Hard to believe they are all gone
I saw this movie when it came out and it has always been a favorite. All the cast members are now passed on and it's strange how life comes and goes. Kind of sad.
shareI saw this movie when it came out and it has always been a favorite. All the cast members are now passed on and it's strange how life comes and goes. Kind of sad.
shareWhat makes it worse is the wonderful Dorothy McGuire wasn't even listed on the Academy Awards list of actors who had passed away.
sharethan mcguire not recognized....???? for god's sake. whatta story!!!!!!!!
shareDorothy McGuire wasn't even listed on the Academy Awards list of actors who had passed away.
I was just thinking the same thing. Funny, Constance Ford was nothing like that in real life. Dorothy certainly did get the short shrift. She was great in important films like Gentleman's Agreement, but to me, her greatest role was in A Tree Grows in Brooklyn. I'll never forget the scene where she is having her baby alone only with Francie to help her. Quality is often overlooked, it's a short coming in our culture.
shareI loved Dorothy McGuire in 'The Enchanted Cottage'. She is excellent.
As to Constance Ford, I was first introduced to her when I watched 'Another World' and I loved her character. Later on, I became a classic movie lover and had the chance to see her in various other very interesting role, including this one and her role as a nurse in 'The Caretakers'.
So sad we're losing (or have already lost) all these wonderful movie icons...
‘Six inches is perfectly adequate; more is vulgar!' (Prime of Miss Jean Brodie Re: An open window).
It is sad that they are all gone. Sadder still that Sandra and Troy died relatively young (in their early 60s) and that their careers never had the same momentum as before (I'm thinking of Sandra in particular). Richard Egan, Dorothy McGuire, Constance Ford and Arthur Kennedy were all underrated and underappreciated as actors (I would say the same for Sandra and Troy as well). It seems that the Hollywood of today has forgotten those who helped make the industry what it is and whose performances inspired actors and the public. So sad.
share
Enjoyed reading your comment...and I couldn't agree with you more. Hopefully, Sandra Dee enjoyed a few years of happiness with actor/singer Bobby Darin. (I was a senior in high school when this movie was released--and Sandra Dee was the talk of the nation!!) P.S. And Troy Donahue made a few good movies, too!!
FAS1
Long Live Bonnie Franklin (ODAAT). Still listed as one of the living by imdb.
Bit part, but definitely one of this crew.
Just noticed mother and son (Dorothy McGuire and Troy Donahue) died within 11 days of each other (Sept. 13th, 2001 and Sept. 2, 2001, respectively). There might have been a major event/disaster that happened right in between there, too...
"How do you feel?"
"Like the Kling-Klang King of the Rim-Ram Room!"
Troy and Dorothy's passing was lost amid the horror of 9/11.
http://theobamafile.com/index.htm
Yes, all those wonderful people gone. Sad.
WHAT THE MSM HIDES:
http://theobamafile.com/index.htm
When I watch old movies and TV shows I wonder who in the cast lived to see certain major events, especially 9/11. Troy didn't make it but Dorothy did, and so did Sandra FWIW. The rest were gone by then.
The past is a series of presents. The present is living history we are privileged to witness
When I watch old movies and TV shows I wonder who in the cast lived to see certain major events, especially 9/11.
And 1959 wasn't that long ago (only three years before I was born). Granted if the actors had healthier lifestyles (i.e. Sandra Dee) might still be alive.
share1959 was six years before I was born, and what makes the passage of time really hit home is that, among the lead actors (parents and the two kids), the oldest at the time was Arthur Kennedy, then 45. But the movie is now 53 years old (as of 2012), which means that more time has passed since it was filmed than the ages of any of the principal actors at the time of its production.
I didn't express that well, but you all get my point. I also agree that if Sandra and Troy had led healthier, less troubled lives, there's no reason either couldn't still be alive today (Sandra would be 70, Troy 76).
I was just thinking about those same sorts of time-passage puzzlers, hobnob. For example, I’m sure you recall the Jack Lemmon film “The Wackiest Ship in the Army,” in which there was a quip about Jack’s character, Lt. Rip Crandall, not getting his next promotion until about 1980. In the context of the film, which took place during World War Two (1943), that would have been 37 years in the future, which seemed like a LONG time into the future. But now, in 2012, the year 1980 is already 32 years behind us - which, for some of us, probably seems like a LONG time in the past (think Michael Douglas in "Wall Street" using a cell phone about the size of an accordion. And that was in 1987 for cryin' out loud). And the film itself, made in 1960, is already 52 years behind us. (I mention this because I remember reading your post on the "Battleground" board some time ago, in which you commented about the year "1974" being mentioned in that film. The mention of the year 1980 in TWSitA made me have the same thoughts. lol)
It's always surprising if not downright shocking to see how “young” some of our favorite stars were when they suddenly departed for that great motion picture studio in the sky. I just the other day was reminded that Judy Holliday died at only 43 years of age. Tyrone Power, only 44. Jeff Chandler, only 42. And so on… Even Peter Sellers, dead at 54. Not exactly a "young" age, but still, I'm sure he had at least a few more films left in him. Maybe even another Inspector Clouseau.
I'll quote Ferris Bueller here: Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
I urge EVERYONE quite strongly to read Robert Anton Wilson's books: COSMIC TRIGGER I, II, & III.
Time is speeding up and our days are not as long as they were 100 years ago.
I feel all this has something to do with the singularity, and apologize for going off topic a bit. However, read those books. Information is doubling on itself to the nth degree now.
Orwellian-Huxleyism is also in play: i.e. 'Big Brother is constantly watching as we are trivialized to death.' Orwellian-Huxleyism is a term I coined for one of my classical history survey classes last year. some of us university types know a lot about what is going on, but so many people think history is boring that they ignore us.
