the nothing new. Samuel Beckett

reply

Yes, it annoyed me too. But only because Wilder was such a brilliant writer and Weiner purports to be. Actually there was all sorts of misdeeds in TA, but promiscuity wasn't one of them at least for what I remember.

Sympathy tends to evaporate with rampant misdeeds and Wilder was too clever for that.

reply

Interesting thread.

With less vehemance, I have to go with the OP that Weiner and Company were sloppy on this one --probably wanting to "make a point" and forcing The Apartment to take on a meaning(with re Fran) it didn't have -- nor did Joan.

Much later in the same episode, however, Joan does play "elevator operator" for Bert Cooper. Idea being that for all her airs, Joan is as powerless as Fran was with "the big guys."

---

I'm always more amused by Roger's response to Joan about recent summer 1960 movies. After she references The Apartment, Roger poo-poohs it as overdone and says:

Roger: I mean, have you seen that ridiculous "Psycho"? Movies today all have to be extreme.

Funny that a middle-aged ad exec would simply find "Psycho" ridiculous -- but certainly in character.

But wait, there's more:

John Slattery in real life is married to Talia Balsam, who, on "Mad Men" plays his once-wife, now-first-ex-wife Mona.

And Talia Balsam is the daughter of the late Oscar-winning(Supporting) actor Martin Balsam(he won for 1965's A Thousand Clowns), whose most famous movie was...Psycho(he's the detective stabbed on the stairs.)

So Roger was insulting his late father-in-law's most famous movie.

Oh, and before she was married to John Slattery, Talia was married to George Clooney, his only wife to date.

Not bad, eh?

reply

The OP has a point. It doesn't make me less of a Mad Men fan but I see what you mean.

Off topic but similar, I find it strange when Betty, early in the series is trying to discourage Sally from wanting to pursue horseback riding. She makes a comment about what happened to the little girl in Gone With the Wind.

Gone With the Wind was not a known film to Sally. Even if Betty had seen it, she would only have seen it many years earlier.

Unless things were much different in New York than in California, GWTW was never shown on television and, of course, there were no DVDS or VCRs.

I was born in 1949 and I never saw GWTW until after 1967. It was released theatrically around that time and I went to see it with my high school friends. It was a very big deal.

reply

Maybe she read the book. I read it in 1961 when I was 12. I'd guess it had probably recently been re-issued in paperback, because I bought most of my books then from the drugstore paperback rack.

reply

Matt Weiner is a genius and he most certainly watched the film.
It's indeed like some others already said, an interpretation from Joan's character. She reflected it on her own experiences and views.

reply