MovieChat Forums > Anatomy of a Murder (1959) Discussion > why is it in black and white

why is it in black and white


i mean i know its 59 but still he made i think 6 movies before that...that were in color

reply

I didn't miss anything in this film colour could have mended.


--
I never make mistakes. Once I thought I did, but I was wrong.

reply

What's wrong with black and white? It worked for me.

"You can't HANDLE the truth!" Jack Nicholson, "A Few Good Men."

reply

Like others mentioned, it was still a common stylistic choice back then. I've noticed that plenty of films with unreliable narrators were in black and white.
I guess it had something to do with the underlying themes of this and most courtroom dramas. Lack of clarity, deceit, death or violence, etc.

reply

I liked it in the black and white. Visually I respond more to shapes than colors, so I've always preferred black and white films. You get so much more sense of drama with those shadows.

http://thinkingoutloud-descartes.blogspot.com/

reply

Hey folks,

The vast majority of B/W films were not filmed that way for art sake. They were filmed in B/W because of cost. Color film was far more costly. Initially, color film was used strictly for high budget films such as "Gone With the Wind" and similar films. As the cost of color film became more competitive with B/W film, more films were made in color, but when a film company was making a "standard" film and wanting to maximize profits, they still went with B/W film. As the price of using color film continued to drop, most films were made in color, and it finally became a very "artsy" choice to film in B/W. When films like "The Last Picture Show," "Schlindler's List," were made, it was well publicized that they were being filmed in B/W for the sake of art. I suspect that some of the B/W "art" choices were more secretly about cost rather than art.

To suggest that a particular film simply had to be filmed in B/W or color is a very subjective statement. I doubt if many folks would want to watch "Gone With the Wind" in B/W if they had a choice. However, if it had been filmed in B/W, I also suspect there would be many folks who would call it a crime if someone wanted to show it in color. I think this would also be true of "The Wizard of Oz," yet I am certain most folks would be happy to see the film in B/W if it had never been done in color.

"It's A Wonderful Life" was filmed in B/W, and I enjoyed it in B/W for many, many years. Then I bought a colorized version of the film, and I found out I still liked the film in color. The story was not any different in color, but for me the colorized version added a new dimension to the picture that I enjoyed.

When "Anatomy of A Murder" first came out in 1959, I liked the film very much. It had a bunch of actors I liked very much, and it was a good story. Despite the talk about the film being shot in B/W because Preminger chose art for the courtroom film, the fact is this was not exactly a high budget film at the time. While the actors are favorites of mine, the only one with a high dollar salary at the time was James Stewart, and I would bet his salary was not that big. Even George C. Scott worked for small bucks back then. It was all shot in Michigan with minimal location costs. This simply was not a big budget film, and I suspect the use of B/W film instead of color had a whole lot more to do with maximizing profits rather than any consideration of art.

Best wishes,
Dave Wile


reply

"the use of B/W film instead of color had a whole lot more to do with maximizing profits rather than any consideration of art."

Then thank God for low budgets; black-and-white is perfect for this movie.

reply

The vast majority of B/W films were not filmed that way for art sake. They were filmed in B/W because of cost. Color film was far more costly.


B&W is a different medium that has technical advantages aside from cost and aesthetics. B&W film is sharper and has higher resolution than colour negatives.
Not to mention the huge dynamic range.

Initially, color film was used strictly for high budget films such as "Gone With the Wind" and similar films.


GWTW is a three strip Technicolor film. It was shot on three strips on black and white film through colour filters. I'm quite sure that the only real colour film at the time was Kodachrome which was a positive film and not much interest to Hollywood though popular with home movie makers. First feature films shot on colour negative were made in Germany during WWII.

Then I bought a colorized version of the film, and I found out I still liked the film in color.


"Colorized" is not in colour, what you see is nothing to do with what the camera saw and what was captured on the film. It's just someones fantasy applied to someone elses work. Frank Capra faught hard to stop this defacement of his work but lost.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

I saw the B&W option as being a throwback to Noir...

-- you've got the Femme Fatale with ulterior motives in Lee Remick
-- Jimmy Stewart as the 'detective' out to clear his (Clients) Name
-- Victim who might have deserved it/won't be missed

'the case' could have worked just as easily with PI Chandler Hammett having an old army buddy show up on his doorstep; and he investigates to get the facts before the Cops arrest his buddy... change Dancer's prosecutor to 'Officer Ahole' the cop hates PIs and wants to arrest him, and the Judge to a Lead Detective and the 'facts' of the case would have flowed much the same

-- then again I might have noir on the brain, recently seeing 'This Gun for Hire', Glass Key, and Double Indemnity' in the last Month or so and watching Big Sleep and Maltese Falcon on a semi annul basis

reply