We are the gatekeepers - no one else can do that job for humanity but the historians.
I always find it interesting when I hear people say a specific date in a film now many decades old.
For instance, in the original Cape Fear (1962), Gregory Peck's daughter asks him when they'll be able to afford a big cabin cruiser such as the one she sees on the river, and he replies, "It's on our fiscal program for the year 1980."
In the Powell/Pressburger film The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (1943), a bunch of young soldiers in a war game in England decide to start the "war" early and capture the elderly commanding officers of the Home Guard -- as a lesson against thinking about this war as some chivalrous affair of honor and rules. When they capture the men, the film's elderly general sputters that he's spent 40 years in the Army, and that the young officer who's captured them is an upstart. The younger man replies insultingly, and after repeating the general's line about all he's done in 40 years, says, "But in 1983, I'll be able to look back and say, 'I was a fellow of enterprise.'"
Even in the 1955 sci-fi flick Tarantula, scientist Leo G. Carroll, in explaining the food shortages expected as the world's population grows, tells John Agar that there are 2 billion people in the world today, then proceeds to give (very inaccurate, low-ball estimates) of the world's anticipated population, first in 1975, then in "the year 2000". "Not many of us look that far ahead, professor," says Agar. It's cool, today.
What's the old song? "Where Did the Twentieth Century Go?"
The 1941 film has hero whow as fated to die on a certain day in 1991 but by mistake dies to early and is given the life of another to compensate for it. AMC or TCM broadcast the film on that day in 1991 and I watched it then without realizing why it was being shown then. It gave me a start when Robert Montomgery, (who missed living that long by a decade), is told that was when he was supposed to die and I realized it was today's date!
The past is a series of presents. The present is living history we are privileged to witness
He was meant to die on the morning of May 11, 1991 -- a Saturday. I noted it at the time, too, and even mentioned it to a couple of people that morning! But if I recall -- and I have no idea why I remember this -- the film was shown a few days earlier, not on the day itself. I remember because I thought they had made a huge mistake in not running it on the exact date.
I think it was run on AMC, but it couldn't have been TCM, which didn't go on the air until 1995.
Did TCM really not come on the air until 1995? I thought it was much older than that.
Anyway, I think about these things having to do with the passage of time a lot too. I always thought it was just me; good to know I'm not alone.
I wonder if film has a way of making you think about time. For me, it might be that many, if not most, of the color movies don't seem that long ago. You go along watching as if it was a few years ago at most. Then you are jolted into the realization of just how much time has gone by and how old the actors are by now.
Black and white films "feel" old and I don't think the same time head warp happens, at least for me.
Also, pre-tech age, the phones and gadgets didn't look that different from what we were using. Up until computers and cell phones. As mentioned above, the cell phone in "Wall Street" is an accordion and dates the film.
I love how great homes used in film are quite timeless. The ones that come to mind are the farm house in Christmas in Connecticut, Bing's home in Holiday Inn, the ranch hacienda in the 1961 Parent Trap, and the Frank Lloyd Wright in A Summer Place. I'd feel like I died and went to heaven in any one of those great homes.
So here's the time warp I remember from a movie. In "Send Me No Flowers", Rock is buying cemetery plots and Paul Lynde tells him there are plans for a state highway to go right through "Green Hills". But he says it isn't definite and not until 1980. Then they discuss whether Rock would want to be moved or buried deeper under the freeway. Rock says "whatever the others do, I'll go along with them." A perfect line actually for the conformity of the times.
I understand where you're coming from.
I'm a big fan of black & white, and hate things like colorization, but I agree, most color films "seem" newer -- just because they're in color, like everything these days.
Gadgets seems more dated to me if they're immediate ancestors of things we're using today than if they're items long out of date. Your example of the Wall Street cell phone is a perfect one. On the other hand, if I see a movie from the 30s and they're using the old "candlestick" phone, that doesn't seem dated to me at all because it's what you'd expect to see for the period.
But great houses seldom go out of true style. The house in A Summer Place looks as timelessly lovely now as it did in 1959 (though perhaps not quite so unique). Same with the Frank Lloyd Wright house shown that same year in North by Northwest.
I remember that "1980" line about the cemetary in Send Me No Flowers. Like the mention of 1980 in the original Cape Fear, which I noted above, it sounded farther into the future than it really was -- just 16 years.
What strikes me about TCM isn't that it's only been on 18 years -- it's that it's already been on 18 years. 1995 doesn't seem that long ago! (And, per this movie, back then Dorothy McGuire, Sandra Dee and Troy Donahue were all still alive, if not altogether well.)
I was observing the same thing jmars35264 and this is one of the reasons I am so opposed to remakes.
These people are all gone now, yet this ground-breaking production they devoted part of their careers to creating lives on. This is their creation, they have left their mark and credit should belong to them alone.
Do dancers have a longer life than non-dancers? I.E., in "Seven Brides for Seven Brothers," four of the five dancers are still living. The ages are 100, 94, 79, and 79. The brother who is not alive died at the age of 91 in 2013.
Ironically, SBFSB was made five years earlier than "A Summer Place."
I don't know about dancers, but women in classic horror pictures do last a very long time. Carla Laemmle the woman reading aloud, inside the coach, in Dracula (1931) was born in 1909 and is still alive. Similarly, the actress Lupita Tovar who played Eva Seward in the Spanish version of Dracula (1931) was born in 1910 and she is also still alive.
I find it fascinating. I wonder if they did/do anything special to still be alive at 104+. True, being alive is not necessarily living. Hopefully, they are still vital and are able to engage in their surroundings.