Aurora is just the best.


She's actually feminine and not a "Strong Independent Womyn" like every female character nowadays.

She's also possibly the most beautiful animated character ever.

reply

[deleted]

I don't understand why females have to be like Mulan or Merida in order to be considered a good character.


Because those characters are politically correct.

reply

[deleted]

Yeah, I've seen The Hunger Games. It's yet another example of political correctness. Katniss is the typical feminist character that's in all the movies these days.

reply

[deleted]

I did when I was younger. Why do you ask?

reply

[deleted]

Well I definitely like Sleeping Beauty more than Harry Potter.

reply

[deleted]

I'm not sure. I just lost interest in it, I guess.

reply

[deleted]

Nah. I'm not a very religious person.

reply

[deleted]

I don't understand why either.

reply

I don't understand why certain Christians who don't allow Harry Potter are okay with Disney movies.


Yeah, my mom is actually that way (and she's not even strongly Christian at all), so of course I asked her why, and she couldn't really explain it clearly herself. Show her a Disney movie with magic in it or The Wizard of Oz with the wicked witches, and she won't raise an eyebrow--heck, she has even commented on how cool some of the characters' powers are, like with Rapunzel and Elsa--but show her or even just mention anything involving Harry Potter, and she'd practically recoil from it, putting it down as something profane or sacrilegious. That's purely her natural reaction, as I'm pretty sure that she hasn't discussed this with anyone else (doesn't talk about movies or books often, especially ones she has no interest in, of course).

From what I've been able to glean/parse from her, it seems to have something to do with a perception that the world of Harry Potter effectively serves as a kind of religion/cult in itself that some people--specifically children--get way too carried away with, and it's kind of superimposed as an alternative way of viewing the world (and one that she personally doesn't like or approve of, obviously). Every other example is more like a self-contained one-off, which she views as harmless fantasy that she often can enjoy herself (she has absolutely nothing against Disney characters who wield magic--in fact, they're among her favorites). That's what I think, anyway, as she couldn't fully explain how she felt and why, even though her negative reaction seems quite strong.

Perhaps others have their own reasons, although the common thread appears to be that Harry Potter is perceived as kind of a threat, at least when children are involved, while Disney and others are not. And remember, like I said, my mom is not even that religious at all (raised Christian, but is a bit agnostic these days like many--she is in no way a "God person" who thinks or talks about God/religion every day).

reply

You're confusing magic with witchcraft. Disney rarely if ever promotes that but it goes without hand that HP does, on top of some poor role models in the lead "heroes" but that one's less discussed than the sorcery.

I drink coffee FOR BREAKFAST.

reply

The only time she looks beautiful is when she is asleep in the castle. Why wasn't she animated that way for the rest of the film ?

"I say,open this door at once! We're British !"

reply

While I will always agree how insane modern day feminists are and how annoyingly PC things can be these days, I in no way believe it has affected the quality of Disney movies in any negative way. Disney has managed to avoid such nonsense, at least in their animated films.

Don't make me take off my shoe!

reply

True OP

RIP
Jeff Hanneman
1964-2013

reply

Princess Aurora rules.

reply

She's actually feminine and not a "Strong Independent Womyn" like every female character nowadays.


To me Aurora actually seems like the same kind of character as the modern Disney princesses (in addition to Snow White and Cinderella). We didn't get to know her quite as well as the others, but at least we're shown that she thinks for herself and knows what she wants, and there is nothing inherently masculine or feminine about this. And as I'm fond of pointing out, she also has a bit of "spunk," clearly knowing more than she let on about what the fairies are up to, as well as hooking up with a guy on her own.

Although all of these princess characters have unique personalities, in these basic ways Aurora is pretty similar to recent examples such as Rapunzel and Anna, as well as virtually all of the rest, for that matter. You might have exceptions like Merida in mind, but she's from a different studio (Pixar) anyway, and of course there are many live-action examples that are often even worse in the way I think you mean.

Disney Animation, though, are generally very good with their heroines and princesses, in my opinion--they (including Aurora) have independence and strength, but not in an overtly masculine, clunky, obviously forced, overcompensating way that some others use to make some kind of point. They just seem like real, relatable girls or young women who, though not perfect (like the rest of us), have admirable qualities (and let's not deny it, they are adorable ). One obvious exception in some people's minds might be Mulan, but even that seems to be a lot more a matter of circumstance than the character herself.

reply

[deleted]

She lived in an isolated hut with three inept old dears, she could probably out survive a troop of boy scouts and their leader. She most likely chopped wood, hunted, foraged in harsh winters, defended herself against large wild animals. I would say in reality Aurora was most likely one of the toughest of all princesses. Heck even Merida had a big tough daddy to teach her about hunting and things, all Aurora got was the moronic fairy's.

Why do people so frequently get told to read the book on a movie database?

reply