I suppose the verbosity -- but let us say "emphasis on dialog" --
may come from its origins as a stage play. In terms of the camera
work, we often find the lens staring at Marlon, and clearly we're
supposed to think Marlon is hot stuff, but if you don't happen to
think he's hot stuff, then that strategy fails, because he is not
emoting or doing anything else very interesting. I am kind of
surprised that Williams worked on the movie script: it seems to
have flashes of his style but they are intermittent. At several
points the dialog and action ring false, as if some important
transition had been chopped out. Bad editing, maybe?
I kept having the feeling that many of the people working in or
on this movie were saying to themselves, "Oh, this is a Daring
Important Arty Movie, not just trash for the masses." I got a
whiff of so-1950s self-importance and preciosity. But maybe
that's just me. It's certainly not something I've encountered
elsewhere in Williams's work, or that of most of the players.
I am kind of surprised the ending caught danser1 by surprise.
The movie is squarely in the Lonesome Hot Stranger genre and
the major outlines that are going to be followed are plain from
the beginning. The plan is:
1. LHS comes to town and swaggers around.
2. A certain woman (or women) get excited
although they Ought Not because of their
social position (rich, married, etc.)
3. Something bad happens to the hero and he
a. gets killed
b. disappears
c. is unaccountably domesticated
(all more or less equivalent)
Cf. Long Hot Summer, Picnic, etc. etc. etc.
The extra in this movie is that there are
_two_ women, one of whom is Bad. I don't know
of many LHS movies with that extra flavor. I
suppose it is extra testimony to Marlon's
hotness. The effort to promote Marlon's hotness
seems way over the top, incidentally; it's almost
Gay softcore. But I think that goes along with
the aforesaid self-importance and may even
contain an element of conscious humor.
reply
share